There has been speculation that perhaps some kind of small scale drugs ring may have been operating out of the Mezzaluna, and its participants may have gotten in over their heads with the bigger operators in the LA drugs underworld. As fanciful as it may seem, there is some evidence to support it.
Because most people are so adamant that OJ Simpson is guilty, it is inevitable that Ron Goldman often gets overlooked as a possible target of the attacks in his own right. But as author TH Johnson discovered, local residents had reported to a nearby tennis club that Goldman had been selling drugs in the area, could he have encroached on the territory of some bigger players? It is rarely reported that at the time of his death Ron Goldman had an extensive criminal file, including outstanding arrest warrants. Johnson tried to obtain this file during the course of his research but discovered it had been classified under a Californian law designed to protect confidential informants.
Who or what had Goldman been informing on? One possibility is Goldman’s convoluted family background. His father Fred Goldman had married a woman named Patti Glass, the ex-wife of a Mafia lawyer and drugs dealer named Marvin Glass. Goldman had married Patti Glass shortly after Marvin was jailed for his part in a huge drugs money laundering operation, and took custody of three of Glass’ children. According to one of the sons who became part of this makeshift new Goldman family, Fred was cruel and abusive to them.
Was Ron feeding the authorities information about Marvin Glass? Or was Glass, released and in LA on the night of the murders, directly involved in them? According to Glass’ son Brian, his father had developed a deep resentment to Fred Goldman about the perceived mistreatment of his sons whilst he was in prison.
Glass was by the court’s own account a psychotic individual, who by 1994 was dying of AIDS obtained during a blood transfusion. Did he arrange to wreak the ultimate revenge by depriving Fred of his own son Ron?
Simpson himself now apparently promotes the drug theory, at least according to Jeffrey Felix, a prison guard who says he befriended Simpson following his incarceration for armed robbery in 2007. Felix says OJ told him drug dealers had murdered Nicole and Ron over unpaid debts.
If there was anything to this, it is not surprising it was never pursued. The murky nexus of Hollywood, drugs and organised crime has always been Los Angeles’ darkest secret. The tentacles of illegal narcotics dealing spread deep into every aspect of power in the city and as would be uncovered in the years after the trial this very much included the LAPD.
The Ramparts scandal that blew in the late 90s led to the biggest corruption investigation in American law enforcement history. By the end of it dozens of LAPD officers were implicated in various cases of misconduct, many of them involving the theft and dealing of narcotics. Valid leads that pointed to drugs as a motive for the crime may well have been overlooked by all concerned, precisely because it risked airing too much dirty laundry, whether relevant to the case and not.
Whilst convincing arguments can be made against some of the key cornerstones for the case against OJ Simpson, equally convincing arguments can be made that there simply should not be such a weight of circumstantial evidence against him if he is innocent. Even if we account for the possibility that the LAPD fabricated some of the evidence, OJ Simpson would still have to be as unlucky as the hapless Officer Norberg he portrayed in the Naked Gun films for the number of other incriminating things that point at his guilt on the night of the murder to have occurred purely by chance.
He is unlucky that he did not have a more convincing alibi on the night of the murders. If Simpson had been on the telephone or in the company of other people when the murders happened he could have been eliminated as a suspect early in the investigation. He is unlucky that a woman named Jill Shively, who claims she saw Simpson frantically fleeing the crime scene in his white Bronco, managed to almost correctly guess or imagine his cars number plate – Shively said 3ZWZ788, it was actually 3CWZ788.
Although the Bruno Magli shoes were not as unique as the prosecution alleged, Simpson was still exceptionally unlucky that the real killer wore shoes extremely similar to his, and left incriminating footprints that made it appear as though Simpson was at the crime scene.
Perhaps OJ Simpson’s worst piece of luck was accidentally cutting his finger. The deep cut on the knuckle of one of the finger’s on his left hand was, according to Simpson, inflicted when he smashed a glass in his Chicago hotel room. When detectives saw the cut the next day they were naturally suspicious that it’s existence was more than a coincidence.
Simpson’s poor luck has continued in the decades following the trial. Despite this been perhaps the most high profile murder case of the 20th century, with almost every angle of the case subject to endless scrutiny, very little truly credible evidence pointing to anyone other than OJ as the culprit has ever emerged, If someone in the drugs or gangs underworld was responsible, then others would know about it, and people would have talked. The sheer amount of money to be made out of anything pertaining to this most infamous case would guarantee that. It is perhaps OJ’s greatest misfortune that nobody has.
