A controversial palliative care drug used to end life in the elderly in the UK and as the standard protocol in hospitals for treating Covid by sedation with excessive (lethal) doses of midazolam prior to ventilation. It causes respiratory depression and respiratory arrest. Few survived these 2 killer allopathic “treatments”. It was stockpiled in the UK (more than 2 years worth) in the spring of 2020 and protocols were disregarded to administer 10 to 20X the usual dosage allegedly to increase the amount of “Covid” deaths (thus greater panic, and fear).
It has been used in executions by lethal injection in certain states, combined with other drugs. It acts as a sedative to make the prisoner unconscious while other drugs then stop the lungs and heart working. It has been the source of some controversy as several prisoners have taken some time to die and appeared to be in pain when midazolam was used. Death penalty critics have argued midazolam is a sedative – not an anesthetic – and the condemned would feel pain from the drugs that come next.
It is also sold (almost exclusively to hospitals) under the brand name Versed, among others, is a benzodiazepine medication used for anesthesia, procedural sedation, trouble sleeping, and severe agitation. Midazolam can slow or stop your breathing, especially if you have recently used an opioid medication or alcohol, and is used only in hospitals, dentist offices, or other clinic settings because of the serious side effects.
The People’s Union of Britain [PUB] has filed or plans to file a Private Criminal Prosecution of the Four Horsemen of COVID-1984 and their accomplices for the Midazolam Murders. A December 2021 update was provided by TheBernician.net:
Summary of the Midazolam Murders Case
In PUB v Hancock et al, the prosecution will allege that, between 01/04/2020 and the present day, the defendants did willfully conspire, in a joint enterprise, whether with primary or secondary liability, to commit the murders by government policy of more than 136,000 people in UK care homes, by injecting the over 65’s with the infamous lethal injection drug, Midazolam.
Furthermore, we can also emphatically demonstrate that it is extant government policy to maximize the number of people placed on the end-of-life-pathway via predictive prescribing of Midazolam, to any patient of any demographic, whom a man or woman in a white coat deems likely to catch COVID-19 and die.
Moreover, documentary evidence shows that the UK Government and its institutions have been acting as if euthanasia is perfectly legal since 2008, when in fact it is murder to end anybody’s life prematurely in this country, even with the express consent of the departed and/or their loved ones.
Therefore, to argue that the graph above is merely an illustration of the administration of standard end-of-life care is synonymous with arguing that prematurely terminating life is both legal and well established practice within the NHS, when only the latter is correct.
Elements of Murder
As is required in all murder cases, we will argue that, upon the prima facie evidence adduced, it is beyond reasonable doubt that it was from the outset the intent of the defendants to murder the elderly in UK care homes, using COVID-19 as the smokescreen to account for the huge rise in the over 65 mortality rate, from April 2020 to the present day.
The motivation to do so was to provide each victim with “a good death”, for the purposes of saving money on keeping them alive for longer. Instead, they were arbitrarily placed on the end-of-life-pathway, which is an emotive phrase very often softened by the nefarious euphemism, Palliative Care.
For those who still need convincing that this is unequivocally the case, please watch Matt Hancock confess to the foregoing crimes in the video below, taken from the House of Commons April 2020 inquiry into COVID-19.
Confession Trumps All Other Evidence
In this truly damning video confession, upon being asked by Dr Luke Evans MP, whether Hancock had ordered enough Midazolam, Morphine and Syringe Drivers, as well as employed enough NHS operatives to administer “good deaths” to everybody on the end-of-life-pathway, the then Secretary of State for the DHSC confirmed that enough murder weapons and ammunition had been procured and distributed to the mobile assassins in white coats.
Given that the documentary evidence we have proves that, Hancock, acting in accordance with 2020-21 NICE guidelines, procured and facilitated the prescription of enough Midazolam [irrespective of Morphine prescriptions] to kill in excess of 136,000 people in UK care homes by lethal injection, it has become blindingly obvious that Hancock was forced to resign to distance the government from the allegations we are making.
However, it is also a well established matter of criminal law that, even in the event that there are witness statements to the contrary, a voluntary confession under oath trumps all other evidence, as we saw in the Yorkshire Ripper trial, when the only evidence required to convict Peter Sutcliffe was his confession to some of the crimes he was accused of committing, despite forensic evidence which showed that at least one of the victims was raped and murdered by another perpetrator.
This ancient rule of law must therefore be applied to Hancock confessing under oath to supplying the murder weapons, ammunition and instructions, to the assassins his department hired to euthanize the very people they claimed to be protecting from COVID-19, which renders the government’s propagandized marketing slogan, “Don’t Kill Granny”, about as sick and twisted as democide gets.
A documentary series was created by the BBC about the historic number of executions that were scheduled in Arkansas of eight men in ten days. The reason for this was to use up the state’s supply of midazolam before it expired.
Former Pfizer VP Mike Yeadon summarized the use of it in the United Kingdom:
In the U.K. the early default was sedation with excessive doses of midazolam & ventilation. Very few people lived through that.
The U.K. Department of Health had purchased a two years supply of midazolam in spring 2020. The NHS had also stockpiled a years supply by hugely reducing prescriptions for it in 2018-19.
So during the Great Panic of spring 2020, they found it appropriate to burn through 3 years supply of midazolam.
Dodging protocols. they administered 10 times the usual dose. No wonder so many elderly men died.
Do you recall the debates in U.K. parliament about whether the NHS had enough syringe drivers? These were needed to administer the fatal & inappropriate medications.
So the PCR test was intrinsically unsuitable as a diagnostic and was used to over diagnose “Covid-19”. Whilst most subsequent deaths were either in people whose imminent death wasn’t a surprise (age + pre-existing chronic illnesses) or occurred directly as a result of hopelessly inadequate medical interventions & drug treatments.
Virtually none died SOLELY because of infection with this virus. Many were murdered or at least due to unthinking medics “only following orders”.2
A policy that has been in place prior to the alleged emergence of Covid-19 clearly states that midazolam can be used for sedation, however dosage should be reduced to 0.5mg in the elderly or unwell due to possible side effects which include cardiorespiratory depression, and extreme caution should be used in administering midazolam to patients suffering respiratory disease.
However a policy created for treating patients allegedly suffering anxiety due to Covid-19, which we’re told is a respiratory disease, clearly states to treat said patient with a starting dose of 2.5mg of Midazolam, or 1.25mg if the patient is “particularly frail”, but to bump this up to 5 – 10mg if the patient is “extremely distressed”. Even the starting dose for the particularly frail is 0.25mg higher than the maximum recommended to administer to the elderly or unwell in sedation guidelines.
Source:
