Taking Back Our Stolen History
FDA Authorizes The COVID Jab For Kids Five Years and Under
FDA Authorizes The COVID Jab For Kids Five Years and Under

FDA Authorizes The COVID Jab For Kids Five Years and Under

The Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccines have officially been authorized for emergency use in young children by the US Food and Drug Administration to allow vaccination in children as young as 6 months.

The FDA announced the move in a press release on Friday morning. 

However, vaccines cannot officially be given to children until the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine advisers vote to recommend them. The move from the CDC appears to be a simple formality, and a vote is scheduled for Saturday. 

CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky has already signed off on the recommendation. 

Moderna’s vaccine is now authorized for use in children six months through 17 years, and Pfizer/BioNTech’s for children six months through 4 years. 

The latest authorization means that an additional 17 million kids under the age of 5 are now eligible for Covid-19 vaccines.

“Many parents, caregivers and clinicians have been waiting for a vaccine for younger children and this action will help protect those down to 6 months of age. As we have seen with older age groups, we expect that the vaccines for younger children will provide protection from the most severe outcomes of COVID-19, such as hospitalization and death,” FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert M. Califf said in a news release

“Those trusted with the care of children can have confidence in the safety and effectiveness of these COVID-19 vaccines and can be assured that the agency was thorough in its evaluation of the data.”

So far, 49 states have pre-ordered the vaccine for children under five. Only Florida has chosen, under the direction of Governor Ron DeSantis, not to order the vaccine. DeSantis has repeatedly said that the state is opposed to vaccine programs for young children. 

The CDC was later exposed for using highly misleading information when presenting to the vaccine advisory panel that approved the COVID-19 vaccine for children. Shortly after the approval, observers began to point out the misleading information in a disturbing exposure of the agency’s efforts to ensure it was party to injecting kids with a vaccine that is likely not effective or safe. 

The agency featured a pre-print study ranking causes of death in children when presenting to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The apparent urgency led the ACIP to vote and recommend kids aged six months through four years get vaccinated for COVID-19. 

The data in the pre-print study featured subjects between birth and 19 years. However, those involved in the study are primarily in the United Kingdom, where the classification of adult data begins at age 18, so it is unclear why data points for subjects aged 18 to 19 were used. 

One manipulated aspect of the paper, as first pointed out by covid-georgia.com, is that it ranks total cumulative COVID-19 deaths alongside annual rates for other causes of death. This means that the study used multiple years of COVID-19 deaths compared to annual deaths for other morbidities. The manipulated data was also exposed in depth by The Daily Caller this week, leading to more focus on the issue which put America’s children at risk. 

The study ranked the cause of death of the youngest patients as fifth while ranking it as the eighth leading cause of death for all other groups. In every age group in the study, the cumulative COVID-19 death rate is more than double the annualized death rate.

As we have seen in the reporting worldwide since the beginning of the COVID-19 plandemic, the study conflated deaths caused directly by COVID-19 versus those for which COVID-19 was just a “contributing” factor. The study notes in those cases that “we only consider Covid-19 as an underlying (and not contributing) cause of death.”

The study drew its data from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), which calculates COVID-19 deaths using any death certificate on which COVID-19 is mentioned, not just cases where it was the primary reason for death. 

Here’s where you can see data manipulation leading to the panel’s approval of the child vaccine. The NCHS data in the study says there have been 1,433 pediatric COVID-19 deaths through April 30, 2022. But, the CDC’s own data, which counts only deaths where COVID-19 was the leading cause, reported 1,088 pediatric deaths during the same period. That’s a variation of roughly 25% fewer deaths by COVID-19 in children, a marked variation to manipulate data accuracy.

When the CDC data is annualized and only includes deaths where the virus was the primary cause, COVID-19 does not rank as a leading cause of death for young children. A leading cause is defined as being one of the top five reason for a child’s death.

According the CDC’s own data here is how COVID-19 ranks among age groups under age 18 (using a 97%+ faulty PCR test to test sickly kids who died of something else and covid was credited due to manipulation):

  • For infants, COVID-19 ranks 9th, behind influenza and pneumonia, heart disease, and homicide. 
  • Among kids aged 1-4 and 5-9, COVID-19 ranked in a four-way tie for the 8th leading cause of death.
  • For ages 10-14 it ranked in a two-way tie for 8th. 
  • For teens between 15 and 18 years old, it ranks 6th.

Multiple sources have reached out to the CDC for clarification and comment regarding using manipulated data. The CDC’s response is to re-tabulate data from another source and update the pre-print study.

One of those responding, a co-author of the study, Dr. Seth Flaxman, a computer science professor at the Imperial College of London, tweeted after the flaws in the paper were brought to light that the team is working on a revised version to be shared soon. 

Despite the exposure of the fraudulent data, the governing health bodies have approved the vaccine, the United States government began a rollout and funding of the vaccine, and children have started to receive it. 

So, in addition to ignoring the mountain of evidence showing the vaccines are regularly causing life-threatening injuries – especially in healthy children and young people, the FDA ‘experts’ have routinely skipped crucial steps in the testing process, allowing them to manipulate the data in order to suit their desired outcomes.

This inexcusable act of criminal malpractice was confirmed this month by the team leader of the FDA’s clinical review staff, Rachel Zhang, who explained during an advisory panel zoom call that the agency had lost the results from the placebo group during its clinical trials related to the decision to approve the experimental jab for America’s youngest children.

Without this data from the placebo group, the effectiveness of the vaccine cannot be measured against those who did not receive the treatment. Therefore, the clinical trial is meaningless. But the gaping hole in the results apparently doesn’t matter to the ‘experts’ at the FDA, who went ahead with the EUA approval anyway.

“There is no efficacy data,” Zhang explained. “I guess it will have to come from real-world effectiveness,” she added glibly.

In other words, babies and toddlers are essentially vaccine guinea pigs that will provide the lost data. Remember, Zheng is the team leader of the FDA’s clinical review staff, which oversees the approval of new medical treatments.

From Zheng:

“…We have lost the placebo groups, so we cannot really say anything about the duration of vaccine efficacy after that.

There’s no more efficacy data, basically, after that time point. So, unfortunately, we are limited to – in this study – would be the results that we have shown you in the slide with the data cut off. The latest one [placebo group data] would be the May 31st one, and that still is, unfortunately, very few cases…

I guess it will have to come from real-world effectiveness.”  

How does something like this even happen? They don’t even have to come up with a viable excuse anymore. This is literally on par with the old ‘dog ate my homework’ line. What a joke.

Watch, via The Vigilant Fox:

Considering the horrible results of the vaccine across the board when it comes to the basic job of preventing the spread of the virus, it is awfully convenient that the data which would confirm natural immunity in healthy young children is better than the failed experimental jab just happens to disappear.

Nevertheless, despite the myriad of issues, the FDA dutifully approved the vaccine for babies and toddlers just days after Zheng admitted the agency had “no efficacy data.” Because sCiEnCe!

Keep in mind that children have an astonishing 99.995% recovery rate from the virus. The vaccine itself is more than likely worse than the virus itself, as some estimates have pegged the number of children who have died from Covid, as opposed to with it, at zero.

Not only are children effectively in zero danger of this virus, but recent data has shown that they are actually more susceptible to long-term vaccine injury after taking the experimental mRNA jab, especially among young boys. Cases of myocarditis have exploded among young Americans, hitting unprecedented levels ever since the vaccine was made available to those aged 12-17.

With all of the data out there, NOT vaccinating children aged 5 months to 6 years should be a no-brainer. Putting this poison into the arm of an innocent toddler is beyond criminal.