A now retired, former woke political partisan chairman of the Joint Chiefs-of Staff. He was appointed Army chief of staff in 2015.[1] Milley is a proponent of scientific racism. Since becoming chairperson of the Joint Chiefs, Milley began implementing the socialist revolutionary long march through the institutions advocated by Antonio Gramsci and Rudi Dutschke. President Donald Trump said of Milley, “Milley went to Congress and actually defended Critical Race Theory being shoved down the throats of our soldiers. This Marxist, racist propaganda has no place in our Military—I banned these programs, now Biden and the Pentagon have resumed them. As soon as possible Congress must defund this racist indoctrination. General Milley ought to resign, and be replaced with someone who is actually willing to defend our Military from the Leftist Radicals who hate our Country and Flag.“[3]
By military standards, Milley is an obese old white man. The Intercept reported that Milley is “cashing in” on his retirement by going on a lucrative speaking tour, joining the faculty of Princeton and Georgetown universities and enjoying a well-compensated advisory position with JPMorgan Chase Bank – all a reward by the deep state for his help in destroying America.1
Leftist proclivities
Milley is notable for a rather obtuse statement in a Congressional hearing: “I want to understand white rage. And I’m white.”
Milley said in a House Armed Services Committee hearing he is “widely read” in communist literature and, most notably, “I personally find it offensive that we are accusing the United States military general officers are commissioned [and] noncommissioned officers of being ‘woke,’ or something else because we’re studying some theories that are out there. I’ve read Karl Marx, I’ve read Lenin, that doesn’t make me a communist. I want to understand white rage. And I’m white.” Author Lee Smith noted that Milley was not asking the right questions:
“Why are they mad we exported their jobs to China? Why are they mad we send their children to kill and die in strategically pointless foreign wars that advance only our interests? Why are they angry we denigrate their symbols and their monuments, their heroes, and their history? Why are they mad we destroyed their businesses and kept their children from going to school? Why are they mad we didn’t let them visit their loved ones in nursing homes and hospitals as they lay dying? Why are they mad we tell them they are racist, and their country will be remade in the image of those we encourage to cross our borders illegally, and the criminals we send to the streets to kill them? Why are they mad when we tell them that there is no place for them in the new country until they confess to the evil they have done?[3]
Helen Raleigh of The Federalist asks,
Here are some questions for Milley. How can American soldiers of different racial backgrounds fight side-by-side and entrust each other with their lives if their relationship is defined as oppressors and oppressed because of their skin color? How can you ask minority soldiers to defend this nation (and even make the ultimate sacrifice) if they have been told they are victims of this nation’s everlasting racism?[4]
Federalist Publisher Ben Domenech discussed Gen. Mark Milley and the increasingly politicized nature of the U.S. military:
General Milley’s record of achievements, such as they are, include episodes of profound blundering — a persistent misunderstanding of the national interest. And a dangerous willingness to politicize the army of the United States….Our armed forces remains a stronghold of brave patriots. But once you get that first star on, things change. Advancement becomes about subjective politics, not empirical outcomes. When your next job and your next promotion depend on a vote of the United States Senate, their priorities become your own, and you start to resemble a senator more and more, and a general less and less….This is a group of leaders who are masters at political climate, media engagement, and spending trillions in your taxpayer dollars….They even get the praise of one useful media idiot after another, whose natural inclination is to ‘yes queen’ anyone who agrees with their woke ideology no matter how obvious it is that they fail at any measure of success at their actual job.[6]
Milley, 63, is not a graduate of America’s military academies. Instead, he’s an Ivy League product, having attended Princeton and Columbia. Apparently, at least as to Milley, the rot had already started to set in when he attended those institutions.
It’s unclear why President Trump, in 2018, nominated Milley to serve as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It was probably yet another bad piece of advice that Trump, who was wise to how the real world works but utterly naïve about Washington, received from those “in the know” who were trying to destroy him. As it turned out, Milley was at the top of the list of those who despised Trump and all 75–80 million of his supporters, and desperately wanted to see them destroyed.
We know this thanks to a new book, not from The Daily Wire or Breitbart, but from a sympathetic outlet: two Washington Post reporters, Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker. What you’re about to read, which comes from the leftist, anti-American, anti-Trump AFP, is meant to be complimentary about Milley:
The Pentagon’s top general feared late last year that then-president Donald Trump would suspend the constitution to retain power in a move resembling Adolf Hitler’s 1933 Reichstag takeover, according to a new book.
Joint Chiefs Chairman Mark Milley saw Trump’s refusal to accept defeat to Joe Biden in the November election as a possible sign that he intended to retain power by any means, according to excerpts from the book by Washington Post reporters Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker that were reported by the Post and CNN Thursday.
“This is a Reichstag moment… The gospel of the Fuhrer,” Milley told Pentagon aides, the authors report.
In 1933 Hitler took advantage of a suspicious fire at the Reichstag, the German parliament, to suspend civil liberties and concentrate authority in his government, setting the stage for the Nazi consolidation of power.
When Trump called for a march on Washington by supporters in November, Milley, who had been appointed by Trump, expressed worries that he was deploying “brownshirts in the streets,” the book says, referring to Hitler’s violent followers.
The same article reflects Milley’s horror that Trump was claiming election fraud (AFP says “with no evidence,” although we have plenty of evidence) and Milley’s plan to counter Trump’s alleged coup with a coup of his own.
“They may try, but they’re not going to f—— succeed,” Milley told his aides, the book recounts.
“You can’t do this without the military. You can’t do this without the CIA and the FBI. We’re the guys with the guns,” he said.
Again, the AFP thinks this is a good thing. For those of us who believe in the constitutional chain of command, which makes Milley subordinate to the president, it’s horrifying to read about his megalomaniacal view of his power and his deep hatred for half of America — the half, moreover, that has always supported the military and that was the backbone of American values until around 2012.
Tucker Carlson sums it up well:
As it stands, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was content to characterize his commander-in-chief as Hitlerian and almost half the nation he ostensibly served as “brownshirts” — and he refuses to deny the accuracy of that account. Though he fancies himself an educated man, he would have benefited from a quick historical assessment of that comparison, as outlined by National Review’s Kyle Smith: “Trump vs. Hitler: Let’s Run the Numbers.”
Recall that last summer, when Milley appeared in a photo with Trump in Lafayette Square ahead of the Secret Service ordering protesters out of that area, Milley apologized for having created a “perception of the military involved in domestic politics.” He has now surged far across that line.
On 20 January, after Biden was sworn in, the Obamas, who were seated just in front of Milley, asked how he was feeling. He responded: “No one has a bigger smile today than I do.” What a piece of $#@7!
Traitor
According to a 2021 book “Peril” written by Bob Woodward, Milley told China in a secret phone call that he would give advance warning if the US was ever going to attack:
“In a pair of secret phone calls, Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, assured his Chinese counterpart, Gen. Li Zuocheng of the PLA, that the U.S. would not strike, according to the new book written by Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward and national political editor Robert Costa.
One call took place on Oct 30, 2020, four days before the election that unseated President Trump, and the other on Jan. 8, 2021, two days after the Capitol siege carried out by his supporters in a quest to cancel the vote.
The first call was prompted by Milley’s review of intelligence suggesting the Chinese believed the United States was preparing to attack.
“General Li, I want to assure you that the American government is stable and everything is going to be okay,” Milley told him. “We are not going to attack or conduct any kinetic operations against you.”
In the book’s account, Milley went so far as to pledge he would alert his counterpart in the event of a US attack, stressing the rapport they’d established through a backchannel. “General Li, you and I have known each other for now five years. If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.”
These were acts of treasonThese were acts of treason. Milley was not the President nor did he obtain permission from the President. One of the calls with China was relayed to Speaker Nancy Pelosi which likely makes her an accomplice in a treasonous act. Pelosi is not President either. Yet, Milley had the audacity to bad mouth the President and call him names. He colluded with China because he is an enemy of Trump and the American conservatives who tries to force out of the military.
Sources:
