As reported by Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a group known as Corvelva discovered that the original MRC-5 aborted baby cell line from which vaccines are still made today is derived from the entire human genome of an aborted male baby with “abnormal” genes.
As it turns out, some 560 of these abnormal genes have been linked to cancer, suggesting that a person’s cancer risk increases every time he or she is injected with yet another vaccine that contains this tainted MRC-5 aborted baby cell line.
In case you’re unfamiliar with MRC-5, this cell line is still being used in vaccines like the MMRV, which is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), as well as in Twinrix (for Hepatitis A and B), Proquad (another MMRV vaccine), and Varivax (for varicella and chicken pox).
While it was already known that this MRC-5 cell line came from aborted fetal tissue, what was not known is that it came from a single male baby – and with some serious health problems, no less.
“The fetal human DNA represented in this vaccine is a complete individual genome, that is, the genomic DNA of all the chromosomes of an individual is present in the vaccine,” CHD explains about this new revelation.
As for the 560 cancer-causing genes in MRC-5, the Corvelva research team found that these also have many variations for which the consequences remain unknown, “not yet appearing in the literature, but which still affect genes involved in the induction of human cancer,” CHP reveals.
In other words, nobody knows how these genetic variations are affecting people because they’ve apparently never been studied – and yet, we’re all supposed to believe that all vaccines are 100 percent safe and effective?
MRC-5 isn’t the only aborted fetal cell line in vaccines that’s problematic, either. According to Corvelva’s inquiry, WI-38, another aborted fetal cell line, is similarly problematic. And both MRC-5 and WI-38, it turns out, have no upper limits when it comes to the amount of them that are allowed in vaccine material.
Since the time when MRC-5 and WI-38 first started being used in vaccines around the 1960s, testing protocols have changed. But the reference literature for their use hasn’t been updated for about 40 years, until now.
Using Next NGS methodology in its metagenomic analysis, Corvelva compiled the data that drug companies and the federal government should have already compiled years ago, especially before deciding to add increasingly more vaccines to the official schedule.
So what does this all mean in practical terms? It means that vaccines today contain potentially tumorigenic materials that could cause people who receive them to develop cancer. Not only that, but the safety guidelines that correspond with these vaccines are woefully outdated and entirely inadequate in light of this revelation.
“As CHD explains, the vaccines are deliberately formulated with cancer-causing genes which have been specifically modified to promote cancer tumors … Not only is this cancer-ridden genetic code inserted into all these vaccines given to children, but the dose of the cancer-infected DNA is dangerously high.”