Covering the cover-up
It is unarguable in light of the LAPD’s woeful conduct in the 1990s that they at least had the proclivity to fabricate and plant evidence against suspects. However in the specific circumstances of the OJ Simpson investigation, many critics argue that evidence tampering simply would not have been a viable option for the police officers involved. The problem lies with what the detectives involved could have known on the night of the murders. If Mark Fuhrman really did pick up a bloody glove from the crime scene and plant it at OJ Simpson’s house, he would either have to be extremely stupid or be absolutely sure Simpson was really guilty.
In the early hours of June 13 1994, as dozens of officers swarmed around both Nicole’s condo on Bundy Drive and Simpson’s home at Rockingham, none of them could conceivably have known what had really happened or who was responsible. To plant evidence pointing so clearly at OJ Simpson would have been foolhardy unless they were already certain OJ Simpson did not have an alibi. But It is not clear how Fuhrman, or anyone else on the force, could have known this one way or another. By the time they had arrived at scene, Simpson was out of town and his exact whereabouts at the time of the murders were unknown.
If Fuhrman has planted the bloody glove, or Philip Vannatter the incriminating blood, and it subsequently emerged that Simpson had a cast iron alibi, then it would be quite clear that he was been framed for the crime, and the detectives involved would be prime suspects. Equally, if something later emerged that definitively pointed to somebody else as the culprit, a confession or some damning forensic or circumstantial evidence, then the LAPD’s conspiracy to frame Simpson would surely be uncovered.
It is the sheer extent of the blood evidence, both at Bundy and Rockingham, in the Bronco and on the socks, that make the prospect of tampering seem unlikely. It points to an omnipotence over the crime scene that nobody in the LAPD could realistically have had, at least not unless the conspiracy to frame Simpson was far larger than anybody has conceived.
Countless ‘insider’ accounts of OJ’s alleged confessions, many of them differing wildly, have appeared in recent years. As with much in this case its is difficult to sift through fact and fiction, and absent a straightforward written or televised confession from Simpson himself, it is perhaps unwise to take any words supposedly written by him at face value. Simpson’s life seemed to spiraling out of control, and as his world and reputation crumbled around him, he would become embroiled in a whole series of increasingly oddball misdemeanors, alleged assaults and drugs busts; he even sank as low as to release a sex tape in 2001.
In 2007, effectively excluded from mainstream society, Simpson took part in an armed robbery and kidnapping in Las Vegas, a desperate attempt to reclaim back sports memorabilia he believed belonged to him. The unusually harsh sentence of 33 years he received for his part in the robbery was seen by many as an attempt to readdress the balance of the contentious acquittal back in 1995. Simpson finally ended up in jail, just not for the crime almost everyone believes he committed.
Whatever really happened that night in 1994, only one version of the truth is now allowed any serious consideration in the mainstream media. It is the truth established by the Goldman family’s successful civil prosecution of Simpson in 1997. OJ Simpson is as guilty as sin and that is the last word on the matter, whether it fits the actual facts or not.
As with much history, it is the winners that write the story of what happened. And they get to discard the pages they do not like, pages that don’t fit what they want us to believe. In this American crime story there remains some troubling evidence that what we are now told is perhaps not the whole truth.
A guilty mind
OJ Simpson’s often bizarre behavior in the aftermath of the crime has convinced many of his guilt. Some of his actions not only betray a guilty mind and lack of conscience, but seem tantamount to a confession. In 2006, 1994 crime scene witness Pablo Fenjves ghost wrote a book with OJ Simpson named If I Did It. This notorious book, based on several interviews between the men, describes a purported hypothetical scenario were Simpson killed Nicole with an accomplice he would only name as Charlie.
If we are to take this book seriously, and it would be extraordinarily callous of Simpson to write such a book if he was innocent, then we also have to seriously consider what he actually says about the involvement of a second person in the murders. Was this his son Jason, as many believe, or some kind of drug or mob figure?
