Artificial Intelligence, Microchips, and Musk’s Neuralink
Elon Musk has said ‘We’re Summoning the Demon’ with Artificial Intelligence’. In the past, Musk has expressed doubts about AI. In July 2015, he signed onto “Autonomous Weapons: an Open Letter from AI & Robotics Researchers,” which warned that such devices could “select and engage targets without human intervention.” Yes, out-of-control killer robots! But it concluded that “We believe that AI has great potential to benefit humanity in many ways … Starting a military AI arms race is a bad idea…” The letter was also signed by Diamandis, one of the foremost AI proponents. So it’s fair to say that Musk was simply offering reasonable caution.
In Werner Herzog’s documentary Lo and Behold: Reveries of a Connected World, Musk explained that “I think that the biggest risk is not that the AI will develop a will of its own but rather that it will follow the will of people that establish its utility function.” He offered, “If you were a hedge fund or private equity fund and you said, ‘Well, all I want my AI to do is maximize the value of my portfolio,’ then the AI could decide … to short consumer stocks, go long defense stocks, and start a war.” We wonder if the AI would appreciate that in the long-run, cities in ruins from war would harm the portfolio? In any case, Musk again seems to offer reasonable caution rather than blanket denunciations.
Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum are ecstatic that transhumanist Elon Musk will start testing brain implants in humans in 2022. During a 2017 World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting, Klaus Schwab asked Google co-founder Sergey Brin if he could envision a future where everyone has a brain chip. Big Data digital tools are developing rapidly, said the founder of the WEF. “Can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and you all will have implants – we can measure your brain waves, and I can immediately tell how people react, or I can feel how people react to your answers? Is that imaginable?”
“That’s imaginable,” Brin replied, then sketched a transhumanist future where consciousness is shifted to machines. “You’re basically transplanted to the internet to live forever in the digital world,” he said. “In your biological incarnation, you can then become very old.” Brin added that the direction of technological development is impossible to predict.
In his book “Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” Schwab advocates for a future in which authorities will be able to utilize the blending of technology with the human body to “intrude into the hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and influencing our behavior.”
Transhumanism advocate Elon Musk will be supplying Globalists with the technology they need to invade our brains, leading to mass enslavement and mind control. In 2016, Elon Musk founded Neuralink, a company whose goal is to connect the human brain to a computer. The company is developing an ultra-high bandwidth brain chip to connect humans, computers, and artificial intelligence, what Musk refers to as “a Fitbit in your skull with tiny wires.”
In 2017, Musk expressed the same sentiments as Globalist WEF Founder Klaus Schwab. During the 2017 World Government Summit in Dubai, Musk explained that Artificial Intelligence was progressing so rapidly that humans would have to merge with digital intelligence to become a sort of AI-human hybrid. “Over time, we will probably see a closer merger of biological intelligence and digital intelligence.”
“Some high bandwidth interface to the brain will be something that helps achieve a symbiosis between human and machine intelligence and maybe solves the control problem and the usefulness problem,” said the billionaire futurist.
In 2020, Musk and Neuralink demonstrated their success with implanting just such a chip in pigs, with humans being their next target.
Musk bragged that Neuralink could one day allow people to upload, store, and retrieve memories between bodies and devices. “In the future, you will be able to save and replay memories,” said Musk. “This is obviously sounding increasingly like a Black Mirror episode […] but essential if you have a whole-brain interface, everything that’s encoded in memory, you could upload. So you could basically store your memories as a backup and restore the memories. Then ultimately, you could potentially download them into a new body or into a robot body.”
The fourth industrial revolution will make no distinction between your digital, physical, or biological self. If a memory can be downloaded and uploaded to a new body, it can most certainly be erased or otherwise altered, and the victim would never know the difference.
In 2021, he touted Neurlink’s progress in a new video in which he claims a 9-year-old macaque monkey is playing ping-pong with his mind. Neuralinks were placed on each side of Pager’s brain, according to the video. The links track the parts of the brain focused on hand and arm movements and record the neural activity.
Elon Musk has confirmed that he will start testing brain implants in humans by the end of 2022.
As Yuval Noah Harari, chief advisor to the World Economic Forum’s leader, Klaus Schwab, recently stated, “Dictators always dreamt about eliminating privacy, monitoring everyone, knowing everything you do, think, and feel…It is now possible.” However, he forgot to mention is it “possible” because of men like Elon Musk and his company Neuralink.
Musk on synthetic mRNA and claim that “the humans will become hybrids!”
On Twitter, Musk announced another method by which we could create “symbiosis with machines” — neural lace. Science Alert describes neural lace as, “a brain implant that can augment natural intelligence by hooking us up to computers.”
X Æ A-12
Musk is, it appears, placing his actions behind his words, naming his son a string of letters and numbers that’s more reminiscent of a “Star Wars”-style robot than a human child. Grimes and Musk welcomed their baby boy X AE A-XII, affectionately known as baby X, to the world in May 2020 after the pair had been dating from 2018. Y’s older brother was originally named X Æ A-12 but Musk and Grimes had to change it to X AE A-XII to remove the Æ and 12 so that his birth certificate would comply with California law.
Exa Dark Sideræl Musk
Grimes and the Musk secretly welcomed their 2nd baby, a girl, Exa Dark Sideræl, together in December 2021 via a surrogate. This was revealed during her Vanity Fair cover shoot when the reported heard the baby wailing upstairs and Grimes was forced to reveal her daughter. According to Vanity Fair, Grimes and Musk named their daughter Exa Dark Sideræl because Exa comes from the computing term exaFlops. The middle part of the name, Dark, refers to the beautiful unknown mystery of dark matter in the universe. And Sideræl, pronounced “sigh-deer-ee-el” is “a more elven” take on the word sidereal which means star or deep space time, an alternative to earth time. Sidereal means “The true time of the universe, star time, deep space time, not our relative earth time,” Grimes explained. It is also a nod to Grimes’ favorite character Galadriel, from Lord of the Rings.
Elon’s first five kids with first wife Justine were all boys: Damian, Kai, Xavier, Saxon, and Griffin.1 The couple lost their first son Nevada Alexander Musk at 10 weeks old in 2002 to sudden infant death syndrome.
Other than the occasional right-of-center opinion, Musk is a technology-obsessed billionaire with little sense of respect for the inherent dignity of humans as created in the image of God. Eternal life is only worth pursuing if we have any idea what “life” really is. Is it a simulation or a divine miracle? Musk wants brain implants so we can live forever. After all, who doesn’t want to live forever? But Musk never considers if humanity is more than a data set, and the question of life is not merely whether we can keep said data set “running.” There is a mystery to human life which should remain at the mercy of the Creator. At best, his philosophy is a decent method of managed defeat to the technological overlords bent on ushering in the era of transhumanism.
Spacex
His recent book informs us of how the Muskrat, just age 30 at the time, travelled to what was then a chaotic and collapsing Russia in 2001, and again in 2002. These mysterious trips were part of a fruitless attempt to buy an ICBM! From the Daily Mail from May 14, 2015:
Russian Space Bosses SPAT on Elon Musk When He Tried to Buy a Rocket
“He nevertheless went with Musk to Moscow, and once there they began trying to convince the Russians to sell them an intercontinental ballistic missile… ‘One of their chief designers spat on me and Elon because he thought we were full of s***,’ Cantrell said, according to the book by Ashlee Vance. The team returned empty-handed.
In February 2002 the group returned to Russia, this time bringing Mike Griffin, who had worked for the CIA’s venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel,’ according to the excerpt on Bloomberg. Musk was now looking for not one but three missiles and had a briefcase full of cash, too.
Musk asked point-blank how much a missile would cost.
