Taking Back Our Stolen History
Wikileaks Begins Publishing Podesta Emails. Who Leaked Them? Russia or a Disgruntled Clinton Staffer?
Wikileaks Begins Publishing Podesta Emails. Who Leaked Them? Russia or a Disgruntled Clinton Staffer?
On 7 October 2016, WikiLeaks began publishing thousands of emails that it said were from Podesta’s Gmail account. The first batch of emails were released …

Wikileaks Begins Publishing Podesta Emails. Who Leaked Them? Russia or a Disgruntled Clinton Staffer?

On 7 October 2016, WikiLeaks began publishing thousands of emails that it said were from Podesta’s Gmail account. The first batch of emails were released less than one hour after The Washington Post published a controversial video of Donald Trump making lewd comments about women. Throughout October, WikiLeaks released installments of the Podesta emails on a daily basis. On 18 December 2016, John Podesta stated in Meet the Press that the FBI had contacted him about the leaked emails on 9 October 2016, but had not contacted him since.

MostDamagingWikileaks.com Covers the Top 100 wilileaks from the Podesta email hack on their website. A big thank you for your work! Here’s 25 of those below:

1. PIZZAGATE – Click on Link. This one deserved its own separate entry.

2. “Spirit Cooking” (Warning: satanic/extremely graphic)

3. Obama lied: he knew about Hillary’s secret server and wrote to her using a pseudonym, cover-up happened (intent to destroy evidence)

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/31077#efmAABABT
  • https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-03-of-04/view
  • https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/779729882146283521
  • “Jen you probably have more on this but it looks like POTUS just said he found out HRC was using her personal email when he saw it in the news… we need to clean this up – he has emails from her – they do not say state.gov”
  • “How is that not classified?” Huma Abedin to FBI when shown email between Clinton & Obama using his pseudonym. Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president’s use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email.”
  • I cannot state how huge this is, it’s a cover-up involving the President of the United States. There are a lot of emails implying this, but this email states it very clearly so anyone can understand.  The email proves obstruction of justice and shows how they lied to the FBI, and likely perjury of Congress. This at the very least proves intent by her Chief of Staff.
  • Obama used executive privilege in their correspondence. Cheryl Mills (who was given immunity) states they need to “clean up” the Clinton/Obama e-mails because they lacked state.gov.
  • Additionally, Obama on video publicly denied knowing about the server. He also claimed on video that he learned about the secret server through the news like everyone else. The corruption goes all the way to the top! Obama is lying to the American public.
  • Hillary Clinton set up her private server to hide her pay to play deals discovered throughout these leaks, and to prevent FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests.
  • Paul Combetta was hired to modify the email headers that referred to a VERY VERY VIP individual, i.e. change the name of who it was from. If you read Stonetear/Combetta story, it’s easy to see this is exactly what he was attempting. He wanted to change header information on already sent mail to show “state.gov” instead of Hillary’s private email address. Multiple people informed him of the infeasibility (and illegality) of it, so somewhere in the next 6 days, it was decided that simply eradicating them was the only option left.
  • The FBI said they could find no intent to break the law, therefore no recommendation of prosecution.  This email proves, in plain language, that there was intention, and knowingly broke the law.
  • Ask yourselves: Why would they both be communicating on a secret server to each other? Why not through normal proper channels? What were they hiding? We may soon find out.

4. Hillary Clinton dreams of completely “open borders”

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927#efmFhxFke
  • “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders”
  • This was stated at one of her $225,000 paid secret speeches to Wall Street that she has tried desperately to hide. This email contains those speeches in those attachments.
  • Border protection is important. Borders add safety and sovereignty to a country. Borders help prevent illegal immigration, which limits crime, drugs, human/sex trafficking across the border and allows more Americans (including African Americans and Latinos) to get jobs. It also costs the working class an exorbitant amount of money in higher taxes and leads to higher national debt. Mexico protects their southern border (with the help of $75 million from Obama).
  • During the 3rd debate, Hillary tried to pivot away from this damning topic by stating she only meant energy. Read the quote for yourself, energy is just one aspect of her open borders policy.

5. Hillary Clinton received money from and supported nations that she KNEW funded ISIS and terrorists

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5469
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1828
  • “…the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.”
  • “Clintons should know better than to raise money from folks whose primary concern has been supporting the NIAC, a notorious supporter of the Radical Islamic Mullahs. “The Clinton’s have thrown principle out the window in exchange for cold hard cash…putting money ahead of principle.”
  • Hillary’s Chief of Staff admits in the 2nd link that foreign interests sway Hillary to do what they want her to do (money for mandatory appearances).  She also admits that the “Friend of Hillary” list is available and rentable to people who want to influence, but that it’s too sensitive to talk in email.
  • This leak shows Hillary knows Saudis and Qatar are funding ISIS, which is an enemy of the state.  After knowing this, Hillary accepted tens of millions in donations from these terrorist-funding governments (of course they are getting something back in return). She also supported arms deals to them.
  • Saudi Arabia and Qatar commit horrible acts under Sharia law, including throwing gay people off of buildings, persecuting Christians, Jews, and atheists, and making it legal to rape and beat women. They are the leading funders of Hillary and her campaign through the Clinton Foundation.

6. Hillary has public positions on policy and her private ones

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927
  • “But If Everybody’s Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room Discussions And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To Say The Least. So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position.”
  • This leak is a big one because anything she tells us that she will do can and should be considered questionable. Whenever Hillary tells the public a position, a goal, or what she will do for America, there is no way we can be sure if she has an opposite, private position.
  • This was one of her private paid $225,000 speeches to Wall Street. Behind closed doors she is telling her Wall Street donors one thing, and the American people another thing.  Think about that for a moment…

7. Paying people to incite violence and unrest at Trump rallies

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3833
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/31335
  • “Engage immigrant rights organizations. DREAMers have been bird dogging Republican presidential candidates on DACA/DAPA, but they’ve learned to respond. There’s an opportunity to bird dog and record questions about Trump’s comments and connect it to the policy.”
  • “It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherf@#$er” (from video below)
  • “I mean honestly, it is not hard to get some of these ass holes to pop off, it’s a matter of showing up, to want to get into the rally, in a Planned Parenthood t-shirt. Or, Trump is a Nazi, you know? You can message to draw them out, and draw them to punch you.”
  • This video is the proof, please watch it!
  • “Bird-dogging” is a term coined by high level Clinton staffers who openly talk about it in the video.  They boast about inciting violence at Trump rallies, paying for every “protest”, manipulating Americans through the media to think that Trump is dangerous, and tricking people into thinking Trump supporters are violent and bad.
  • They laugh about paying off mentally ill and homeless people for years to incite violence against conservatives.  Truly despicable.  And they pretended to be Bernie supporters while they were “protesting”.
  • They admit to starting the Chicago riot where police were seriously hurt, and admit to shutting down the freeway in Arizona, partnering with Black Lives Matter. We even have proof that Hillary paid people to shut down the Chicago rally.
  • Inciting a riot is illegal under 18 US Code § 2102.
  • They also think 50% of people in Iowa and Wisconsin are racists, as they state in the video.
  • Robby Mook, Clinton Campaign Manager, mentions the Priorities SuperPAC in a leak, which is implicated in the video.
  • Bob Creamer (who was fired) claims in the video that the campaign knew about everything.  Bob Creamer visited the White House 340 times and personally met with Obama 45 times.

8. Hillary’s campaign wants “unaware” and “compliant” citizens

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3599
  • “And as I’ve mentioned, we’ve all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry. The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly. This problem demands some serious, serious thinking – and not just poll driven, demographically-inspired messaging.”
  • The Clinton campaign is literally conspiring to keep the population unaware of what is going on, and they admitted it in this email. Very scary ‘1984’ level thinking (group-think). If Hillary is the right choice for president and the truth is on her side, they should encourage their supporters to be aware and do research on both candidates.
  • Watch this video about it.

9. Top Hillary aides mock Catholics for their faith

  • https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4364
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/29867
  • [to be a Catholic is] “an amazing bastardization of the faith. They must be attracted to the systematic thought and severely backwards gender relations”
  • …no one knows what the hell they’re talking about.”
  • There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship
  • Top Clinton aides, John Halpin and Jennifer Palmieri mock Catholics for their faith. They complain about the large number of Catholics in prominent positions.
  • This was one of the few emails to actually make it to the mainstream media (FOX) and Palmieri when confronted about this revelation didn’t apologize.
  • Brian Burch, CatholicVote.org president released a statement proclaiming, “Hillary Clinton has already called half of her opponents’ supporters ‘a basket of deplorables’ and ‘irredeemable,’ and now it comes out that her campaign spokeswoman dismissively question[ed] the sincerity of Catholic Americans’ faith. Had Palmieri spoken this way about other groups, she [would be] dismissed. Palmieri must resign immediately or be fired.”
  • This revelation was brought up at the Al Smith dinner for Catholics.

