For former Western Europe, the year 2004 changed everything, and so (to use one of the favourites in the communist vocabulary) quite irreversibly: The European Union, that had been so far a mere West European club (if one accepts the bloc-free and socialist-leaning countries of Sweden, Finland, and Austria as Western nations, in the first place), saw its first big enlargement deep into the still-communist East, from 15 to 25 member states. Malta and Cyprus aside, 3 “former” Soviet republics and 5 “former” communist satellites joined the EU, immediately changing the whole fabric of EU institutions, whether the European Parliament or, finally, the European Commission itself, where henceforth Western, “bourgeois” politicians resp. bureaucrats (mostly socialists themselves anyway) were to be working side by side with unchanged Marxist-Leninist nomenklaturists from Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary, and Slovenia (Romania and Bulgaria were to follow in 2007; Croatia, in 2013; and the process just goes on and is of course designed to bring about a complete merger of once-Western Europe with the whole of the communist East, including the still-intact USSR, which Gorbachev and Shevardnadze thirty years ago used to term a “Common European Home from the Atlantic to Vladivostok”, that is an all-communist Eurasia; Angela Merkel sometimes uses this phrase too). For this geopolitical seismic shift to be set into legal force, a more than ominous date was chosen, presumably as an additional element of silent triumph on behalf of the communists: It wasn’t the 1st of January, or of April, or July, it was the 1st of May, the highday of international communism/socialism, when these still-communist states entered the European Union! How bold! But was there any explanation or analysis provided by the media? None! As German Foreign Minister of the day Joschka Fischer (of the Greens, a Marxist streetfighter himself back in the seventies, and still a Marxist today) met his Polish colleague at midnight in the middle of Oder bridge at Frankfurt/Oder, amidst splendid fireworks, these treacherous media kept silent as to what all of this really meant for the nations of so-far-Western Europe! Meanwhile the so-called Schengen territory was extended by some of these communist states so that the initial idea of it, namely effective border protection for the Western European nations against Eastern Europe, is gone; it’s now all an undivided, open space, where (secret-service-controlled) organised crime and what not from the East can operate completely free and unchecked, directly into the West European space. Thus, it is no exaggeration to say the (Western) European nation state is dead. -–As one further side note: Joschka Fischer, during his seven years as German Foreign Minister from 1998 till 2005, quite obviously was directly and personally responsible for the organised, yet official smuggling in of millions of East Europeans into the “Golden West” by handing out to applicants in the Ukraine, in Belarus, Moldova, Russia itself, and so forth, “tourist visa” for Germany without the slightest background checks, particularly regarding their financial capability. Given the horrendous numbers, it went indeed into the millions, it is extremely unlikely that all these people could actually afford a “journey” over into expensive Western Europe. What happened was that the German embassies in those Eastern countries were ordered by Berlin to basically grant these tourist visa without further adue. As soon as the story broke, it naturally became a huge political scandal, but Herr Fischer simply laughed at the German Bundestag while being interrogated in early 2005 for fourteen long hours, even schooling them that the days of nation-state thinking are now over anyway. Tellingly, nothing came of it, Herr Fischer is still a free man, and to this day no one knows fur sure what happened to those millions of “tourists” from brotherly Eastern Europe …
Official and solemn Sino-Soviet “reconciliation”: Vladimir Putin and Hu Jintao establish an overt strategic alliance, very symbolically illustrated by China declaring 2006 the “Year of Russia”, followed by Russia declaring 2007 the “Year of China”! Thus, Soviet premier defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s prediction has materialised that the fake Sino-Soviet split would at some point give way to a belligerent policy of “one clenched fist” by these two communist powers, along with the whole of the rest of the communist bloc!