‘Eight million dollars each, they said. Musk countered, offering $8 million for two. ‘They sat there and looked at him,’ Cantrell said. ‘And said something like, ‘Young boy. No.’
Musk stormed out of that meeting, and on the plane home began devising a plan to create his own rockets.”
So, a then 30-year-old kid appears out of nowhere, and shows up in corrupted Russia (only Putin’s 2nd year) with a CIA finance agent at his side, and a briefcase containing $8,000,000 cash, hoping to buy a Russian ICBM?
[Jul 28, 2017] Elon Musk Admits SpaceX is a NOT a Private Space Company. SpaceX may very well be the deep state’s privatized version for space technology just as Facebook and Google are their privatized spy grid to avoid oversight and accountability from Congress.5G Satellites
Companies and governments have plans to launch approximately 50,000 satellites to provide 5G and Wi-Fi services everywhere on Earth. Elon Musk’s SpaceX is leading these efforts with its planned deployment of 42,000 Starlink satellites and its goal of establishing a global network.
To provide service, SpaceX states that it requires an infrastructure of one million on-the-ground antennas to connect its satellites with the ground users. In March 2020, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved SpaceX’s ground antenna application. On 7/31/2020, SpaceX modified its original filing and has asked the FCC to increase this number to five million. Almost 400 satellites have been launched to date. This year, SpaceX plans to accelerate its satellite launches to an average of 120 per month (60 every two weeks). Space X is approaching the threshold number at which it says it can begin supplying 5G coverage from space. This year, SpaceX plans to accelerate its satellite launches to an average of 120 per month (60 every two weeks). In July, the FCC approved 6 Ground Stations to communicate with the satellites – in California, Minnesota, Idaho, Alabama, Georgia and Montana.
These low-orbit satellites not only already contaminate our night skies and interfere with astronomy but also promise to flood Earth with powerful, focused electromagnetic beams that emit radiofrequency (RF) and microwave radiation proven to adversely affect the health of humans, animals and plants. The satellites also may have an impact on Earth’s natural electromagnetic field—essential to all life on our planet—yet no national or international agency has taken action to evaluate, reduce, prevent or publicize the environmental impact of the satellites’ emissions. Meanwhile, significant effects are already occurring.
The FCC has never assessed the impact of radiation emissions from 50,000 satellites or any other existing and potential adverse environmental effects.
Elon Musk’s Starlink satellites are already causing harm. As reported by Forbes and both professional and amateur astronomers, the light pollution produced by mega-constellations of satellites “pose[s] an existential threat to astronomy,” potentially ending “ground-based astronomy as we know it.” Musk misleadingly asserts that the Starlink satellites will have “no material effect on discoveries in astronomy,” despite the fact that the large and highly reflective Starlink satellites already in orbit are leaving a damaging light trail. The abnormal emissions of satellite-reflected light also do more than ruin astronomy; they interfere with the ability of migratory birds, seals, moths, frogs and other creatures to orient themselves and navigate at night using the starry sky.