10. Hillary deleted her incriminating emails. State covered it up. Asked about using White House executive privilege to hide from Congress.

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272#efmBI2BOJ
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9545
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/34370
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32007
  • “They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee.”
  • “That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn’t, which will make clear to them that she didn’t have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn’t turn them over. It also includes emails that HRC had that Sid didn’t.”
  • “Think we should hold emails to and from potus? That’s the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but I seems like they will.”
  • “We brought up the existence of emails in research this summer but were told that everything was taken care of.”
  • “That of course includes the emails Sid turned over that HRC didn’t, which will make clear to them that she didn’t have them in the first place, deleted them, or didn’t turn them over.”
  • The State Department was:
    • Coordinating with the Clinton political campaign.
    • Colluding with the press to spin it positively.
    • Doing so BEFORE they released it to AN EQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. The Clinton campaign was always a step ahead of the committee investigating them. Shameful.
  • Nick states “Just spoke to State” He goes on to reveal that State colluded with him about which emails are being revealed to committee and that the State plans to plant a story with AP.
  • Shows intent to withhold emails from the subpoena.

11. Bribery: King of Morocco gave Clinton Foundation $12 million for a meeting with Hillary, 6 months later Morocco gets weapons 

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/22030
  • https://i.sli.mg/JaZnPl.jpg
  • http://www.army-technology.com/news/newsus-approves-157m-tow-missile-system-sale-to-morocco-4736092
  • condition upon which the Moroccans agreed to host the meeting was her participation. If hrc was not part if it, meeting was a non-starter. CGI also wasn’t pushing for a meeting in Morocco and it wasn’t their first choice. This was HRC’s idea, our office approached the Moroccans and they 100 percent believe they are doing this at her request. The King has personally committed approx $12 million both for the endowment and to support the meeting.”
  • “She created this mess and she knows it… HRC said she’s still considering.”
  • This is AFTER her candidacy announcement!
  • Very important e-mail in that it demonstrates Hillary’s poor judgement (her idea) in the face of influence money and foreshadows how a Clinton Administration would be indebted to bad actors and criminal regimes.
  • The “same issues we discussed” mentioned by Robbie Mook in this email is a veiled reference to Morocco’s many human rights abuses.
  • Her campaign staff is rightly concerned about the optics of the Clinton Foundation/Clinton Global Initiative accepting huge sums of money from a regime that so frequently violates international law and acts in a way that you’d expect the Clinton Foundation to publicly rebuke.
  • It seems $12 million is just too much money to allow morals, ethics, and the best interests and values of American citizens to intervene.
  • The Intercept explores how Morocco is exploiting Hillary’s weakness for huge donations, and her desire to be President, to support their own geopolitical interests.

12. State Department tried to bribe FBI to un-classify Clinton emails (FBI docs)

  • https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view
  • http://nypost.com/2016/10/17/state-department-brokered-deal-with-fbi-to-declassify-clinton-emails/
  • “[Redacted] indicated he had been contacted by [Kennedy], Undersecretary of State, who had asked his assistance in altering the e-mail’s classification in exchange for a ‘quid pro quo,’”
  • “[REDACTED] believes STATE has an agenda which involves minimizing the classified nature of the CLINTON e-mails in order to protect STATE interests and those of CLINTON,”
  • [Redacted] advised that, in exchange for marking the email unclassified, STATE would reciprocate by allowing the FBI AGENTS to place more Agents in countries where they are presently forbidden.”
    1. Not only did the State Department, the undersecretary himself no less, make an attempt to bribe the FBI (to declassify several emails from Hillary Clinton’s private server)…
    2. They did it by trying to tempt the FBI into allowing them to act in sovereign nations where they are presently not allowed to operate.
  • This isn’t a smoking gun. This is a smoking cannon.
  • I’m not sure how this does not bring the State Department to a screeching halt.
  • This shows a cavalier attitude towards protecting our nation’s secrets.