February 10, 2007, Munich, Germany: At the 43rd annual Munich Security Conference that always takes place at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof, that year under the motto “Global Crises – Global Responsibility”, then and from May 2012 again President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, delivered a rather unfriendly early Valentine’s Day present for his “partners” in the West: a most aggressive, threatening, and Leninistically bold speech that came as a total surprise and certainly caused a lot of headache in Western political circles as it mercilessly destroyed all illusions of an American-dominated “unipolar” world. Worse, during the whole speech Putin appeared to be almost exploding with cold fury (this author watched it live on Bavarian television; there is a full recording on the Youtube channel “PernatyZmey”). Whatever calculated Putin’s “fury” may have been, it showed more clearly than anything else during the previous years that the Russians “mean it”; mean what, unfortunately, seems still not to have been understood to this day, i.e. communist world dominion, in other words: a “unipolar” world controlled by them! Some key passages (taken from www.ag-friedensforschung.de/themen/Sicherheitskonferenz/2007-putin.html; the website gives the official English translation from the website of the President of the Russian Federation, www.president.kremlin.ru): “[…] The unipolar world that had been proposed after the Cold War did not take place either. The history of humanity certainly has gone through unipolar periods and seen aspirations to world supremacy. And what hasn’t happened in world history? However, what is a unipolar world? However one might embellish this term, at the end of the day it refers to one type of situation, namely one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making. It is a world in which there is one master, one sovereign. And at the end of the day this is pernicious not only for all those within this system, but also for the sovereign itself because it destroys itself from within. And this certainly has nothing in common with democracy. Because, as you know, democracy is the power of the majority in light of the interests and opinions of the minority. Incidentally, Russia – we – are constantly being taught about democracy. But for some reason those who teach us do not want to learn themselves. […] We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law. And independent legal norms are, as a matter of fact, coming increasingly closer to one state’s legal system. One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this? In international relations we increasingly see the desire to resolve a given question according to so-called issues of political expediency, based on the current political climate. And of course this is extremely dangerous. It results in the fact that no one feels safe. I want to emphasise this – no one feels safe! Because no one can feel that international law is like a stone wall that will protect them. Of course such a policy stimulates an arms race. […] Madam Federal Chancellor [Angela Merkel] already mentioned this. The combined GDP measured in purchasing power parity of countries such as India and China is already greater than that of the United States. And a similar calculation with the GDP of the BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – surpasses the cumulative GDP of the EU. And according to experts this gap will only increase in the future. There is no reason to doubt that the economic potential of the new centres of global economic growth will inevitably be converted into political influence and will strengthen multipolarity. […] Did not our country have a peaceful transition to democracy? Indeed, we witnessed a peaceful transformation of the Soviet regime – a peaceful transformation! And what a regime! With what a number of weapons, including nuclear weapons! Why should we start bombing and shooting now at every available opportunity? Is it the case when without the threat of mutual destruction we do not have enough political culture, respect for democratic values and for the law? […] Plans to expand certain elements of the anti-missile defence system to Europe cannot help but disturb us. Who needs the next step of what would be, in this case, an inevitable arms race? I deeply doubt that Europeans themselves do. Missile weapons with a range of about five to eight thousand kilometres that really pose a threat to Europe do not exist in any of the so-called problem countries. And in the near future and prospects, this will not happen and is not even foreseeable. And any hypothetical launch of, for example, a North Korean rocket to American territory through Western Europe obviously contradicts the laws of ballistics. As we say in Russia, it would be like using the right hand to reach the left ear. […] But what is happening at the same time? Simultaneously the so-called flexible frontline American bases with up to five thousand men in each. It turns out that NATO has put its frontline forces on our borders, and we continue to strictly fulfil the treaty [on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe] obligations and do not react to these actions at all. I think that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernisation of the Alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust. And we have the right to ask: against whom is this expansion intended? And what happened to the assurances our Western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are those declarations today? No one even remembers them. But I will allow myself to remind this audience what was said. I would like to quote the speech of NATO General Secretary Mr Woerner in Brussels on 17 May 1990. He said at the time that “the fact that we are ready not to place a NATO army outside of German territory gives the Soviet Union a firm security guarantee”. Where are these guarantees? The stones and concrete blocks of the Berlin Wall have long been distributed as souvenirs. But we should not forget that the fall of the Berlin Wall was possible thanks to a historic choice – one that was also made by our people, the people of Russia – a choice in favour of democracy, freedom, openness and a sincere partnership with all the members of the big European family. And now they are trying to impose new dividing lines and walls on us – these walls may be virtual but they are nevertheless dividing, ones that cut through our continent. And is it possible that we will once again require many years and decades, as well as several generations of politicians, to dissemble and dismantle these new walls? […] In conclusion I would like to note the following. We very often – and personally, I very often – hear appeals by our partners, including our European partners, to the effect that Russia should play an increasingly active role in world affairs. In connection with this I would allow myself to make one small remark. It is hardly necessary to incite us to do so. Russia is a country with a history that spans more than a thousand years and has practically always used the privilege to carry out an independent foreign policy. We are not going to change this tradition today. At the same time, we are well aware of how the world has changed and we have a realistic sense of our own opportunities and potential. And of course we would like to interact with responsible and independent partners with whom we could work together in constructing a fair and democratic world order that would ensure security and prosperity not only for a select few, but for all.” That latter statement, “a fair and democratic world order that would ensure security and prosperity not only for a select few, but for all”, shows without doubt they’re indeed still headed for world communism. In these extracts one can see as clear as the blue sky that the unchanged Soviets will do everything to manoeuvre American military presence out from the European continent, engage the Europeans in an ever tighter cooperation in all spheres that would finally mean a merger between the EU and the so-called Russian Federation, on communist terms, and leave the U.S. in complete political and military isolation. Given Putin’s mentioning of the growing economic and political power of Brazil, Russia, India and China (the so-called BRIC states, meanwhile extended by South Africa into BRICS: indeed bricks in their ever rising all-communist world architecture), one can see coming on the horizon what Stalin once said had to be achieved: the change of the encirclement of socialism by capitalism to the encirclement of capitalism by socialism. Putin’s speech was an open demonstration of unchanged Soviet hatred against the one great obstacle on their way to an all-communist world, the United States of America. And the psychological effect on quite a number of Western politicians seems indeed to have been devastating.
