Taking Back Our Stolen History
Two homosexual political strategists, Marshall Kirk and Erastus Pill, published a landmark article in Guide Magazine, titled, forthrightly, “The Overhauling of Straight America.”
Two homosexual political strategists, Marshall Kirk and Erastus Pill, published a landmark article in Guide Magazine, titled, forthrightly, “The Overhauling of Straight America.”

Two homosexual political strategists, Marshall Kirk and Erastus Pill, published a landmark article in Guide Magazine, titled, forthrightly, “The Overhauling of Straight America.”

Two homosexual political strategists, Marshall Kirk and Erastus Pill, published a landmark article in Guide Magazine, titled, forthrightly, “The Overhauling of Straight America.” A few select quotations that capture its cynical tone and goals in furtherance of the larger “gay” agenda follow:

The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights…. And when we say talk about homosexuality, we mean just that. In the early stages of any campaign to reach straight America, the masses should not be shocked and repelled by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself. Instead, the imagery of sex should be downplayed and gay rights should be reduced to an abstract social question as much as possible. First let the camel get his nose inside the tent–only later his unsightly derriere! …

… So far, gay Hollywood has provided our best covert weapon in the battle to desensitize the mainstream…

“… gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector. If gays are presented, instead, as a strong and prideful tribe promoting a rigidly nonconformist and deviant lifestyle, they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that justifies resistance and oppression. For that reason, we must forgo the temptation to strut our “gay pride” publicly when it conflicts with the Gay Victim image…

“… the mainstream should be told that gays are victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their sexual preference. The message must read: “As far as gays can tell, they were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black or bright or athletic …

“… Our campaign should not demand direct support for homosexual practices, should instead take anti-discrimination as its theme. …

“… the campaign should paint gays as superior pillars of society. Yes, yes, we know – this trick is so old it creaks…

“… At a later stage of the media campaign for gay rights-long after other gay ads have become commonplace-it will be time to get tough with remaining opponents. To be blunt, they must be vilified. …we intend to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types.”

A few years later its authors did expand it into a book: Marshall Kirk, Hunter Madsen: ‘After the Ball – How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 1990s.’ (Plume, 1990), ISBN: 0452264987.
“After the Ball” has been the blueprint for advancing the “gay” agenda since its publication.

In summary, the “gay” agenda is to eliminate the existing Judeo-Christian model of civilization, grounded in marriage-based procreative sexuality, to make way for an irrational and impossible cultural Marxist model which imagines family-less, unlimited “sexual freedom” (anarchy), while somehow preserving orderliness in every other aspect of human society. It reflects an insane and Satanic delusion that breeds chaos, and can only be stopped by unceasing reaffirmation of biblical values and the natural family by the rest of us.

From: http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/gay-agenda-what-gay-agenda/