The COVID-19 vaccines fast-tracked are not conventional vaccines. The FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization was a crime—according to their own data, comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. Emergency authorization of these gene therapies labeled vaccines as long as there was no other effective treatment for COVID-19. There was, but they demonized and covered up the 95-99% cure rates of Hydroxichloroquine or Ivermectine combined with zinc. But a cure is the opposite of what the cabal wants. Their design is aimed at manipulating your very biology, and therefore have the potential to alter the biology of the entire human race. The science behind conventional vaccines is to train your body to recognize and respond to the proteins of a particular virus by injecting a small amount of the actual viral protein into your body, thereby triggering an immune response and the development of antibodies. It destroys the T-cells and immune system.
In a video by an Idaho pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole who examines cells from hospitals to determine if they are cancerous or not, says, “I’m seeing a 20 fold increase in endometrial cancers. The vaccines are dropping the T-cell (CD4 and 8 cells) immune cells.” Starting at minute 11 he talks about why cancer rates are rising, with the vaccine depressing T cell response. He is also seeing more shingles, more deadly Melanoma cancers, and all other kinds of rashes that T-cells normally suppress. He is eloquent and fact-based in his analysis, so it’s worth watching the entire 30 min video.
After telling Americans that vaccines offer better protection than natural infection, a study out of Israel, described by Bloomberg as “the largest real-world analysis comparing natural immunity – gained from an earlier infection – to the protection provided by one of the most potent vaccines currently in use,” proves the opposite is true: natural infection offers a much better shield against the delta variant (13X) than vaccines.
Created by DARPA
Prior to the worldwide lockdowns in 2020, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were surreptitiously working on a new mRNA vaccine platform using a new biotech company called Moderna. Their strategic planning began in 2013, when DARPA funds were used by Moderna to invent methods for inducing a short-lived immune response through administration of mRNA vaccines.
The inventor of the mRNA platform, Dr. Robert Malone, reveals that “Moderna was essentially founded by DARPA.” Millions of dollars in DARPA grants built the vaccine program, through patents handed down to Moderna. However, Moderna refuses to disclose these DARPA awards in the patent applications that they filed for the new vaccine technology. DARPA is behind the mRNA spike protein experiment, with help from the NIH.
As this secretive DARPA project comes to light, it becomes apparent that nefarious forces within the US government were planning to unleash this technology for years prior to a “public health emergency.” To achieve compliance, they only needed to exploit human psychology, suspend the rule of law, and threaten people’s livelihoods to coerce the population to enter into this experiment and alter the natural physiology of their cells and biological functions. A director at the NIH, Dr. Anthony Fauci, made sure of that when he called for a nationwide lock down in March of 2020. Carrying out the plan, Fauci is now calling for mandatory injections of this genocidal operating software.
Watchdog group, Knowledge Ecology International, points out that Moderna received $20 million in DARPA grants several years before the “worldwide pandemic.” The group asserts that these funds “likely” led to the development of this new vaccine technology. This longstanding operation includes 26 patents assigned to “Moderna” or “ModernaTx” as well as 154 patent applications. A closer look at these patents shows that Moderna took part in DARPA’s Autonomous Diagnostics to Enable Prevention and Therapeutics (ADEPT) program. This funding paved the way for Moderna to develop mRNA vaccine programs for Chikungunya and Zika viruses, and other upcoming respiratory pathogens. DARPA would later, in October 2020, award Moderna with a $56 Million contract.
In response to the inquiry, DARPA says it is “actively researching agency awards to Moderna to identify which patents and pending patents, if any at all, may be associated with DARPA support.” Instead of undergoing an independent audit of their planned mRNA spike protein operation, DARPA is allowed to investigate its own financial trail, which assuredly leads to secretive mRNA experiments being conducted by their operatives at Moderna.
Regardless of the greater conspiracy to experiment on human populations, it is Moderna’s legal obligation to disclose U.S. federal government support in patent applications under the Bayh-Dole Act and regulations issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. DARPA plainly admits they are the brainchild behind this global experiment, declaring on their website: “The first coronavirus vaccine to start human testing is from DARPA investment in the Moderna company.” Even though the mRNA inventions were conceived over the past eight years, Moderna fails to disclose that DARPA was behind the projects all along and denied that federal funds were involved.