Oddly, just hours after this “game-changing” speech by Putin in Munich, Germany, another major event – equally relevant to the world revolution – took place on that same February 10, 2007 at Springfield, Illinois, where far-left U.S. Democratic Senator Barack Hussein Obama announced his running for the office of President of the United States, and so on an ominously freezing-cold Illinois winter day, already speaking of his intention to “transform” America. The location of the old Springfield State Capitol Building had been chosen deliberately, as it was here, in the former capital of the state of Illinois, that Abraham Lincoln, later to be the President who finally did away with slavery, gave his famous June 1858 “House Divided” speech that summed up the pre-Civil War crisis of the American Union. So typical of the boldness of the revolutionary hard left, they adopted Abraham Lincoln as their icon for an aggressive anti-white black racism that has had nothing to do with unifying and everything to do with division and polarisation. And look where the country stands today: it has truly become a house divided – which is what Alinsky-style “community organising” is all about: create conflict and seize power (and should you “lose” power again, go berserk and obstruct the new administration no matter what).
Nov. 9, 2009, Berlin, twentieth anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall, actually a perfidious celebration on the part of the communists: Ahead of the various official commemoration events there was a highly symbolical occurrence much less covered by the media, namely an all-East-German/communist crossing of a bridge from former East Berlin into former West Berlin, a bridge ironically named by the East German communist regime in the 1950s “Bösebrücke” after a German communist “martyr” who had died in Hitlers’ concentration camp machine. Also, this was the first border crossing to be opened by the East German authorities on that supposedly so historic evening of November 9, 1989. The irony is that “Böse”, understood as an adjective, means “evil”! The further symbolism of it was that German Chancellor Angela Merkel, herself a “former” East-German Marxist-Leninist, could be seen marching in the most cheerful Mayday mood, flanked by her fellow East-German communists, chanconnier Wolf Biermann and later-to-be German State President Joachim Gauck (for whom to get elected for that post it was necessary to chase out resp. character-assassinate two predecessors in that office of formal head of state). Interestingly, also fake Polish trade union leader Lech Wałęsa and fake Russian reformer Mikhail Gorbachev took part in that solemn reenacted communist invasion, so to speak. The message was quite clear: “We won, and soon the whole world is going to be ours!”