13. Hillary caught on tape about rigging the Palestine election (audio)

  • https://soundcloud.com/user-30899546/hrc-determine-who-win-1
  • “I do not think we should have pushed for an election in the Palestinian territories. I think that was a big mistake.  And if we were going to push for an election, then we should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win.”
  • According to an article by The Observer, “On September 5, 2006, Eli Chomsky was an editor and staff writer for the Jewish Press, and Hillary Clinton was running for a shoo-in re-election as a U.S. senator. Her trip making the rounds of editorial boards brought her to Brooklyn to meet the editorial board of the Jewish Press.  The tape was never released and has only been heard by the small handful of Jewish Press staffers in the room. According to Chomsky, his old-school audiocassette is the only existent copy and no one has heard it since 2006, until today when he played it for the Observer.  The tape is 45 minutes and contains much that is no longer relevant.”
  • Chomsky recalls being taken aback that “anyone could support the idea – offered by a national political leader, no less – that the U.S. should be in the business of fixing foreign elections.”
  • This is 100% proof that she is willing to debauch an electoral process.  This also shows that she knows what it takes to rig an election.

14. Latinos are “needy”. Latino outreach is “taco bowl engagement”

15. Clinton campaign was in direct communication with DOJ regarding Hillary’s investigation

  • https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4178
  • “DOJ folks inform me…”
  • This report that Clinton’s campaign was in direct communication with the Obama Department of Justice on the email investigation shows a level of collusion which calls into question the entire investigation into her private server.
  • On June 29, head of the DOJ, Attorney General Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on a private plane for 30 minutes.  The meeting occurred hours before the House Select Committee on Benghazi released its final report to the public. Sneaking around during an investigation with the husband of the one being investigated is highly unethical and downright shady.
  • On October 28, Attorney General Lynch declined to comply with Congress regarding the secret Iran ransom payments. The top law enforcement official, The United Sates Attorney General, “declines to cooperate” with an investigation by Congress. Let that sink in.

16. Bill Clinton receives $1 million “birthday gift” from ISIS-funding Qatar while Hillary was SoS, Qatar receives arms flow increases of 1,482%

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396
  • http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187
  • “Would like to see WJC “for five minutes” in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC’s birthday in 2011.”
  • Just another examples of breaking the law. Also remember from earlier: Hillary KNEW that Qatar funds ISIS.  Why is the country funding ISIS giving money to Bill and paying for Hillary’s campaign. What are they getting in return?
  • In accordance with the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution, you may not accept anything of value from a foreign government, unless specifically authorized by Congress. This rule applies whether you are on or off duty. Any unit of a foreign government, whether it is national, state, local, or municipal level, is covered. It also applies to gifts from international or multinational organizations comprised of government representatives. It also may apply to gifts of honoraria, travel, or per diem from foreign universities, which are often considered as part of the foreign government. Spouses and dependent children of Federal employees are also banned from accepting gifts from foreign governments.

17. Hillary cheated in debates: DNC head Donna Brazile caught giving MULTIPLE debate questions to Hillary

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39807
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38478
  • “From time to time I get the questions in advance… Here’s one that worries me about HRC [death penalty].”
  • “I rarely hear it. I’ll send a few more. Though some questions Roland submitted”
  • “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash”
  • “Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint.”
  • Here is video proof of the question Donna Brazile sent.  In the video, you can SEE Hillary looking down at her script to answer the question.  Notice how Hillary has an extremely detailed response citing a dozen different things. Yet another scripted Hillary moment as you will see throughout these leaks.
  • The question about the death penalty was asked almost verbatim by CNN the next night.
  • These are two clear instances and proof of Donna Brazile giving debate questions to Hillary’s team.  She tried hard to defend herself the first time in a cringe-worthy interview with FOX’s Megyn Kelly. Donna dodged, pivoted, avoided the accusations and claimed she was “being persecuted” for being asked about leaking the question to Hillary so she could cheat. A day before the 2nd leak implicating Donna Brazile, she wrote on Twitter, “Please God, let this end soon”
  • Shortly after this revelation came out, Donna Brazile (awaiting her resignation) wrote this on Twitter: “Thank you @CNN. Honored to be a Democratic Strategist and commentator on the network. Godspeed to all my former colleagues.”
  • CNN wrote, “We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor.”
  • Remember, Donna Brazile worked for CNN and the first debate question was released through CNN.  The network that has been caught colluding with the Hillary campaign and in their own words, “doing everything [they] can to give [Hillary] a free ride” is implicated just as much as Donna Brazile and has no room to take the high road here.
  • Assuming she is fired from the DNC (based on news, it seems likely as she was already fired from CNN), this would be the second head of the DNC to be fired in less than a year due to extremely unethical collusion with Hillary’s campaign. The first (Debbie Wasserman-Schultz) was hired by Hillary herself after she was fired by the DNC. Maybe Donna Brazile will follow suit.