Up until 2016, geneticist Daniel Wattendorf was the program manager at DARPA, where he initiated and lead programs that deploy diagnostics, gene transfer drugs, engineered red blood cells and RNA vaccines. He was behind the ADEPT program in 2012, and he advanced the mRNA research through Pfizer and Moderna in 2013. After leading these mRNA vaccines programs, he took a job as the director of Innovate Technology Solutions at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, where he is tasked with creating diagnostic tests and biotechnology platforms for “global health solutions.”
Bill Gates is the primary funder of the MHRA, the UK’s Medicine Regulator, and a primary funder of mRNA vaccine producer Moderna in which they have an agreement that obligates Moderna to grant Bill Gates a non-exclusive license to their Covid-19 vaccine.
When the Pentagon funds and deploys an experiment onto the entire population, it’s no wonder the US is forced to accept an indefinite public health emergency across every community simultaneously. The US continues to suffer under medical martial law, suspended civil liberties, and the continual threat of totalitarian force, even against the bodies of healthcare workers and the individual members of the military themselves. Perhaps to avoid the massive pushback, big pharma has endeavored on a more clandestine plan: scientists are working on a way to make your leafy green salad a new cutting-edge COVID vaccine delivery system.
Global experiment turns people’s bodies into operating systems, controlled by mRNA vaccine updates. The theory behind these inoculations is that when you inject the mRNA into your cells, it will stimulate your cells to manufacture their own viral protein. The mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is the first of its kind. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed before. And, to add insult to injury, they’re forgoing all animal safety testing.
In an exclusive interview with The New American magazine’s Senior Editor Alex Newman, world-renown German-Thai-American microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi warns that the COVID hysteria is based on lies and that the COVID “vaccines” are set to cause a global catastrophe and a decimation of the human population. Did you know that a confidentiality agreement shows potential coronavirus vaccine candidates were transferred from Moderna to the University of North Carolina and signed by Ralph Baric, PhD and 2 others in 2019, nineteen days prior to the official emergence of Covid-19 pandemic? How did they know a pandemic was coming unless it was engineered?
What’s in the ‘Vaccine‘?
The Connecticut Department of Public Health has published the Ingredients list for the Moderna COVID “Vaccine” and that data sheet confirms it contains a chemical “SM-102.” In that same OSHA filing, the manufacturer declares SM-102 “Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure.” The SM-102 Material Safety Data Sheet describes this chemical as “NOT FOR HUMAN OR VETERINARY USE”1
Graphene oxide nanoparticles are in the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines. Moderna has a patent (US Patent# 10703789, July 2020) describing it as a main ingredient in their AI gel-forming hydrogel for mRNA vaccines. Graphene Oxide is a great conductor of electromagnetic fields. These nanoparticles can be used to exchange data in the vaccinated person via WiFi. Former Pfizer employee and certified medical investigator Karen Kingston describes it very well in THIS video. More here…
Antidote to the Graphene Oxide/hydrogel in Vaccines: According to the same Spanish research site La Quinta Columna (5th Column) that alerted the world to the presence of graphene oxide in the vaccines, they say that N-acetyl cystein (NAC), and Zinc will break it down and remove it. N-acetyl cystein, or NAC, is the supplement form of the amino acid cysteine, which converts to glutathione, a powerful antioxidant. Dose: They say, one 600MG capsule of each in the morning, empty stomach. Also See more on nanotechnology below…
mRNA Gene Therapy
The SEC filing13 for BioNTech (BioNTech’s mRNA technology is used in the Pfizer vaccine) is equally clear, stating on page 21: “Although we expect to submit BLAs for our mRNA-based product candidates in the United States, and in the European Union, mRNA therapies have been classified as gene therapy medicinal products, other jurisdictions may consider our mRNA-based product candidates to be new drugs, not biologics or gene therapy medicinal products, and require different marketing applications.”
So, in the U.S. and Europe, mRNA therapies, as a group, are classified as “gene therapy medicinal products.” The crux here, again, appears to be the idea that mRNA therapy does not cause permanent DNA alterations. On page 35 of the BioNTech SEC filing, they further clarify the alleged difference between other, irreversible, gene therapies and mRNA gene therapy:
“There have been few approvals of gene therapy products in the United States and other jurisdictions, and there have been well-reported significant adverse events associated with their testing and use.