Were Angela Merkel and Lech Wałęsa genuine anti-communists – and we can assume that either way they are well aware of the real nature of the “changes” in the communist bloc of 1989/91 and ever since – they would certainly never ever pose together with the Soviet chief ideologue and spearhead of the world revolution, Mikhail Gorbachev! But instead, what we see in this scene is the most fraternal, almost conspiratorial calm imaginable. They have been, and still are, involved in one and the same project: pushing forward the cause of world communism to the point of global dominion. Wałęsa was merely being set up by the Polish communist structures as a “charismatic” union leader; whilst Merkel – just like Obama in the United States – is the perfect communist Trojan horse placed right within the enemy’s camp! Leaves us with very little hope regarding the survival of the free world, except for the possibility of Divine intervention …
What we have in front of us here is an all-leftist congregation celebrating the success of their longterm communist strategy; staffed, beside Gorbachev and Merkel, with people from present Germany’s far-left party “Die Linke” (i.e. “The Left”), that is an almost one-to-one continuation of the old communist GDR’s “Socialist Unity Party of Germany” (SED). Mind also the strangely altered German flag – one is immediately reminded of the flag of the old GDR, and rightly so – showing that infamous 1959 “socialist-pacifist” monument by Soviet sculptor Jevgeny Vuchetich that is placed next to the UN-headquarters in New York, accompanied by the deceptive socialist battle-cry stolen from the Holy Bible, “Schwerter zu Pflugscharen!”, i.e. “Swords to Ploughshares!” Wait for this: This was the exact symbol of communist East Germany’s “semi-official” peace movement that was started around 1980! Regarding Angela Merkel, her CV prior to the “collapse” of communism of 1989 has been widely deleted. However, what is known for sure is that her streamlined version of a childhood in a conservative and pious family in the midst of a hostile communist environment is a lie (her father, Horst Kasner, a Lutheran pastor, had deliberately moved from Hamburg, West Germany, to the “workers’ paradise” in the East just before Angela Merkel’s birth in July 1954, precisely because of a great sympathy of his for socialism, and quickly climbed the ladder in the GDR’s state-controlled church structures, soon to be notorious as the “Red Kasner”). In other words, young Angela grew up right in the middle of the party- and state elite. She was a determined young communist, excelled in the (mandatory) studying of the Russian language, and was later – beside studying Physics resp. beside working as a graduated Physicist at the Academy of Sciences – a secretary for agitation and propaganda in the communist youth organisation, “Freie Deutsche Jugend” (i.e., “Free Youth of Germany”). So, whatever the West Germans have embraced her as their “Mutti” (Mummy), she is definitely not working in the interest of what once was West Germany, but in the interest of world communism (and given Germany’s leading role in the European Union, this tells us all about the EU’s strategic orientation, that is solely directed towards Moscow; former President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, by the way, was “once” in his student years a Maoist student leader). What has been recognised, though, is Merkel’s completely secretive and strangely stoic style, by which nothing ever “sticks”: thus, she was nicknamed “Teflon Chancellor”. Of course there’s much to hide on her part as the only thing she visibly has at her heart is the communist agenda. The West Germans (as well as all the other West Europeans) must not discover this “little secret” before it’s all said and done.
The culmination of those 20-year-celebrations, already at night, too turned out to be a more than ominous spectacle. There were arranged, along the course where once that dreadful Berlin Wall had divided the city, a thousand dominoes made of polysterene foam and painted on by school children as well as signed by such Marxist celebrities as Nelson Mandela, for one example, and those dominoes, set up vertical in standstill, were to be kicked over and fall in a closed circle all around (which, because of the heavy rain, did not happen: the dominoes stopped halfway). The symbolism here, at least for those aware of the history of the Cold War, is obvious: It was a blatant and triumphant allusion to President Eisenhower’s so-called domino theory, mainly applied to Southeast Asia, that saw the communist expansionist policy as a continuous falling, one after another, of dominoes, meaning of yet-non-communist countries under the communist yoke, which was to be forestalled by the counter-strategy, if one can call it that, of “Containment”! Now, to have that symbolism depicting the danger of communist expansion used in a celebration allegedly commemorating the “fall of communism”, is more than cynical and shows who is at work not just in the choreography of such events but in the overall geopolitics of Europe!
November 8, 2010, off the coast of Los Angeles: A mysterious missile launch some 35 miles off the Southern Californian coast resulted in widespread uncertainty and confusion. All DoD entities positively confirmed there had been no missile test. At the same time, the Pentagon ruled out that it could have been a missile launch by a foreign power, coming up with the ridiculous explanation it must have been an airliner or a “toy rocket”. Yet, former U.S. Ambassador to NATO as well as former Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Ellsworth identified the projectile as “a big missile.” Also, retired U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Tom McInerney’s assessment was, “Look, this is not an airplane because of the plume, and the way you see that plume. Airplanes do not con at sea level or 5,000 feet like that. I spent 35 years flying fighters, and I never saw an airplane con like that. That is a missile, it’s launched from a submarine, and you can see it go through a correction course, and then it gets on a very smooth trajectory, meaning that the guidance system is now kicked in, it’s going at about 45° away from you, that’s why you are not seeing a lot of vertical velocity.” Could it have been a Chinese or (Soviet)-Russian missile fired from one of their super-quiet submarines?
Four years earlier, on October 26, 2006, occurred an incident of similiarly catastrophic implications: During a U.S. Navy exercise in the East China Sea, between Japan and Taiwan, suddenly and surprisedly a Chinese Song-class attack submarine surfaced within nine miles, i.e. within torpedoing distance, of the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk. None of the whole number of escorting ships of the compound (that must have included also submarines) had been aware of the presence of the Chinese submarine prior to its surfacing! The incident naturally caused great shock (not to speak of embarrassment) in American military circles as it revealed a degree of sophistication of China’s submarine fleet that had neither been known nor expected. The consequences from this new reality are far-reaching: the Navies of the West might now well be rendered useless and defenceless against Chinese (and certainly Russian) submarine approaches and attacks. Asked by American diplomats why the submarine had been shadowing the U.S. fleet, Beijing pretended ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidental.
