And now I will explain in detail why the problems before the explosions had to be sabotage.
The diesel generators were not out in the open as we were led to believe, they were in fact located in the basements of the turbine buildings which were sealed off and never significantly flooded. One of them stayed running the entire time, but the electrical switch gear attached to it disconnected it for an unexplained reason which made it useless. Each of the backup generators at Fukushima were capable of running 14,000 households each, which means they had to be over ten megawatts each. It is obvious then that Fukushima was set up to survive on only ONE of 13 backup generators, and ONE did keep running. One would be many times larger than needed to run last ditch backup systems at all reactors, but would not keep business as usual. But that is not the real story, which is that even others which were high and dry stopped as well.
I hypothesize that the ONE generator that kept running was kept as a lone reserve, never hooked up to a SCADA controller. Why did the switch gear disconnect a working generator? That is the type of thing Stuxnet was designed to do. On top of these things, emergency generators arrived on scene within 9 hours, before anything bad happened at all but were not able to provide power because the switch gear would not let them.
The World Nuclear Association did a beautiful report about what happened out at Fukushima, and then got co-opted by dark forces. I am keeping the key content of their original report preserved in this one. The World Nuclear Association got taken over, their report destroyed and also expunged from the wayback machine. This Fukushima report you are reading now is all that remains as a solid reference to the original World Nuclear Association report. Obviously the zionist scammers could not have the truth left intact ANYWHERE. The following screen captures are from the first page of the hacked report, where the World Nuclear Association is now saying no one AT ALL died out at Fukushima, and from another nuclear organization that has not been taken over. A minimum of 3 people died out at Fukushima, documenting even one destroys the World Nuclear Association in it’s current form. The original World Nuclear Association report contained the following points:
- The generators never got submerged – you have to connect the dot between them being in a contained area and the tsunami thereby not being able to get to them. Some water got into one of the the turbine buildings where several were located and flooded the lowest point in that building to a depth of 4 feet, which means that even if the generators were on the floor at the lowest point they likely would not have been swamped because they are too big – the water would not get past the footings. Perhaps a one megawatt generator would have swamped; certainly not one of the big diesels, which were, according to this report enough to run 14,000 homes each. In addition to this, there were several generators in a second location that never got flooded at all. One of these generators kept running but was not able to get power into the facility because the switchgear prevented it.
- You have to have watched the robot videos, which clearly show the switch gear that malfunctioned after the tsunami never got wet – there was a non tsunami reason for the failure. Also look at the high resolution photos referenced below. There is no switch gear for the diesel generators outside the facility, it is all indoors in areas higher than the water got. Remember that there was no emergency when the off site generators arrived, which means that they could work efficiently to get things up and running. With my experience in this area, Assuming it DID get soaked, a complete replacement of high capacity switch gear should only take an afternoon if done with an emergency attitude. A truck mounted crane or a forklift does all the heavy lifting and the stuff is modular. In every major facility there are spares galore. It is not that hard to make the terminations. A worst case scenario could have been addressed before things went horribly awry, that is, unless a virus did not let the new switch gear activate either. It would take days to conclude a virus was messing things up. You would not expect that. I am sure there is a LOT we never heard about.
- That batteries held AT ALL REACTORS, in contrast to the lies in the destroyed report, leaving only a one hour gap in time where there was no power present to run things before adequate off site power drove into the facility on the road all nice and ready to hook up, but was denied to by switch gear which this report says was swamped but that is likely an assumption because swamped switchgear could have been replaced even before the batteries died. The fact that the offsite generators were able to be driven into the facility also proves that other lies told about the earthquake in general – employees leaving only to find cracks in the road so bad they had to walk home; Why? Why lie like this? AT LEAST this report has some modicum of honesty.
- You have to look at the chart that shows the thermal output of the reactors 8 hours after the earthquake, which is when the batteries running the electrical cooling pumps died, the output at that time was less than 20 megawatts from each reactor, which means that they would not have had troubles before the off site generators were hooked up to restore power if it was not denied by what I suspect was stuxnet infected switch gear, in fact they would never have had serious troubles at all, beyond having to be vented. The real critical time is in the first 3 hours after shutdown.
- Reactor 3 exploded entirely, yet this reactor had the most functional backup systems. At least the original report said the explosion remains “unexplained”. Perhaps those who wrote the report should take a look at this for an answer.