Gene therapy products have the effect of introducing new DNA and potentially irreversibly changing the DNA in a cell. In contrast, mRNA is highly unlikely to localize to the nucleus, integrate into cell DNA, or otherwise make any permanent changes to cell DNA.
Consequently, we expect that our product candidates will have a different potential side effect profile from gene therapies because they lack risks associated with altering cell DNA irreversibly.”
Despite being a recognized form of gene therapy since its inception, vaccine makers are now frantically trying to deny that this mRNA technology is gene therapy. One reason for this, suggested by David Martin, Ph.D., might be because as long as they’re considered “vaccines,” they will be shielded from liability.
Experimental gene therapies do not have financial liability shielding from the government, but pandemic vaccines do, even in the experimental stage, as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect. Another reason might be because they fear people won’t line up for experimental gene therapy. It has a very different connotation in people’s minds (as it should).
A third possibility is that they know full well that you cannot, ethically, mandate gene therapy in the way you can mandate vaccines (see Jacobson v. Massachusetts). Mandatory public health measure directives are typically based on the idea that it’s acceptable for some individuals to be harmed as long as the measure benefits the collective.
Well, the COVID-19 “vaccines” are only designed to lessen symptoms of COVID-19. They do not prevent infection or spread, and since the vaccinated individual is the only one receiving a potential benefit, “the greater good” argument falls apart.
The pandemic allowed them to sneak mRNA gene therapy under the proverbial radar so that they don’t have to conduct more stringent gene therapy safety testing. Instead, they were handed the global population for the largest testing imaginable, and all without liability when something goes wrong — provided it’s viewed as a “vaccine,” that is.
Dr. Carrie Madej reviews some of the background of certain individuals participating in the race for a COVID-19 vaccine, which include Moderna co-founder Derrick Rossi, a Harvard researcher who successfully reprogrammed stem cells using modified RNA, thus changing the function of the stem cells. Moderna was founded on this concept of being able to modify human biological function through genetic engineering, Madej says.
COVID-19 Vaccines Likened to ‘Software Updates’ for Your Body
The mRNA vaccine platform is described by Moderna as an “operating system” being installed in your body, upon which “software” in the form of mRNA is deployed and updated to produce “applications” which are proteins. This is all described on Moderna’s own web site.
The goal of installing this operating system in your body, of course, is so that globalist-linked corporations can exercise remote control over your physiology while claiming intellectual property ownership over your body’s cells. In essence, all who take the mRNA vaccine are being branded like cattle and coerced into replicating patented mRNA strands at the cellular level, thus engaging in intellectual property theft, allowing vaccine corporations to claim ownership of your entire body.1
Try as they might, though, they cannot get rid of mRNA’s gene therapy label. For starters, Moderna describes its product as “gene therapy technology” in its SEC filings. On page 70, they also provide the following specifics:2
“Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. Unlike certain gene therapies that irreversibly alter cell DNA and could act as a source of side effects, mRNA-based medicines are designed to not irreversibly change cell DNA; however, side effects observed in gene therapy could negatively impact the perception of mRNA medicines despite the differences in mechanism.”
In other words, it’s a form of gene therapy, but one that doesn’t enter and permanently alter your actual DNA. Instead, the mRNA stays in the cellular fluid where ribosomes read the code and create the protein per the mRNA’s coding.
Company executives and scientists familiar with mRNA technology have, for years, been referring to this new technology as gene therapy. The video above features a TED Talk by Dr. Tal Zaks, chief medical officer of Moderna, given in 2017, more than two full years before COVID-19.
In it, he points out that they were, at that time, already working on a variety of vaccines, including an mRNA vaccine for influenza and individualized cancer vaccines based on the genetic sequence of the patient’s tumor, stressing that this vaccine would not act like any previous vaccine ever created.
“We’ve been living this phenomenal digital scientific revolution, and I’m here today to tell you that we are actually hacking the software of life, and that it’s changing the way we think about prevention and treatment of disease,” Zaks said.
“In every cell there’s this thing called messenger RNA or mRNA for short, that transmits the critical information from the DNA in our genes to the protein, which is really the stuff we’re all made out of. This is the critical information that determines what the cell will actually do. So, we think of it as an operating system …
So, if you could change that … if you could introduce a line of code, or change a line of code, it turns out that has profound implications for everything, from the flu to cancer …
Imagine if instead of giving [the patient] the protein of a virus, we gave them the instructions on how to make the protein, how the body can make its own vaccine,” he said.