18. Hillary campaign hopeful for shooters in news stories to be white

19. Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (DNC favored Hillary)

  • https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11056
  • https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5477
  • https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/9999%20
  • https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7643
  • “Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story, which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess. Specifically, DWS [DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz] had to call Bernie directly in order to get the campaign to do things because they’d either ignored or forgotten to something critical.”
  • “[Bernie is] someone who has never been a member of the Democratic Party and has no understanding of what we do.”
  • “He isn’t going to be president.”
  • “[F]or KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.”
  • “If she outperforms this polling, the Bernie camp will go nuts and allege misconduct. They’ll probably complain regardless, actually.”
  • These emails were written by several leaders in the DNC. They are not supposed to take sides yet they clearly did months before any votes were cast. After the DNC leaks, their leader Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was fired, but immediately joined the Hillary Clinton campaign… think about that for a second. Remember… Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was placed at the top of the DNC once someone else stepped down, none other than Tim Kaine.  In a later leak, we learn that Tim Kaine was promised VP a year in advance, so the pieces were put in place to get Hillary nominated.
  • They even tried to attack his belief system. Hillary’s campaign has been helped and manufactured since the very beginning.
  • There were statistical anomalies in the primaries.  In states with only electronic voting machines, Hillary grossly out-performed exit polls, but when their were paper ballots/paper trail, exit polls matched the results.
  • Bernie Sanders activist and process server Shawn Lucas served the DNC Services Corp. and Chairperson Debbie Wasserman-Schultz at DNC’s headquarters in a fraud class action suit against the Democrat Party on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters. He was found dead a few weeks later on his bathroom floor.

20. Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (Hillary’s team)

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5423
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10669#efmAO0APKAPMATG
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5688
  • “Bernie and his people have been bitching about super delegates and the huge percentage that have come out for Hillary… We want [Bernie supporters] to go home happy and enthusiastic in working their asses off for Hillary. Why not throw Bernie a bone . . . his people will think they’ve “won” something from the Party Establishment. And it functionally doesn’t make any difference anyway. They win. We don’t lose. Everyone is happy.”
  • “I am doing the opposite, repeatedly writing friendly and positive pieces about Bernie as an HRC supporter, and when the time is right I will have money in the bank with him and his people as a liberal to urge them to come out in force to vote for HRC.”
  • “Frankly I thought it was dumb for McCaskill and Gutierrez to be attacking Bernie. We are going to need his voters to turn out in November for HRC, he won’t be nominated.”
  • “Through internal discussions, we concluded that it was in our interest to: 1) limit the number of debates (and the number in each state); 2) start the debates as late as possible; 3) keep debates out of the busy window between February 1 and February 27, 2016 (Iowa to South Carolina); 4) create a schedule that would allow the later debates to be cancelled if the race is for practical purposes over.”
  • The person who wrote the superdelegate rules advises the Clinton Campaign how to create an illusion that Bernie people won something so they would work hard for Hillary after she is nominated. More shocking is the fact that they admit that the superdelegates are undemocratic. This guy flat out admitted that he rigged the system, and is proud of it.
  • There was also a man who was acting as a mole for Bernie and writing positive/negative things about him then using that reputation to sway Bernie supporters to Hillary.
  • Lastly, we see how to rig the debate schedule to be more favorable to her. One on one debates would have been better for Bernie Sanders, so they wanted to avoid that at all costs. They also wanted to limit the number of debates, and start them late to minimize the impact of the debates.
  • Hillary is also on audio insulting Bernie supporters by calling them “basement dwellers“.

21. Hillary was hateful, neglectful, above the law, “contemptuous” to her security detail, and “blatantly disregarded” security, (FBI docs)

  • https://sli.mg/a/nNCo7y
  • https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-04-of-04/view (p. 43-45)
  • “CLINTON frequently and “blatantly” disregarded [security and diplomatic protocols].”
  • “This frequently resulted in complaints by ambassadors who were insulted and embarrassed by this breach of protocol… CLINTON’s protocol breaches were well known throughout Diplomatic Security and were “abundant.”
  • “…ABEDIN possessed “much more power” over CLINTON’s staff and schedule than other former chiefs of staff… was often responsible for overriding security and diplomatic protocols on behalf of CLINTON.”
  • “…Clinton disregarded security and diplomatic protocols, occasionally without regard for the safety of her staff and protection detail, in order to gain favorable press.”
  • “…traveling to Palestine, CLINTON ordered the limousine driver… to open the window while in “occupied territory”, referring to a dangerous area of the West Bank. [He] initially declined to respond to CLINTON’s request; however, repeated demands by CLINTON forced him to open his window despite the danger to himself and the occupants.”
  • “CLINTON’s treatment of DS agents on her protective detail was so contemptuous that many of them sought reassignment or employment elsewhere… it was difficult to find senior agents willing to work with her.”
  • Look at the first link (highlights all the parts). Seriously, there are way too many to include in the quotes… just a sheer and utter lack of care for protocol, security, and the well being of others.  This is the person who people want to be in charge of national security and classified documents.
  • Another scary note in this list is the mention of Huma Abedin, Hillary’s long time assistant, possessing “much more power” and overriding security and protocol on Hillary’s behalf. Abedin has been strongly rumored to be Hillary’s Chief of Staff should she be elected. She also has strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

22. Clinton Foundation schemed with Big Pharma: keep the price of AIDS drugs high in America and NO to cheaper generic versions

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/24440
  • “Since President Clinton’s comments were made, we have been contacted by a number of advocacy groups who are now intending to wage a public campaign to bring in generics and lower drug prices. We do not feel we can participate in this without jeopardizing our work around the world. We cannot oppose what they might do, but we also cannot be publicly supporting it either.”
  • “we think that publicly pressuring the US and European AIDS drug companies to lower prices and bringing pressure to allow generic AIDS drugs into the United States will have limited if any success and could seriously jeopardize our negotiations to continually lower prices in poor countries… We have always told the drug companies that we would not pressure them”
  • “We have always told the drug companies that we would not pressure them and create a slippery slope where prices they negotiate with us for poor countries would inevitably lead to similar prices in rich countries.”
  • “we suggest that we approach the innovator companies that can currently sell products in the US with the idea of making donations to help clear the ADAP lists.”
  • “the companies will likely favor a donation approach rather than one that erodes prices across the board. I would guess that they would also likely favor a solution that involved their drugs rather than an approach that allowed generic drugs from India to flood the US market at low prices or one that set a precedent of waiving patent laws on drugs.”
  • When the Clintons are questioned about the obvious sketchiness of their foundation, they routinely cite AIDS work. But the AIDS work is carried out by CHAI (“Clinton Health Access Initiative”), a separate organization.
  • CHAI freely admits there is an implicit agreement with the drug companies not to pressure them to lower domestic prices. Bill Clinton made comments that added pressure. CHAI receives a great amount of positive publicity for their AIDS work abroad, and the comments jeopardize that program. Here, CHAI admits it is in their interests for U.S. AIDS drug prices to remain high, so that they can continue getting credit for keeping them low abroad.
  • But CHAI is not content with simply fleecing American AIDS sufferers. Since CHAI doesn’t want pressure on Pharma companies to linger, they propose to torpedo other AIDS advocacy groups by creating a smaller, watered-down domestic program with the Pharma companies before those other advocacy groups begin their assault in January.
  • The Clintons are only out for themselves. In comments on World AIDS day in the subsequent years of 2012 and 2013, Bill says nothing whatsoever about domestic drug prices. If AIDS advocacy groups cannot trust the Clintons not to stab them in the back, how can the American people?
  • Also remember, the Clinton foundation only donates 5.6% of their earnings to charity, despite Hillary knowingly and blatantly lying to the American people by claiming they donated 90% at the last debate, but she is counting on you to not do research, and her mainstream media to not report it.

23. Democrats created fake Trump “grope under the meeting table” Craigslist employment ad in May 2016

  • https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803
  • “Like it or not, he may greet you with a kiss on the lips or grope you under the meeting table.”
  • “As long as all the offensive shit is verbatim I’m fine with it.”
  • Childish behavior from the people Hillary wants to help her run the country.  Also references groping, which they are trying so hard (with the media’s help) to push forward.
  • The reason this is damning is because it shows they were planning this way back in May, these “accusations” are not spontaneous.