- The reactors are stated to be an “early 1960’s design” apparently to mislead people into believing they were outdated even when installed. This was not the case. Their design was an early 60’s concept but in fact a late 60’s design, and since installation takes years, what more could you expect in the early 70’s? The reactors were in fact a very safe design. This report at least states that the facility was very well updated. Identical reactors at TVA owned browns ferry have been certified safe and licensed to operate through the year 2035. These reactors were also converted over to run the Siemens Scada system. The reactors at Fukushima were not garbage. The fastest cars in production still function on a late 1800’s concept.
I hypothesize that the situation at Fukushima is not being properly assessed by facility controllers because STUXNET is STILL giving false readings to the control panels, readings which obviously have to be false because they show containment pressure when confidental leaked photographs prove beyond a doubt NO CONTAINMENT EXISTS AT ALL AT REACTOR 3, THERE IS NOT EVEN A REACTOR THERE. And I have a perfect explanation for WHY reactor 3 is still showing up on the control room readouts.
The original World Nuclear Association report was perfectly inaccurate with regard to reactor 3 containment. Perhaps the people who wrote that report have not actually looked at the facility or seen the confidential photographs and instead relied on information from Stuxnet infected instrumentation.
Each reactor has 8 separate emergency backup systems, each capable of saving the reactor on it’s own. Three are designed to function perfectly if all power is lost and even the generators fail. Fukushima did not need any electrical systems operating AT ALL to keep itself from blowing up, when power is lost steam from the reactors is automatically diverted from the generator turbines to two totally separate steam turbines connected to totally separate water pumps needing only reactor steam to power them. Even that backup system has dual redundancy, only one of the two is needed for the job. But the valves which have to activate to re-divert the steam, all 6 valves on a total of 3 fueled reactors, eventually failed to. At reactors 1 and 3 these systems worked, but switched off at reactor 1 within an hour and off at reactor 3 after running for more than two days. No one has been able to explain why these systems switched off all by themselves, when they need a powered command to switch off. At reactor 2 they were never allowed to activate. This can only happen if the control system tells them to shut off or stay off, absent intervention from the controller they automatically and seamlessly switch cooling modes to passive rather than electrical.
Some readers may remember that the real issue at Fukushima was malfunctioning valves, and the need to get someone past the radiation to open them. These are the valves that were spoken of. Because Stuxnet kept the readouts normal, no one knew this system did not function until major problems happened as a result flooding the area where the valves are with radiation. This prevented last ditch efforts (running and cutting the wires). One automatic valve jamming and mechanically failing would be a surprise,6 failing can only be sabotage.
In addition to this, another completely independent separately piped backup with an entirely different electronic decision tree which injects borated water at a pre charged 3,500 PSI into the reactor to irrevocably shut down all chain reactions (reactor rebuild required) also simultaneously failed at all 3 fueled reactors. The borated water systems have explosive operated valves so reliable that even one out of 3 failing would be a ten thousand to one possiblity, if that. The reliability of the borated water systems is technically theoretically assured. All three failing at the same time at Fukushima can only mean sabotage. There are now subsequent reports about boron wearing out and needing to be continuously pumped into the reactor containments to stop the chain reactions. This does not happen with an intact reactor, and the fact that they need to keep replenishing the boron at reactors 1, 2, and 3 can only mean that the pressure vessels are breached and leaking, with the boron escaping into the groundwater.
High pressure in all of the reactors proves the quake did not damage any of the infrastructure at fukushima because any leaks would have let the pressure go. In addition to this, the seismic readings at Fukushima were 6.07. Fukushima was designed to handle being at the epicenter of an 8.
The media keeps harping about how all the water went away. It only did because these three backup systems were prevented from shutting down all chain reactions, thereby cooling the reactors which caused the water to boil off and never be replaced. High pressures were talked about constantly in the press; This means beyond a doubt that all 6 steam powered backup systems were intact, and all 3 borated water systems were intact also because if they were not the pressure would have escaped through whatever was broken in them. Absent emergency backup control power keeping the virus alive; (control power Magna BSP admitted was there the whole time by mistake when they said their cameras and supporting computers captured the explosions and maintained a data link) the valves which control these systems would have opened when the generators failed and there would have been no disaster. 3 worst case scenarios where all 9 automatic valves across 9 separate emergency backup systems are held shut by the controller when no power should have been present to prevent them from activating can only mean sabotage.
A historical perspective of Fukushima shows the hydrogen blasts were bogus.
