One of the key international think-tanks and meeting places organized by of political and corporate apparatchiks for the management of global collectivism. Standing in their way are democratic principles, free enterprise, and nationalism. Under the leadership of professor Klaus Schwab, it has played an increasingly important role in coordinating the big corporations’ rule of the world over the last three decades. Its plan for the Great Reset, a plan for an audacious and immensely far-reaching corporate takeover of the world, is immensely sinister. Each year, a forum is held in Davos, one of the biggest ski resorts in Switzerland. Therefore, the whole WEF is often simply referred to as “Davos”. 3,000 business leaders (the core attendees), international political leaders, central bankers, think-tankers, economists, celebrities and journalists gather for up to five days to discuss global issues, across 500 sessions, providing a platform for dialogue and serving as a catalyst for action.
“Along with the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Conference, this (the World Economic Forum) is one of the key meetings of the year. No policy is made here; it is all talk, some of it banal and platitudinous. But the consensus established is the backdrop against which policy is made worldwide” – Will Hutton
Several invitees have been members of the Bilderberg group, especially members of the Bilderberg Steering Committee, and the participants to a large extent overlap with other establishment groups and networks. For many years, the importance of the WEF to a large extent went under the radar, especially by alternative media. Individuals pay up to $US50,000 for membership of this elite group, and up to half-a-million for premium corporate memberships.
In the summer of 1971, Klaus Schwab invited 444 executives from Western European firms to the first European Management Symposium held in the Davos Congress Centre under the patronage of the European Commission and European industrial associations, where Schwab sought to introduce European firms to American management practices.
Over the years it has grown to a large unwieldy event, with up to 20,000 people being involved. In addition to the public, well broadcast forum discussions, there are many private meetings of a much more select character.
Over the years, themes such as climate change and sustainability became central themes of discussions. However, the subjects were discussed from the elitist perspective of the richest people in the world, hinting at dystopian top-down plans for “change in consumption patterns”, population reduction, etc.
- This environmentalism might function as an idea capable of creating ideological cohesion for the top few thousand richest people in the world.
- Some observers suspect the Greta Thunberg media offensive was orchestrated by the WEF. At the very least Thunberg received red carpet treatment at the WEF summit, unusual for most other struggling activists.
The WEF was one of the organizers (along with Johns Hopkins U. and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) of the Event 201 dry run held in NY in October 2019 for the planned Covid-19 lockdowns, leading to suspicions the group was – at the very least – exploiting the situation to introduce The Great Reset.
Another buzzword frequently pushed by the WEF, is The Fourth Industrial Revolution. The phrase itself was first introduced by Klaus Schwab, in a 2015 article published by Foreign Affairs. On October 10, 2016, the WEF announced the opening of its new Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution in San Francisco. According to the WEF, the center will “serve as a platform for interaction, insight and impact on the scientific and technological changes that are changing the way we live, work and relate to one another”
“And if you lease, why shouldn’t you lease your refrigerator, or your washing machine, or our dishwasher. Why do you want to own it? I mean it’s not like the plastic and the metal is like, “You! I own it.” A broken dishwasher. I mean wow. No, why don’t you want to go into a business model where the company owns it? You know what happens when the company owns it? Actually, they can bring down the prices because they don’t have to buy new metal and new plastic.”In April 2020: “WEF Hopes to Restart Global Economy With Blockchain Technology” after the COVID-19/Lockdowns.
In April 2017, John Kerry said:
“And yes, it [the Great Reset] will happen…and I think it will happen with greater speed and with greater intensity than a lot of people might imagine”
Her intentions and concerns for the environment may be genuine, but like privatization before, it could be used to rob people of their remaining rights and create over time, in a period of multiple decades into the next century, the population for a new feudal system. Not officially connected, but the United Nations plan Agenda21 focuses to some extent on migration into cities, which is a ‘naturally’ occurring phenomenon anyway. By improving housing in urban areas, and/or gradually stopping municipal services outside specified development regions (cities and their suburbs) it can animate the inflow into these areas.
In Pope Francis third encyclical: “Fratelli tutti” (All Brothers), he made two points regarding private property that can be seen in a similar way as the article by Ida Auken:
119. In the first Christian centuries, a number of thinkers developed a universal vision in their reflections on the common destination of created goods. This led them to realize that if one person lacks what is necessary to live with dignity, it is because another person is detaining it. Saint John Chrysostom summarizes it in this way: “Not to share our wealth with the poor is to rob them and take away their livelihood. The riches we possess are not our own, but theirs as well”. In the words of Saint Gregory the Great, “When we provide the needy with their basic needs, we are giving them what belongs to them, not to us”.
120. Once more, I would like to echo a statement of Saint John Paul II whose forcefulness has perhaps been insufficiently recognized: “God gave the earth to the whole human race for the sustenance of all its members, without excluding or favouring anyone”. For my part, I would observe that “the Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute or inviolable, and has stressed the social purpose of all forms of private property”. The principle of the common use of created goods is the “first principle of the whole ethical and social order”; it is a natural and inherent right that takes priority over others. All other rights having to do with the goods necessary for the integral fulfilment of persons, including that of private property or any other type of property, should – in the words of Saint Paul VI – “in no way hinder [this right], but should actively facilitate its implementation”. The right to private property can only be considered a secondary natural right, derived from the principle of the universal destination of created goods. This has concrete consequences that ought to be reflected in the workings of society. Yet it often happens that secondary rights displace primary and overriding rights, in practice making them irrelevant.
Chronological History of Events Related to the World Economic Forum
Klaus Schwab says Communist China is a “Role Model for Many Countries” in Creating the “New World of Tomorrow”
‘SMART CITIES’ Worldwide Being Converted Into ‘Open Concentration Camps,’ Says Ex-Silicon Valley Engineer Turned Whistleblower