On February 27, 2012, at the “birthplace” of the first Soviet atomic bomb, Sarov, the (Soviet-)Russian state and military elite held “roundtable” defense talks (which underlines that nuclear war for the Soviet strategists is not a theoretical option, but the very backbone of their WWIII military planning). Vladimir Putin, holding the office of Prime Minister at the time, made i.a. the following eye-opening remarks that show that the communist bloc has indeed successfully swung the balance of military power in its favour (to be checked out in a brief live recording on YouTube, starting at 0:34): “We have more aces up our sleeve that would push our Western colleagues and partners to a more constructive dialogue than we have seen before. What do I mean by this? Just a few years ago, as I know, they used to speak of us among their fellow allies as follows: ‘Russia could tinker with its military as much as it wants, we are not the least interested in what’s happening there. All they have is rusted-out junk.’ But this is not true. [Laughs] Today, it’s a different game.” In other words, the West, having naïvely fallen during the last 30 years for the calculated disinformation projected by “Russia” regarding an allegedly run-down Russian military, is now being laughed at for its stupidity. Still-communist Russia and communist China, along with their numerous allies around the world, now represent a combined military power so great and formidable that it can easily face down and defeat the West. Also, note the insidious expression that these aces Russia’s got up its sleeve (read: achieved military superiority) will push the West to a “more constructive dialogue” than before: in plain English, this foreshadows a scenario of military blackmail that will force the so-far-non-communist world to accept global communist tyranny!
May 9th, 2012, Moscow, Red Square: Since 2005, a supposedly “post-Soviet” Russia has again gradually reintroduced its highly ideologically charged annual Victory Day Parades on May 9th, “commemorating” the USSR’s victory over Nazi Germany in what is still being termed today in Stalinist fashion “the Great Patriotic War”, but of course at the same time anticipating total victory for world communism around the globe!
These pompous Victory Day military parades and commemorations, however, aren’t just held in what is now the “Russian Federation” as of course all “former” Soviet republics still share this same, unchanged Soviet-communist bloodstream. Here you can see an event on May 9, 2006 in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Note the demonic atmosphere that’s over the scene; it’s the very demonism that has been characteristic of the whole Leninist state right since 1917 (Romanian pastor Richard Wurmbrand, for many years imprisoned and tortured by the Romanian communist regime, indeed equalled communism to “collective demonic possession”; that’s what it is; that’s what’s to be expected in the so-far-non-communist world).
Also, “democratic Russia” has again adopted (resp. never let go of, in the first place) the Red Star as the emblem for its armed forces. However, also here one can find a little trick applied, namely this present Red Star shows a fine blue-white margin, citing the colours of the new Russian Tricolour. As a consequence, this “new” Red Star looks slightly less frightening than the old one!
Furthermore, the official military salute in both Russia’s armed forces and the militia is still – believe it or not – the same old communist way of address, namely e.g. “Tovarishch General!”, thus “Comrade General!”. Any explanation for that? -–In this picture, by the way, one can see present Russian Defence Minister, Sergey Shoygu. After five years of a civilian being in charge from 2007 till 2012, now again a General of the Army is heading the Ministry. He might well be the one to lead the unchanged Soviet Union, along with communist China and the rest of the communist bloc, into an all-out World War against the West.
As one examines the medals on General Shoygu’s uniform in the picture above, one can see on top of them all a quite peculiar award in the shape of a five-pointed star, as in Soviet times, that is supposed to be the order “Hero of the Russian Federation”. However, that very same medal, just with a plain red ribbon, once was the order “Hero of the Soviet Union”! It’s almost childish how they “changed” things solely on the surface. The reality, the substance underneath, however, hasn’t changed at all!
Ironically, in this photograph one can see the first Defence Minister of the “new Russia”, Pavel Grachev (in office from May 1992 till June 1996) as late as 1994, meaning three years into the alleged post-Soviet era, still with the old-style medal, “Hero of the Soviet Union”, although there’s at the same time the new Russian tricolour flag on his arm. Just think about it for a minute: No lesser a man than the Minister of Defence publicly wearing this allegedly outdated prominent Soviet medal more than two years after the alleged collapse of Soviet communism! This detail alone shows with staggering clarity that the “change” was only cosmetic and only for Western consumption …
At the 2010 Victory Day Parade on Red Square, the still-Soviet propagandists achieved a tremendous coup reminiscent of the one by Hitler and Genossen at the opening of the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin: This time, troops from the WWII Western allies, United States, Britain, and France were marching over Red Square, and they did so to Soviet military music. What symbolism!
But despite Western troops participating in this Soviet “commemoration” event, there hadn’t come one single political representative from either the U.S., Britain, or France: those Western troops were marching basically abandoned by their own heads of state. As a consequence, the only two Western guests (if one can call them that) were Germany’s (ex-GDR-)Chancellor Angela Merkel (which shows where Germany stands) and Israel’s State President at the time, socialist Shimon Peres. For “communists only”…
During the European Football Championship of 2012, jointly carried out by Poland and Ukraine, the game Poland vs. Russia on June 12, 2012, that took place in Warsaw’s National Stadium, was accompanied by this rather unfriendly gesture, if not to say: threat of war and terror, on the part of Russian “football fans”, not just against their still-communist-satellite Poland, but even more so against the West! What a straight-forward depiction of the true nature of the beast of Soviet communism! And what a truthful depiction also of who rules Russia: the Communist Party’s “Sword and Shield”, which is the KGB (now renamed to FSB and SVR, respectively). And let’s keep in mind: Only two years earlier, the whole so-called conservative Polish leadership around President Lech Kaczinsky died in a highly suspicious “plane crash”, ironically as they were about to visit the Katyn forest near Smolensk, Russia, where in the summer of 1940, with the eastern part of Poland occupied by Stalin, the Red Army had massacred some 22,000 Polish military officers. The diabolical cynicism of today’s Russia’s ruling oligarchy (that is still the old communist nomenklatura represented by younger faces) is just beyond belief! And around the playing field – what an irony in addition! – one can read those idiotic slogans of political correctness, “Respect” and “Say No to Racism”, that only serve to mentally and factually paralyse the populations of the West, but have no place in the communist world, where the “party line” has long since been firmly established anyway.
Two months after the inauguration of America’s first Stalinist President, head of the de-facto Comintern (a.k.a. the Gorbachev Foundation), Mikhail Gorbachev, pays a visit to the White House’s West Wing on March 20, 2009, cheering and laughing along with his fellow Marxist comrades Obama and Biden. This is where the United States of America has reached: a Soviet state of affairs.
Probably the most devastating humiliation and ridicule of the United States and what’s left of the Western world was the one by Comrade Gorbachev himself (who has by now completely dropped his former “friendly” mask) of December 10, 2011, when he gave in Munich, Germany, a bizarre “acceptance speech”, having received from the conservative Hanns Seidel Foundation their prestigious Franz Josef Strauß Award. The speech was that brutal (and chock-a-block full with the weirdest propaganda lies) that the mainstream media of Germany and elsewhere must have decided to not discuss its content at all. Only Bavarian Television aired the event once, late at night on that same day, and never again. In other words, the speech was more or less swept under the rug, with most of the world’s public never hearing about it. This author just incidently came across it via a YouTube piece that had part of the speech as a TV-recording, and then sat down and translated the Russian-to-German simultaneous interpretation into English. Months later he found a greatly streamlined print version of the whole speech on the website of the Hanns Seidel Foundation, the manuscript having been prepared by Gorbachev’s staff. This speech contains everything Soviet top defector Anatoliy Golitsyn had warned of: the communists, as soon as their longterm deception would have paid them sufficient dividends in terms of economic and military strength, would drop their nice and friendly mask of reform and cooperation and instead would adopt a very different attitude, namely that of open blackmail and threat against the West. And now, as the world is caught in the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression, the communists are eager to exploit this in order to finally achieve their long-desired world victory for communism. Also, this speech reveals with full clarity the “special” relationship between the unchanged Soviets and Germany. These two powers, one mainly military, the other mainly economic, work hand-in-glove for the moment, but finally are deadly rivals. Yet, the Germans obviously underestimate the argument of thermo-nuclear war that could any time turn them, along with their whole so-far-German-dominated European Union, into a complacent vassal of Sino-Soviet-led world communism. Here is the key passage, in fact about the full second half, from that dreadful Gorbachev-speech, that you can read in full in chapter 6 of this author’s treatise, “‘Forward, Comrades! Not Back!’ – America and the World on the Brink of Global Communism”:
[…] “But now I’m also slowly asking myself: what’s this all about? For, what we can see is that the missile defence is meant as a defence against Russia. Everything else is just talk, or a wall of fog to cover the truth. Yes, and as a result, the Russian government said: We’re going to station means of defence, here and there, and we are ready to use weapons that guarantee our security. What does this mean? WORLD WAR III! And if Russia and the USA should again be at loggerheads, this IS World War III! This won’t be restricted to a local war! And we need to again clearly remember the lesson, you know: the Cold War was over; our partners were triumphing, and they wouldn’t see the forest for the trees any more, in the West, and especially in the USA. They wanted to build a new empire, with a super-super-super-power – to which I say: the Germans are a serious and reflecting nation, and they know well what is being said in the USA; and when they don’t react to it and sometimes nod, it means all this can’t be taken for serious: It’s the attempt to threaten Russia a bit; and there is still in Europe a bit of fear left towards Russia. Yet, we only wish to build and develop: No one has led more wars in the 20th century than us. So much we had to suffer, and, just as a sidenote: We had no plans after WWII to start military action against the USA. I know it. I MUST know it. And, suddenly, all this starts all over again. This reminds me of those 200 or 300 US bases, spread all over the world, from the Cold War era; and have they been of any use to anybody? I have the impression that the evildoer of the system in which the West lives, and so with the consent of Washington, this radical market philosophy, all this hasn’t turned out positively. What have we got? Bubbles! One bubble after another, and they all burst. And, one should understand at last that the solution can’t be an arms race, the militarisation of the world and the economy, because we’d keep on throwing money out the window. And former Finance Minister Waigel spoke of 10 billion DM or Dollar, of course it was Mark, Deutschmark, that he didn’t give to Gorbachev at that time. How much money are we simply throwing out the window! Eisenhower is again quoted these days, General and President Eisenhower. Yesterday I had again the idea to watch that movie: “FFF” — No — “JFK”. On the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. I like such films, and one should watch them from time to time just so as to remain awake; if possible: wide-awake! And, Eisenhower, to come back to that, said that the military-industrial complex is a dangerous thing; and one should never lose control over it! He said that in a way as had never been said before. And I want to say: the man was right! [Applause] The military-industrial complex in our grand countries, that’s those who set the tone, who exert pressure on politics. I know how our military-industrial complex is doing this, and it is still very critical of Gorbachev because of perestroika and the freeing of the country from these military expenditures. But, these people have been accustomed to always “play the first fiddle”, and I think that if an economy cannot provide for its people, it is an ill economy; AND SUCH AN ECONOMY MUST BE CURED, AND SO BY RADICAL MEANS! This was my idea, this was my approach. And I’m still repeating it today. But, no, what are they telling people? They are telling them things that make them afraid. Well, and now they’re arming up. But when one looks at the situation thoroughly, one can easily see that our government is acting correctly and appropriately, because – I just say: the devil take it – there is no system for executing global decisions in a world that is already global. We simply still lack such mechanisms, and I have heard with great interest that, as has been said by your Prime Minister, “we are ready to help, but not to throw money into a bottomless pit.” After all, IT WAS THE GERMANS who initiated the Euro, the European single currency, and therefore Germany carries also great responsibility, and Germany is big and strong, and thus carries an especially great responsibility, from which it cannot just steal away. But, this is also about the processes within the countries. Many have entered the EU in an expectation of having things for free, I think you know exactly what I mean. Yes, so quickly did they rush to the West and left the Warsaw Pact and COMECON, all up and away towards the West, and the West immediately welcomed them and quickly incorporated these new countries, which all entered suit the United Nations; and you yourselves have greatly furthered this development. Thus, look who is talking! And, shouldn’t one be grateful to the Greeks for having established the fundaments of our civilisation? [Laughter and applause] But, well, I believe we know exactly what we need to think of each other, and we must build a system for executing global decisions in a global world. And for this, NEW systems, NEW models are needed! Betting on super-profits, super-consumption, and the like, leads nowhere. That’s of no use! Now, we have a billionaire who owns a submarine. And now he wants to commission a second one. Is this going to give the man happiness? No! One should find a small submarine, torpedo his first one so as to prevent the second one from being built; because no one needs this. Who needs this? And I ask you, my dear Germans: stand you also by your responsibility! You have initiated the Euro zone, and as soon as the control mechanisms become effective [i.e., as soon as all remaining national sovereignty of the individual member state is fully done away with, as is happening right now], this system will be precisely what Europe and the world need! [Applause] I think we should all really think about, together, how we can prevent a violent solution of the problems at hand, because when someone chooses force, this is the most dangerous thing that there is; and I repeat: we’re again in an arms race! It’s