Hydrogen blasts could not have damaged Fukushima so badly, this is a media fed lie. If hydrogen gas alone mixed with air could produce blasts strong enough to blow reactor containment buildings to pieces, which are among the strongest structures on earth (exceeded in strength only by ones like Hoover Dam,) then hydrogen gas filled bombs would be the prime military option. In reality, the Three Mile Island incident proved hydrogen ignition in open air after reactor meltdown is likely to only scare employees, while causing no damage at all to the facility, as was the case there. It is extremely important to know the differences between the boiling water reactor design and the design of Chernobyl. At Chernobyl, a hydrogen blast DID cause destruction of the facility, but it was because the reactor design caused hydrogen and oxygen at a perfect ratio to ignite at thousands of PSI inside the reactor pressure vessel. That’s a big difference from hydrogen alone igniting in relatively oxygen starved open air at one atmosphere (14.5 PSI). The difference would be similar to the difference between a small firecracker and a case of dynamite; there were many orders of magnitude lower blast potential at Fukushima.
Just to be absolutely safe after the Three Mile Island incident, many nuclear facilities installed hydrogen hard vent stacks hooked directly up to the relief valves on their reactors, and Fukushima was one of them. This was to prevent a hydrogen buildup in the containment building in the event of a core meltdown, which caused a minor explosion at Three Mile Island. These stacks are the tall white towers you see in the photographs of Fukushima, and they are effective in getting rid of hydrogen buildup, are directly piped, and vent completely outside. “Hard piped” means that the electrical failures would have had nothing to do with the blasts, because a hard vent is exactly that – no fan needed at all because the system is sealed. Even if the hard piping at all 3 fueled Fukushima reactors failed entirely, it should not have been any worse than Three Mile Island which did not have any hard venting to begin with. While hydrogen venting might be a problem if it ignited, it would not mean the death of a facility. It makes no sense that at Fukushima we got a nuclear weapon style mushroom cloud far in excess of the highest yield conventional bomb.
What then, caused the explosions? The containment walls were at their thinnest points in the lowest allowed General Electric design a minimum of 4 feet thick steel reinforced concrete, were likely to be a minimum of 8 feet thick and were totally blown away. All concrete was stripped from the rebar, which was left dangling. One of the blast doors to the inner containments is pictured here.
Reactor 3 vanished entirely, as shown in the diagram on the following page, and reactor four “exploded” despite being completely disassembled and in hard cold shut down. The yellow dome which should be sitting on top of reactor 4 can be clearly seen in the service area of the containment building. This type of destruction is is indicative of hard weaponry in use; a hydrogen air mix will not do that. Reactors are not made out of tinfoil. There was no potential for an explosion at reactor 4 at all, it had been defueled. SO WHAT, PRAY TELL, BLEW IT APART? That’s the dirty question no one is asking – how did that happen? Subsequent story lines try to explain reactor 4’s destruction away by saying that hydrogen back fed into reactor 4 from reactor 3 via the hard vent pipe, but with reactor 3 obviously blown to smithereens in the diagram on the following page, that would be flatly impossible.
To give you an idea of how big the reactors at Fukushima were, take a look at the photo to the left. It’s the top of the same make and model at Fukushima’s American twin, TVA owned Brown’s Ferry, and it is only the top. The yellow dome sits above this, and is even bigger. (here the yellow dome has been removed for refueling). over 150 feet of reactor sits below that cap. Hydrogen will not vaporize that, which appears to be what happened to #3, only a nuclear weapon would. Reactors are about 14 digits beyond incapable of going supercritical even with a complete core meltdown. The reactors did not explode, something placed in their vicinity did.
Magna BSP had access to the reactors at this facility. They were based in Dimona, which is a military base that manufactures nuclear weapons. Stuxnet was made in their yard. They are stated to be a military company, and a key piece of their equipment was the same size, shape, weight, and appearance of a gun type nuclear weapon.
There is extremely strong evidence that Dimona based Magna BSP placed nuclear weapons at the exploded or vanished reactors at Fukushima, possibly hidden inside their unbelievably GIANT stereoscopic cameras. One of these cameras is verified to have been installed inside the inner containment of Fukushima reactor 3 under the cover of a security contract in the month prior to the disaster. These cameras are identical in size and appearance to gun type nuclear weapons.
Since previous hydrogen explosions at boiling water reactors have never caused any sort of damage to equipment or buildings, even during complete meltdowns, it begs the question how on earth one at reactor 3 produced a mushroom cloud. Three Mile Island sits in the evidence pool against what we have been told about Fukushima. History does matter.
One problem with the reporting in the mainstream media is that it failed to convey just how massive and strong the containment structures really were, as shown in the photos at the beginning of this report, as well as how huge the reactors really were, as shown in the photo left.
