In short, social engineering is an organized attempt by Illuminati front organizations to brain-wash the global populace into accepting the destruction of national sovereignty, as a precursor to the establishment of a global totalitarian government.
The Tavistock Institute published a report in 1974 which revealed that environmentalist, New Age and religious organizations are, in actuality, all part of a unified, planned social engineering conspiracy. At the request of the Institute’s director, Dr. Willis Harmon, key elements of the report were published in book form as The Aquarian Conspiracy by Harmon protégé Marilyn Ferguson. The last thing that the Illuminati wants is a populace which thinks for itself, something most New Agers fail to do, relying instead upon books and lectures promulgated by disinformers and kooks. The recent New Age emphasis on angels, for instance, has only occurred because New Agers have failed to determine the earthly origins of the angel myth.
The current social engineering tactics used by the Anglo-American-Zionist NWO (New World Order), or the US-UK-Israeli axis, can be decoded if you look carefully. These social engineering tactics are being used around the world, both internally (within nations under the thumb of this cabal) and externally (geopolitically between nations), all with the point of maneuvering the world into a centralized totalitarian dictatorship. The NWO controllers like to use a combination of tactics, but the bottom line or common denominator in all of them is the invention of fictional threats and the intentional creation of problems that don’t really exist (or that never needed to have existed). In other words: fear. However, the crafty way these social engineering tactics manifest is worth studying and becoming acquainted with, so you can protect yourself against the propaganda and subtle deception which so easily takes in the majority of the world population – though hopefully not much longer due to the rising consciousness of humanity.
External Threats: The Russian Threat, The Iranian Threat, Islamic Terrorism
It has been said many times in many ways that Government needs war to survive and to justify its own existence. The EU has been facing all sorts of crises in the last few years. Many of them have involved secession from the union, which culminated in the Brexit vote on June 23rd 2016, and which may have a domino effect if countries like Denmark or the Netherlands follow suit. However, countries are less likely to secede (and have to handle their own defense) if there’s a big, scary, land-grabbing superpower like Russia close by. The fake Russian threat is also a great way for NATO to expand its territory by convincing small Eastern European nations that they’d better join for their own sake. The trouble is, there’s no evidence at all that Russia is interested in aggressively expanding its land and attacking Europe. We do know for a fact, however, that CIA-bribed journalists in Germany are paid to write Russophobic propaganda, that NATO is attempting to bring its missiles closer to Russia in line with the Wolfowitz doctrine, and that the US overthrew Ukraine courtesy of Zionist neocons, US$5 billion and with the subterfuge of Vicky “Fuck the EU” Nuland. Furthermore, according to a recent poll of 800, the people of Crimea, 96% of whom voted in a referendum to join Russia, still overwhelmingly stand by their decision to join Russia.
The same goes for the Iranian threat. The Anglo-American-Zionist MSM (Mainstream Media) loves to hype the supposed Iranian threat, as do Israeli sycophants like John McCain and Lindsey Graham, but the truth is that Iran is fully in compliance with the nuclear deal and there is no evidence it’s using nuclear power for weapons, as affirmed by all 16 US military intelligence agencies a few years ago. And as for Islamic terrorism … what a charged and deceptive term that has become. Have you ever wondered why all these supposed Islamic jihadi fundamentalist terrorists drink alcohol, gamble and sleep around so much? Remember how supposed 9/11 ringleader Mohammad Atta was found gambling in Florida? Or when the alleged Saudi hijackers left copies of the Quran in the bars where they were getting lap dances? Or why people linked to the Israeli Mossad like Richard Gutjahr just happened to be around during both the Nice attack and the Germany attack (two recent European false flag attacks blamed on Islamic terrorism) to take photographs? Or why ISIS drives around in Toyota trucks kindly donated by the US State Department? As the Saker puts it:
“… the perpetrators are absolutely ridiculous: pseudo-Muslims who turn out to be drinking homosexuals, ex-patients of mental institutions – the kind of people I call “overnight Muslims”: they all make darn sure to say Allahu Akbar a number of times, but other than that, they have no sign of Islam at all …”
“The problem with all that nonsense is that there is exactly zero real evidence that any of these terrorists had any real Islamic education or beliefs. Besides, even if every single one of them turned out to be a deeply religious and pious Muslim, that would hardly prove anything. The IRA was “Roman Catholic” and yet nobody spoke of a “Catholic threat”. True, there is a very real threat to the entire Middle-East from the Daesh crazies (yes, the very same ones whom the US wants the Russians to stop bombing), but there is no evidence whatsoever of any real subordination/coordination between the Takfiris in the Middle-East and the perpetrators of the recent mass murders in the USA and Europe.”
Islamic terrorism is not exactly a real and independent phenomenon, because it’s been created, coddled, controlled and funded by the US-UK-Israeli axis for decades. It’s not Islamic terrorism; it’s Zio-Islamic terrorism. When we investigate closely, we find the traces of Zionist Israel in so many false flag events since 9/11 in so many Western countries. Islamic terrorism benefits the US and UK powerbrokers since it’s a contrived and controlled enemy they can use to justify more wars and more laws, but most of all, it benefits Israel, since Israel is surrounded by Islamic countries who it is trying to dominate, and “Islamic terrorism” gives it the excuse to get billions from the US and subjugate its Arab “enemies”.