If SpaceX’s plans materialize, the number of its satellites will far outnumber the approximately 9,000 stars visible to the naked eye. As of late 2019, the first 122 Starlink satellites were already brighter than the majority of the 9,000 stars, with only 172 stars shining brighter than Musk’s satellites. On January 10, 2020, concerned astronomers launched their own international appeal to “safeguard the astronomical sky,” requesting that Starlink launches be put on hold and asking governments to abide by existing treaties addressing environmental risks, including the 1967 Outer Space Treaty and the 2018 United Nations Guidelines for the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities. To date, over 1,890 professional astronomers from 48 countries have signed the appeal. Although Musk and SpaceX claim they will work on reducing the satellites’ reflective power and will “tweak” satellite orientation for astronomical experiments, SpaceX should not be allowed to keep launching satellites before it has addressed these serious issues and problems.2
Elon Musk indicates that he does not pray to or worship any divine being. However, he asked “any entities that [were] listening” to “bless [the] launch” before the important Falcon 1 launch by SpaceX, a company he founded in 2002.[2]
On April 25, 2022, it was announced that Twitter had been sold to Tesla CEO and SpaceX founder Elon Musk for $43 billion.[12] Earlier in the month, Musk had become the biggest single shareholder of Twitter (with 9.2% of the shares, well over the 2.25% held by Jack Dorsey) when he bought 73 million shares of stock in the company (worth $2.89 billion),[13] but when he attempted to buy more shares, he ran into resistance from several Saudi Arabian Twitter shareholders, which cause Twitter stock to fall.[14] To prevent Musk from buying more shares, Twitter tried to entice him with a seat on its board of directors as part of a deal that would keep him from owning more than 14.9% of its common stock,[15] but Musk turned down that offer, thereby allowing him to buy more Twitter stock.[16] In response, bitter leftist Twitter shareholders attempted to sue Musk for delaying in disclosing the amount of stock he owned in the company.[17]
When Musk announced plans to purchase Twitter outright and turn it into a private company,[18] pro-censorship/anti-free speech leftist company management decided to attempt to implement a “poison pill” to sabotage the transaction and fight for censorship and silencing of conservative voices and allowing the voices of liberals and other enemies of freedom to flourish[19] rather than allow Musk, who is anti-censorship and favors free speech, to buy the company and put an end to that censorship.[20] In response to the “poison pill” move by Twitter, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis threatened to hold the company’s board of directors legally accountable for breaching their fiduciary duty.[21] Musk later announced that he would be bringing investor partners into his Twitter bid to thwart the company’s “poison pill” sabotage attempt, whose legality was questioned by the Gateway Pundit.[22] In an attempt to protect Twitter and its anti-free speech mandate against a Musk takeover, the Biden regime-controlled Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission tried to step in by launching frivolous sham investigations against Musk.[23]
When Musk’s purchase of Twitter became official, pearl-clutching liberals went into meltdown mode[24] over their loss of control of one of their means of censoring free speech and silencing conservative voices/opinions and factual information.[12] President Donald Trump congratulated Musk on his purchase of Twitter, saying of him “…I hope Elon buys Twitter because he’ll make improvements to it and he is a good man,” but he added that he will not return to Twitter, even with the restoration of his account there, choosing instead to stay with his own social media platform Truth Social.[25] As part of the announcement of his Twitter purchase, Musk said, “Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated…”, adding in a tweet that “I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means”.[26] Among the liberals having tantrums over Musk’s purchase of Twitter are actress and leftist activist Jameela Jamil, who rage-quit the platform over the announcement in a petulant tweet,[27] liberal race activist Shaun King (a white man who claims to be “black”), who also threw an online hissy-fit and rage-quit Twitter via deletion of his account in response to the Musk purchase,[28] Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (who once delusionally claimed that people who criticize her for her support of socialism and her cluelessness about politics and the real world want to “date” her[29]),[30] and other prominent liberals with online presences such as Joy Reid, Howard Dean, NBC “journalist”/hack Ben Collins, CNN hack Brian Stelter, former Twitter employees Israel Camacho and Laura Gomez and several members of hate group Antifa.[31] Some of the more deranged and immature liberals on Twitter are now calling for Musk to be killed in response to his purchase of the platform.[32]
At American Thinker, it warned:[33]
Do not expect the establishment to surrender; they will not let go without a prolonged dirty war, like the one they are still waging against Trump.