A hydrogen explosion would not damage this reactor, and would only blow the sheet metal off the steel framed roof in the service area above it if it even did that, at Three Mile Island the hydrogen ignition did nothing at all. It just scared employees. Another thing the reporting failed to convey is the gravity of the disaster. The containment diagram photo showing the remains of reactor 3 make it painfully obvious that many tons of highly radioactive plutonium in the containment pools is nowhere to be found, the entire floor they were on is completely gone. We are getting lied to.
That was a LOT more than a hydrogen blast, and as a result there are thousands of pounds of plutonium scattered everywhere. The lies regarding this topic seem to be never ending, yet occasionally even now a little truth gets through the cracks. One such truth came in the form of a slip up, where a problem with one of the hydrogen vent stacks (which made the hydrogen explosions flatly impossible) triggered an NHK report that said they could not approach the stack to repair it because radiation readings in the area were at 10 full sieverts an hour a level so high it would only be possible if reactor 3 really did expel it’s core as I have stated right from the beginning:
10 sieverts per hour is an insanely high reading which means that death is virtually assured with very little exposure time. No one can fix that stack, it is staying the way it is because any worker who approached it to even look at it would die trying. This means that in the main debris field for reactor 3 there are positively no workers at all, if there are people walking around out at Fukushima they can only be on the East side of the turbine buildings or some other place far away and well shielded from reactor 3.
Many people remember the movie “the day after”, where radiation sickness killed people over the course of a few weeks. The radiation level at that hard vent stack, over TWO YEARS after the explosion at reactor 3 is STILL at 10 sieverts an hour, over a thousand times stronger than what was in “the day after”. If the radiation levels at reactor 3 were divided by a thousand, they would still be fatal to anyone in under 10 days, a shorter time frame than the deaths that happened in the movie “the day after”. And NHK is talking gamma, if it was alpha or beta workers could just suit up and fix the problem.
TEPCO was ridiculed for initially stating that the radiation from the facility was “immeasurable”. I think they at first told the truth. Now they have this story about the Fukushima 50. Is it in fact a “wag the dog”? No one could be there and live. Why is remote controlled heavy equipment doing the cleanup? The official story is hydrogen blasts, not nukes, so the story line has to at least be within the far outer limits of what a hydrogen blast could actually accomplish; not missing reactors and entire fuel pools blown away.
The following article documents how Fukushima is so badly contaminated around reactor 3 that the only thing that can be there is robots and remote controlled equipment. I have in the past erroneously stated that they took care of the problem with a boron glue that stuck to everything and knocked the radiation down, but if the readings are at 10 sieverts an hour all they could possibly have accomplished is gluing the radioactive materials down so that storms could not blow them away in the form of dust.
Another thing to note is that the radiation levels on the stack, where it needs to be repaired, are measured at 60 meters from the ground. This could be because it is, at that height, a straight view of reactor 3’s exposed core which will never be approached and subdued. That would make a lot of sense.
I suggest you ponder the pictures and materials presented in this report and apply a little thought to what is here, rather than listen to the scamming ziopress. The following report documents the remote control cleanup at Fukushima. And don’t miss where they talk about having to boost the ability of the remote control systems, to allow them to be used from two kilometers away. Spooky stuff, yes, yes indeed.
Now that Osama, who has been dead for 10 years is officially dead, Al Quaida is going to use a nuke, so they say; I strongly urge you to consider this article if a nuke actually does go off somewhere or if other nuclear facilities start acting like Fukushima.
The only reason I believe the management at Fukushima is not telling it like it really was is because victim status has been so well asserted by the ethnic group in question that it is career suicide to point the finger at them, even when they try to kill you. I find it interesting that all 12 Non Japanese employees of Magna BSP returned to Israel a week before the tsunami . . . . .
I might have understood the need for Stuxnet if it’s use would have ended with Iran. Unfortunately that does not appear to be the case. I do hope this article breaks their toy.
For those of you who are reluctant to re-post this because the wording is too strong, I ask you to consider this;
The real answer came out of Fukushima. We have a member of the international community which has already done horrendous damage to a very advanced and (presently) innocent civilization and we simply cannot continue to tolerate it. Consider what ignoring this will cost you. Are you prepared to have a major disaster at the convenience of the couch; because you sat there watching TV rather than dragging your butt over to the computer to at least spread the word? Are your video games, ball games, 4×4 and porno really worth continuing to lose everything for? Is your religion going to keep you silent as well? We really need a serious wake up call. Please let this post be it, rather than some other unforseen disaster.
Thank you to the many readers who pointed out flaws, gave tips, and suggested clarifications, you studied this indeed! My thanks also goes out to the radio hosts who have had me on the air and invited me to appear to discuss this subject.