Internal Strife: Mass Migration, Islamic Invasion, Black Lives Matter
At the same time as using social engineering tactics of fake eternal threats and enemies, the NWO manipulators also use a variety of internal threats to whip up domestic strife. Most of the current domestic social engineering tactics revolve around polarization: creating new classes, groups and movements in opposition to others, in order to play them off against each other. It’s the same old strategy of divide and rule or divide and conquer. The mass migration to Europe which some have dubbed an “Islamic invasion” has been a wonderful piece of social engineering for the NWO. Look how it benefits them: it creates chaos(from which a new order can be created in Freemasonic Ordo-Ab-Chao style); it makes people afraid (since some of the refugees refuse to assimilate and want to impose their culture [in some cases Sharia Law] on their new nation); it makes people confused (since there are numerous conflicting reports and viewpoints on the issue); it makes people distracted (from the source of what is really controlling them); and it allows the State to justify more draconian lawsin the name of restoring order.
Funnily enough, by coincidence or design, the refugee crisis faced by the EU is mirrored by the race baiting/race wars experienced in the US. I will again defer to the Saker for his commentary:
“Ideally, the European population should become polarized between, on one hand, those who pretend they like the refugees are no problem at all, and those who blame everything on them. The more polarized the society becomes, the more there will be a “need” to keep law and order. Does that all look familiar to you?
Yes, of course, this is also exactly what is happening in the USA with the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement.
While there are plenty of immigrants in the USA, they are mostly Hispanics and Asians who adapt rather well to US society. The good news for the US “deep state” is that Blacks in the USA can very much accomplish the same function as the refugees do in Europe: they are a vocal, mostly deeply alienated minority, with a great deal of pent-up anger against the rest of society which can very easily be set-off to create riots and commit crimes. It is also rather easy to find a few crazies amongst these Blacks to start murdering policemen (the ideal symbol of the oppressive White establishment) and create a sense of crisis acute enough to justify the use of police, National Guard and, potentially, military forces to restore and uphold “law and order”.”
As the Saker also writes, the current social engineering tactics are in fact a combination of a “a diffuse/vague external threat (Islam) and an easily identifiable internal “carrier” threat (refugees in Europe, Blacks in the USA).”The BLM movement is another polarizing movement. Of course, we must ensure we don’t have a racist or discriminatory police force. Yet, as with all things like this, there is more to the story. In American cities today, blacks are disproportionately incarcerated and shot by the police, and at the same time, they are also disproportionately criminal. It’s a cultural problem, and to really solve it, you would have to investigate why black men are being led to crime. There’s no short and easy answer here.
In addition to these current external and internal social engineering tactics, some old ones are still operating, namely subversion. The CIA, George Soros and his slew of NGOs (Non Governmental Organizations) are still trying to overtake the world through coup and overthrow. Soros’ NGOs would better be named Subversion Organizations, since their primary function appears to be getting legal access to foreign countries, gaining a foothold, creating uprisings (like color revolutions) and overthrowing legitimately-elected governments.
Reverse the Impact Social Engineering Tactics by Integrating Opposing Views
All in all, although we are being inundated with a variety of social engineering tactics, these techniques are easy to spot once you know the agenda is to foment opponents, threats and enemies. The antidote will be to remember that nothing is black and white, that Life is shades of grey, and that there are often many valid viewpoints to single situation or issue. Part of the job of seeing through the fear propaganda and social engineering is to reverse its impact by integrating and finding commonality among the polarized groups and viewpoints – and as always digging deeper to investigate the force behind it all.
Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com (FaceBook here), writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance
In recent decades, the consensus has emerged at the annual Davos meetings that the world needs a revolution, and that reforms have taken too long. The members of the WEF envision a profound upheaval at short notice. The time span should be so brief that most people will hardly realize that a revolution is going on. The change must be so swift and dramatic that those who recognize that a revolution is happening do not have the time to mobilize against it.
The lockdown in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic has accelerated the implementation of long-held plans to establish a so-called new world order. Under the auspices of the World Economic Forum (WEF), global policymakers are advocating for a “Great Reset” with the intent of creating a global technocracy. It is not by coincidence that on October 18, 2019, in New York City the WEF participated in “Event 201” at the “high-level” pandemic exercise organized by the John Hopkins Center for Health Security.
This coming technocracy involves close cooperation between the heads of the digital industry and of governments. With programs such as guaranteed minimum income and healthcare for all, the new kind of governance combines strict societal control with the promise of comprehensive social justice.
The truth, however, is that this new world order of digital tyranny comes with a comprehensive social credit system. The People’s Republic of China is the pioneer of this method of surveillance and control of individuals, corporations, and sociopolitical entities.
For the individual, one’s identity is reduced to an app or chip that registers almost any personal activity. In order to gain a few individual rights, and be it only to travel to a certain place, a person must balance such apparent privileges with his submission to a web of regulations that define in detail what is “good behavior” and deemed as beneficial to humankind and the environment. For example, during a pandemic, this sort of control would extend from the obligation of wearing a mask and practicing social distancing to having specific vaccinations in order to apply for a job or to travel.
It is, in short, a type of social engineering which is the opposite of a spontaneous order or of development. Like the mechanical engineer with a machine, the social engineer—or technocrat—treats society as an object. Different from the brutal suppressions by the totalitarianism of earlier times, the modern social engineer will try to make the social machine work on its own according to the design. For this purpose, the social engineer must apply the laws of society the way the mechanical engineer follows the laws of nature. Behavioral theory has reached a stage of knowledge that makes the dreams of social engineering possible. The machinations of social engineering operate not through brute force, but subtly by nudge.
Under the order envisioned by the Great Reset, the advancement of technology is not meant to serve the improvement of the conditions of the people but to submit the individual to the tyranny of a technocratic state. “The experts know better” is the justification.
The ideology of the World Economic Forum is neither left nor right, nor progressive or conservative, it is also not fascist or communist, but outright technocratic. As such, it includes many elements of earlier collectivist ideologies.