With the Musk takeover, Twitter has begun reinstating conservative accounts that were wrongly suspended under the previous liberal regime for telling the truth about subjects that liberals do not like, such as Democrat election fraud, the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop computer and the damage being done by CCP flu “vaccines”, as well as locking down changes to the site’s source code to prevent vindictive liberal Twitter employees from doing damage to the platform out of childish spite; among those whose accounts were reinstated include Tucker Carlson, the Babylon Bee[34] and Marjorie Taylor Greene.[35] According to Bizpac Review, there is apparently no longer a Twitter board of directors (who may have either been fired or resigned en masse following the Musk takeover), while embittered Twitter employees childishly vented against their new boss, accusing him of “…being a troll and ignorant of Twitter policies” and criticizing his “…inability to monitor toxicity on the platform” (both of which said employees and their comrades are guilty of themselves by allowing liberals to run wild and do and say as they pleased on Twitter while censoring and silencing conservatives in violation of the First Amendment).[36]
It was later reported that high-profile liberals with Twitter accounts (including celebrities and politicians) were losing followers by the thousands (or even tens of thousands) following the Musk takeover as it was discovered that their so-called “followers” were actually bots created by liberals (including by liberal Twitter employees[37]) to artificially inflate the number of followers of said high-profile liberals to dishonestly make it appear they had larger followings than they really have; the bots are disappearing at a rapid rate ahead of an expected bot purge to be conducted by Musk to eliminate fake Twitter accounts as part of the restoration of free speech to the platform and the end of liberal attempts to crowd out/diminish/censor/silence opposing voices and viewpoints.[38] As part of that swing, over 70% of Republican politicians with Twitter accounts reported gaining followers (including Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan, who saw the biggest single gain with 63,735 followers), while out of 270 Democrat politicians on Twitter, 268 lost followers (including Nancy Pelosi and Bernie Sanders, who lost 14,432 and 21,640 respectively) due to the disappearance of the bot accounts.[39] Following the Musk takeover, European Union Commissioner of the Internal Market Thierry Breton claimed that the EU would attempt to ban Twitter from operating in Europe through its specious use of regulations, a move which drew praise from Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.[40]
Democrat politicians such as Elizabeth Warren, who were in favor of letting Twitter do as it pleased under liberal ownership and did all it could to run interference for it and protect it and its lawless actions against regulation and sanctions by the Trump administration, did an about-face following the Musk purchase and, out of fearful concern of their crimes and misdeeds being exposed (and especially the return of President Trump to Twitter) now that Musk is restoring free speech to the platform and ending censorship there, suddenly and hypocritically became in favor of regulating Twitter, with Warren in particular advocating for a “wealth tax” and regulation of Big Tech that would specifically target Twitter and conservative social media platforms, claiming that Twitter’s purchase by Musk and its subsequent restoration of free speech for conservatives would be “…dangerous for our democracy”.[41]
On Apr 27, 2022, Musk condemned Twitter censorship of NY Post’s Hunter laptop story: ‘Obviously incredibly inappropriate.’ Top Twitter executive Vijaya Gadde was said to be responsible for the decision in 2020.[42]
On July 8, 2022, Musk sent a letter to Twitter terminating his buyout bid after they refused to comply with his requests for the platform to disclose the bot info and after news broke that the company was blocking more than a million spam accounts per day. Twitter, after initially claiming they wouldn’t sell to him, then filed a lawsuit against Musk for not going through with the deal.
Sources:
- https://www.insidehook.com/article/history/errol-musk-elon-father-myths
- https://steemit.com/space/@corbettreport/all-hail-elon-s-martian-technocracy
- https://www.dailygrail.com/2017/06/wtf-this-1949-science-fiction-novel-by-a-legendary-rocket-designer-names-the-leader-of-martian-civilization-as-elon/
- https://www.dailygrail.com/2017/06/wtf-this-1949-science-fiction-novel-by-a-legendary-rocket-designer-names-the-leader-of-martian-civilization-as-elon/
- https://transhumanist-party.org/tag/elon-musk/
- https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/12/elon-musks-disturbing-dalliance-with-transhumanism/
- https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/what-you-should-know-about-5g-satellites-how-musks-sci-fi-dreams-are-becoming-our-living-nightmare/