The difference between vaccine mRNA and your natural mRNA is that your natural mRNA resides in the nucleus of the cell where your cellular DNA resides — it can be likened to a reverse photocopy of your DNA — and exits the nucleus when a protein needs to be made. (For clarification, code in your natural mRNA matches your DNA, whereas vaccine mRNA has no equivalence inside your genome since it’s coming from the outside. Vaccine mRNA still carries “genetic code,” though, just not anything found in your body before.)
The mRNA vaccines are designed to instruct your cells to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the glycoprotein that attaches to the ACE2 receptor of the cell. This is the first stage of the two-stage process viruses use to gain entry into cells. Research obtained by a group of scientists shows the COVID vaccine spike protein can travel from the injection site and accumulate in organs and tissues including the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, adrenal glands and in “quite high concentrations” in the ovaries. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist and associate professor at University of Guelph Ontario who was awarded a $230,000 grant by the Canadian government to study Covid vaccine development said,
“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now. We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.” (Emphasis added)
Once in circulation, the spike protein can attach to specific ACE2 receptors that are on blood platelets and the cells that line blood vessels, Bridle said. “When that happens it can do one of two things. It can either cause platelets to clump, and that can lead to clotting — that’s exactly why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. It can also lead to bleeding,” he added.
The idea is that by creating the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, your immune system will mount a response to it and begin producing antibodies to the virus. However, as reported by The Vaccine Reaction, researchers have pointed out potential weaknesses:
According to researchers at University of Pennsylvania and Duke University, mRNA vaccines have potential safety issues, including local and systemic inflammation and stimulation of auto-reactive antibodies and autoimmunity, as well as development of edema (swelling) and blood clots.
In an interview with Dr. Seneff and Dr. Mikovits, they both stressed to interviewer Dr. Mercola that the key danger — both in COVID-19 and with the vaccines — is the spike protein itself. However, while the spike protein found in the virus is bad, the spike protein your body produces in response to the vaccine is far worse. Why?
Because the synthetic mRNA in the vaccine has been programmed to instruct your cells to produce an unnatural, genetically engineered spike protein. Specific alterations make it far more toxic than that found on the virus itself. Mikovits goes so far as to call the spike protein a bioweapon, as it is a disease-causing agent that demolishes innate immunity and exhausts your natural killer (NK) cells’ ability to determine which cells are infected and which aren’t.
In short, when you get the COVID-19 vaccine, you are being injected with an agent that instructs your body to produce the bioweapon in its own cells. This is about as diabolical as it gets.
In her paper, “Worse Than The Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh, Seneff explains why the unnatural spike protein is so problematic.
In summary, normally, the spike protein on a virus will collapse on itself and fall into the cell once it attaches to the ACE2 receptor. The vaccine-induced spike protein does not do this. Instead it stays open and remains attached to the ACE2 receptor, thereby disabling it and causing a host of problems that lead to heart, lung and immune impairment.
What’s more, because the RNA code has been enriched with extra guanines (Gs) and cytosines (Cs), and configured as if it’s a human messenger RNA molecule ready to make protein by adding a polyA tail, the spike protein’s RNA sequence in the vaccine looks as if it is part bacteria, part human and part viral at the same time.
There’s also evidence suggesting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein may be a prion, which is yet another piece of really bad news, particularly as it pertains to vaccine-induced spike protein. Prions are membrane proteins and when they misfold, they form crystals in the cytoplasm resulting in prion disease.
Since the mRNA in the vaccines has been modified to spew out very high amounts of spike protein (far greater than that of the actual virus), the risk of excessive buildup in the cytoplasm is high. And, since the spike protein doesn’t enter into the membrane of the cell, there’s a high risk that it can become problematic if indeed it works like a prion.
Remember, the research cited by Bridle at the beginning of this article found the spike protein accumulates in the spleen, among other places. Parkinson’s disease is a prion disease that has been traced back to prions originating in the spleen, that then travel up to the brain via the vagus nerve. In the same way, it’s quite possible COVID-19 vaccines may promote Parkinson’s and other human prion diseases such as Alzheimer’s.
Systemic inflammation, auto-reactive antibodies and autoimmune problems are not insignificant concerns. In fact, these are in large part why previous attempts to create a coronavirus vaccine have ALL failed.
