is (or was?) a secretive deep state milieu formed in 2009. Its members were 14 of the world’s richest people, invited by Bill Gates “to save the world“. The billionaires discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to the change they want implemented. The billionaires combined ‘philantropic’ donations of many hundred billion dollars are more than most national budgets. Their money buys a friendly press, cooperative scientists, and compatible politicians. This huge power makes them able to reshape nations according to their will, forcing through structures such as private health care instead of public. Thus their whims and idees fixes totally overrides any democratic wishes.
The billionaires want to bypass democratic checks, and work “independent of government agencies“, in the processing challenging what they scoff at as “some Third World politicians” who disagree with the population reduction plans. Their pet health or scientific theories becomes dominant in the scientific community. Bill Gates effectively bought control over the vast majority of the world’s national and international health organizations. A dirty secret is that the billionaires as often as not makes business profit in the end from their own ‘philanthropy’, through the solutions offered.
Membership:
- Bill Gates
- George Soros
- Warren Buffett
- David Rockefeller
- Ted Turner
- Eli Broad
- Edythe Broad
- Michael Bloomberg
- Oprah Winfrey
- Peter Peterson
- Julian H. Robertson Jr
- John Morgridge
- Tashia Morgridge
- Patty Stonesifer
In addition, these billionaires are a collection of crooks and swindlers. George Soros is a byname for regime changes, Gates is a ruthless monopolist, and Warren Buffett a stock manipulator.
On May 24 of 2009, the Times of London reported in an online article that a secret meeting of the world’s leading billionaires had struck on a plan for curtailing world population. Entitled “Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation,” it told of a gathering in Manhattan that included some of the planet’s richest titans. The Times reported: “Some of America’s leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population….
The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.
Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America’s wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York at the time, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.
The covert palaver took place, revealed the Times story, “at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel Prize-winning biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University.” To what purpose? Patricia Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, attended the confab. She told the Times the billionaires met to “discuss how to increase giving.” But, apparently, they were not simply interested in coordinating their own giving; they want to draft you and me into financially supporting their pet programs as well.
The Times reported that, according to an attendee, “a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.”
“This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,” said the guest. “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.” Bill Gates, it seems, exerted a major influence on their decision. “Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority,” reported the Times.
“Global Cabal,” ?“Alternative World Government”?
“Why all the secrecy?” the Times asked. Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, told the Times the furtiveness might be “because they don’t want to be seen as a global cabal.” An attendee reportedly gave the Times this explanation: “They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government.”
But, are those descriptions — global cabal and alternative world government — unreasonable depictions of what the “Good Club” billionaires were up to? As private citizens, they should be free to shower their billions on whatever charities they deem worthy. But, clearly, in this particular area (and in others as well), they have hi-jacked our government to fund and implement their agenda. According to their anonymous apologist quoted by the Times, they meet secretly because “they need to be independent of government agencies.” All well and good — if they truly were “independent of government agencies.” But just the opposite is true; they are completely intertwined with government agencies, and with the UN agencies that are intertwined with and funded by our government agencies.
The so-called Good Club elite that convened at Sir Paul Nurse’s domicile — Rockefeller, Soros, Gates, et al. — are a top subset of a larger circle of key movers and shakers who do indeed call the shots on global political and economic affairs. And many of them are indeed pushing to transform their various global agendas into eventual formal world government. President Obama’s Global Health Initiative is virtually indistinguishable from the identically named GHI launched by the World Economic Forum in 2002.
The Malthusian fanatics of the Good Club and their fellow billionaire population-control elitists may claim to want “independence” from government, but what they really want is independence from public scrutiny, accountability, and oversight, while at the same time enjoying public financing and government implementation of their programs.
It is precisely because this “global health” agenda was being implemented under the authority of the U.S. government and paid for by the American taxpayers that Congress should have been held accountable. Members of Congress must be forced by public pressure — for fiscal, moral, and constitutional reasons — to investigate and expose any public-private “global cabal,” which does indeed pose a very real danger of becoming an “alternative world government.” Proper investigation and exposure would result in a cut-off of taxpayer funding to GHI projects, especially the most egregious, such as UNFPA, which not only continues to support and fund China’s brutal population control, but also engages in forced sterilization, coercion, bribery, and eugenics throughout the developing world.
Sources:
- The New American
- Wikispooks