24. Hillary’s camp excited about a black teen’s murder (to help her agenda)

  • https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25750
  • “This is great.”
  • “Davis was killed by a white man.”
  • Disgusting. I wish all Americans would see this, the democratic strategists drooling over the opportunity to drive a wedge of racial hatred between the races in America to maximize their political advantage.

25. Rigging media polls through oversampling

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26551
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//fileid/26551/7326
  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15442
  • “I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February.”
  • “so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling.”
  • [For Arizona] “Research, microtargeting & polling projects – Over-sample Hispanics… – Over-sample the Native American population”
  • [For Florida] “On Independents: Tampa and Orlando are better persuasion targets than north or south Florida (check your polls before concluding this). If there are budget questions or oversamples, make sure that Tampa and Orlando are included first.”
  • [For National] “General election benchmark, 800 sample, with potential over samples in key districts/regions – Benchmark polling in targeted races, with ethnic over samples as needed – Targeting tracking polls in key races, with ethnic over samples as needed”
  • “The plan includes a possible focus on women, might be something we want to do is over sample if we are worried about a certain group later in the summer.”
  • This is why you see the skewed polls show Clinton +12 when other more accurate ones show Trump +2. The high Clinton ones oversample democrats by a HUGE margin to get desired results (sometimes 20-40% more Democrats sampled).  Many are created by organizations that donate to Hillary, and some are even conducted by her own SuperPACs!
  • They do this to make Republican voters feel discouraged and not come out to vote if they think their candidate will lose.
  • Just look at this example in Arizona: Clinton +5, but Democrats were oversampled by 34% (58 out of 100 Democrats, 24 out of 100 Republicans)! Good lord.  Unfortunately the colluding media only reports on the final number, without reporting on the over-sampling.

26. How millions of dollars were raised for the Clintons. Blurred lines between personal and Foundation money

  • https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32240 (in attachments)
  • “Throughout the past 11 years since President Clinton left office, I have sought to leverage my activities, including my partner role at Teneo, to support and raise funds … to support the Clinton Foundation and President Clinton personally.”
  • “We also have solicited and obtained, as appropriate, in-kind services for the president and his family – for personal travel, hospitality, vacation and the like.”
  • “…more than $50 million in for-profit activity…”
  • “We appreciate the unorthodox nature of our roles”
  • “Need get this asap to them although I’m sure cvc won’t believe it to be true bc she doesn’t want to Even though the facts speak for themselves. John, I would appreciate your feedback and any suggestions”
  • “I’m also starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed.”
  • The 12 page document goes in detail over how Bill Clinton monetized the foundation. The basic context is that, at some point in 2011 there was a civil war inside the foundation, with Teneo/Doug Band on one side, and Chelsea Clinton on the other.  In this attachment, Band tries to justify himself by going over how much money he has made for the Clintons.  It also dispels and puts to rest the notion that the Clintons don’t make money from the Foundation. In fact, it demonstrates that the Clinton fortune and the Foundation are indistinguishable and essentially the same, and that donations to the Foundation come with kickbacks for all involved.
  • The Clinton Foundation even hired a law firm to find out if their pay-to-play scheme would jeopardize their charitable status with the IRS.
  • Doug Band (who was to Bill what Huma Abedin is to Hillary) described his work as running “Bill Clinton Inc.” Essentially, the memo describes Teneo as the revenue-generating arm of Clinton, Inc. – for Clinton speeches, foundation money, etc. It also details quite a bit of offshore money that came in.
  • Band was selling his clients on idea that giving to the Foundation was a way to bolster their influence.
  • The second link is more discussion on the infamous Doug Band memo about Teneo, which revealed corruption and inurement by the Clintons. They were using “charity” to personally enrich themselves to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. Doug is worried that if the “story gets out” Teneo, the company involved in the scheme will have to be shut down completely and that they “would be screwed.”

Read the full Top 100 Podesta Emails HERE (list excludes PIZZAGATE)

Who Leaked the Podesta Emails to Julian Assange at Wikileaks?

Hillary Clinton and the CIA immediately accused Russia for the leaked emails. Russia denied. Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, told The Daily Mail that Podesta’s emails were leaked to the organization by a disgruntled insider, not the Russians. Consequently, there are suspicions it may have been former Clinton Foundation CEO, Eric Braverman. (Though some of the Podesta emails are dated after Braverman’s tenure with the foundation, if he had Podesta’s password, he could still have accessed his email after leaving.)

(Continued on page 2…)

Pages: 1 2