Over the past 20 years, coronavirus vaccine research has been plagued by one consistent adverse outcome in particular, namely paradoxical immune enhancement. This is caused by the fact that coronaviruses produce two different types of antibodies—neutralizing antibodies5 that fight the infection, and binding antibodies6 (also known as nonneutralizing antibodies) that cannot prevent viral infection.
Incapable of preventing viral infection, binding antibodies can instead trigger paradoxical immune enhancement. What that means is that it looks good until you get the disease, and then it makes the disease far worse than it would have been otherwise. As detailed in my interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in one coronavirus vaccine trial using ferrets, all the vaccinated animals died when exposed to the actual virus.
According to Madej, animal studies have also found the type of mRNA technology introduced with this vaccine can increase the risk of cancer and mutagenesis (gene mutations).
Scientists have found the synthetic spike proteins in COVID vaccines are more dangerous than in naturally-occurring SARS-COV-2 infections to susceptible persons because:
- COVID-19 victims die from cytokine storms when the body’s immune system attacks the body’s organs. Vaccines can cause antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), a quicker cytokine storm, i.e., more severe illness, when a vaccinated person is next exposed to a wild virus. Prior attempts to develop coronavirus vaccines killed test animals or made them severely ill when subsequently encountering the wild virus. ADE occurs more in elderly or high-risk persons, in persons who had previous influenza vaccines or previously recovered from a SARS-COV-2 infection. Informed consent requires disclosing ADE risk;
- mRNA and the vector COVID vaccines are “leaky ” i.e., do not stop infection or transmission. In a Geert Bossche warned of deaths from mass corona vaccinations (Epoch Times March 2021) because leaky vaccines cause immune escape — the mutation and spread of more infectious viral variants. In May, world-reknowned Nobel laureate virologist Luc Montagnier warned COVID vaccination is creating new variants. Vaccinated persons become spreaders of more infectious mutations of SARS-COV-2. The more people vaccinated, the higher the risk of evolving strains. There is evidence of vaccinated spreaders and an increase in serious COVID cases among the young, e.g. in Israel. “Break-through” cases are occurring in fully vaccinated people worldwide. E.g., Florida;
- The lipid nano-particles (LNP)s cause human cells to manufacture synthetic spike proteins throughout the body that are more pathogentic than the original SARS-COV-2 spike protein, quickly spreading in greater numbers inside the body than a natural infection; causing, often, a large bump in excess mortality concomidant with vaccination rollouts. The spike protein may invade brain tissue, infecting neurons and causing neurotropism. The S1 sub-unit of the spike protein enters the parenchymal tissue of the brain in murine models. The brain’s endothelial cells attempt to hide the spike protein in the brain capillary glycocalyx, which can lead to degradation of the glycocalyx, dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and cerebral edema. (citation);
- The polyethylene glycol, PEG, encasing the lipid nano-particles in the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, causes severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis in some persons;
- Risks of blood coagulation and clotting (thrombosis) or Covid vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, or VITT is caused by synthetic spike proteins growing in the lungs, heart, ovaries, brain, liver, kidneys, bone marrow, testes, and other organs disabling the body’s ACE-2 receptors… The spike proteins bind to endothelial cells lining blood vessels. … causing platelets to clot in a majority of vaccine recipients… and may cause bleeding disorders …and heart problems. … and … cause neurological damage and clots in the brain. (citation). Doctors have reported seeing rapid development of advanced cancers occurring post-Covid vaccination in liver, lungs, and bones.
- The Covid mRNA and DNA vaccines do not provide mucosal immunity that would prevent infection and spread of COVID disease. (see Mucosal Immunity in COVID-19: A Neglected but Critical Aspect of SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Michael W. Russell, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States, Zina Moldoveanu, Pearay L. Ogra, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States and Jiri Mestecky, Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States 30 November 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.611337 ) The mucosal immune system is the largest component of the human immune system, … providing protection at the main sites of infectious threat: the mucosael barriers. As SARS-CoV-2 initially infects the upper respiratory tract, its first interactions with the immune system is predominantly at respiratory mucosal surfaces…
Some doctors recommend isolating for up to 30 days after a COVID injection to avoid harming others while shedding pathogenic spike proteins; to avoid getting a SARS-COV-2 infection during first two weeks post-vaccination when the immune system is vulnerable; and, to take preventative measures. See COVID “vaccine” adverse events.
Continued on next page…