obviously about re-militarisation, not only militarisation of the economy, but also of consciousness. WE ARE ILL. WE ALL NEED TO BE TREATED AND CURED! And Generals again become heroes. Generals who believe they had disarmed too much, one missile of many thousands, that’s too much. And here I ask myself: How do the Generals think? If one bets on solving problems militarily, then one commits a mistake, and I’d like to say this again, I’ve heard this, we just had in France an annual meeting, the annual Conference of the World Political Forum, that I brought into being several years ago, really a serious organisation; there it was said: To bet on force and strength isn’t efficient. The nations, and most politicians, condemn such an attitude. And at the end we came to the conclusion that wars do not solve problems, and in earlier days thinkers said that war is necessary, that war brings about a movement ahead etc. No! War means a giant failure of politics. For what should one take up arms, aeroplanes, extremely destructive weapons? And why? Because the politicians got it wrong, because the politicians still lag behind the fast changes in the world. And, so to speak, the Russians, the Germans, the French, the Americans, the Japanese, and now also the Chinese, by the way, these nations are responsible for providing for the world a peaceful, positive perspective. And, also, it’s definitely wrong to believe one could hide away, one could sit out anything. No one can hide any more or sit anything out! Also small countries need contacts. I believe I have now strayed quite far from the Franz-Josef-Strauß Award [cynical laughter], but I’m convinced that the one is closely connected to the other; connected to the legacy passed on to us by smart brains. I’d like to once again express my heartfelt thanks. You know, I speak at home, here in Germany, in Europe, in the world. I advocate cooperation and of course a deepening in the cooperation between Russia and Germany. Because, this means very, very much for the overall situation. It stabilises it, develops it towards a positive outcome, and the people who are demonstrating in Wall Street demand social justice and equality. And, as you can see, also in the EU, mistakes were made. But this isn’t yet the essential point I want to make. I have the impression that – of course we aren’t out of the old crisis yet, and there are already signs on the horizon for a new crisis, but – as LENIN calmed his comrades-in-arms, this was when the Soviet power came into being, when there was a chaotic situation in the country: “Yes, of course we have chaos, BUT FROM CHAOS SPRING UP NEW FORMS OF LIFE“. And therefore, chaos IS a problem, a crisis IS a problem, all this isn’t easy, but there are always included opportunities that definitely should be made use of. And I wish the Germans a healthy New Year. And this time you will still have enough bratwursts and pork-knuckles for New Year’s Eve [laughter; yet, one can be sure not one single German was laughing]. WELL, AND AS FOR THE NEXT NEW YEAR’S EVE, WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT THAT, TOGETHER! And, I tell you quite frankly: it is for me a special, an emotional day. And regarding the accomplishments that I myself associate with my life – the German question, the destiny of Germany – these were for me of determining importance. And I’m proud of what I could do. Thank you very much! I’m wishing you good success!”
Remember the summer of 1989, when East German “refugees” had gathered at the Hungarian-Austrian border, eager to be allowed into freedom? Well, some 20 years later, supposedly post-communist Hungary erected on that spot an aggressive socialist-realist propaganda monument entitled “Umbruch”, i.e. approx. “radical change”. What a bold illustration of what really happened: it was the beginning of a brutal overall communist invasion, by “peaceful” means; and the West – completely ignorant about the communist bloc’s well-hidden intentions – was cheering like crazy. Funny enough, that monument is also entitled by the Hungarian word “Áttörés”, which doesn’t correspond with the meaning of “Umbruch” at all, as it means BREAKTHROUGH (as in, e.g., military breakthrough), rather than change…
Meanwhile this socialist-realist style has even established itself in the United States, and so most prominently next to the National Mall in Washington D.C.: In August of 2011, a monstrous 30-foot-monument was erected, that was sculpted by an artist from communist Red China and depicting “civil rights leader”, but de facto communist, Martin Luther King Jr. The America under Barack Obama already marked a transition phase towards full blown communism itself, rendering the entire rest of the world an easy prey to communist takeover!l
And, talking about insidious monuments communicating insidious messages: Here is the gravestone of Nikita Khrushchev, under whose auspices the long range deception strategy towards global communist triumph was formulated. Khrushchev “fell” in 1964, was living ever after under “house arrest” and died in 1971, being denied a state funeral. This tombstone was then placed on his grave in 1974. What a symbol for their deadly, black & white, dialectical method of lies and deceit! Also, September 11, 2001, happened to be not only Felix Dzerzhinsky’s 124th birthday, but also Khrushchev’s 30th death day.
Source: https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/tag/fake-collapse-of-communism/
Continued on next page…