Fenjves has stated that from his contact with Simpson he has no doubts about his client’s guilt. According to the author, Simpson would talk very coldly about the murders, often articulating what were supposed to be imaginary details as if they were fact. Was this venture a true veiled confession or simply an ill-judged attempt by Simpson to make money?
But there are other theories to this day, four main theories. Do any of them seem as plausible as Simpson himself being the murderer?
The “His Son Did It” Theory
The book titled “O.J. is innocent and I can prove it” by former police officeer turned private investigator William C. Dear, suggests that O.J. may indeed be innocent for the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman (see full OJ Simpson murders story here). In the book, Dear suggests that the real murderer is O.J. Simpson’s son, Jason Simpson, who was 24-years-old at the time. Dear proposes that O.J. did visit the crime scene shortly after the two victims were murdered but rather than committing the crimes himself, merely initiated a series of actions to help cover up the crime and protect his son. It’s an interesting theory – but does it bear merit in the case against O.J.?
Dear spent several years researching the Nicole Brown Simpson/Ronald Goldman murder case – visiting the crime scene, conducting interviews, and collecting evidence. Dear’s background reinforces the claim that Jason Simpson was the true murderer and hence, his theory cannot be easily ignored. You see, Dear is not new to cracking hard cases – he used the same method to investigate and solve the cold-case murder of Ohio man Dean Milo, which resulted in the convictions of 11 people, including Milo’s brother.
Dear does not contest Simpson’s presence at the crime scene on the night of the murders, but believes he was there after the deaths of Brown Simpson and Goldman, in the hope of protecting the murderer – his own son, Jason. Jason Simpson is thought to be married, living in Atlanta, Georgia, and working as a chef. At the time of the murders, however, Jason was on probation after being arrested for attacking a former employer, Paul Goldberg, with a knife. The newspapers had also reported a violent assault staged by Jason upon his girlfriend, Jennifer Green, just two months before the murders.
And Dear has spoken to another former girlfriend of Jason’s – “Dee Dee” – who says she was also attacked by the young man. Dear says she told him Jason nearly broke her back by throwing her in an empty bathtub and sliced off her hair with a chef’s knife. Dear has seen Jason’s medical records and discovered he had been diagnosed with “intermittent rage disorder” and prescribed antipsychotic drugs, though he had, says Dear, stopped taking them around the time of the murders, despite the fact that he himself had told doctors he thought he was “going to rage”.
Dear also has diaries that experts agree were written by Jason, in which he referred to himself as “Jekyll and Hyde”, wrote that “I cut away my problems” and that he’d kill anyone who hurt his loved ones. “He should be regarded as a major suspect,” says Dear. Others dismiss his theory as “absurd” and suggest it is nothing more than an attempt to cash in on the notorious case and sell a book. They also point out that Jason, who could not be contacted for this article, had an alibi: he was working that night at a restaurant.
But Dear says the alibi is bogus; he has, he says, Jason’s punch card, which is handwritten, despite the electronic time clock at the restaurant being in full working order. Jason could have left work early and forged the card, says Dear.
As it happens, the restaurant, Jackson’s, does feature in the events of June 12 1994. It’s known that Nicole Brown Simpson and family made plans to dine there, but ultimately opted to eat elsewhere. Dear believes it was this snub – as Jason was known to be looking forward to it – that may have sent him into a blind rage.
“I don’t believe that our suspect had any intention of killing Nicole,” admits Dear. “He was embarrassed and in his psychiatric records it said he did not like women to lie to him. We know that just prior to that he nearly killed one of his former girlfriends, Jennifer Green, in a fit of rage. And we know that he carried [a] knife on his boot or on his belt, and he was always known to do that.”
Dear has accrued a frankly astounding amount of artifacts; at his Texas ranch Dear has the car owned by Jason in June 1994, a knife that previously belonged to the chef – which experts have confirmed could be the murder weapon (a murder weapon was never found by police) – and several pictures of Jason wearing a knitted cap strikingly similar to the one used as evidence against his father. There are no pictures of him wearing it in the years after the murders.
Dear claims 98 per cent of people who read his books or hear his theory are convinced. Los Angeles journalist Tony Ortega is not one of them. Ortega spent time with Dear during his surveillance of Jason Simpson in 2001 and feels he is not only innocent, but the victim of a relentless and unlawful stalking campaign by the PI.
“I got to follow [Dear] as he skulked around these neighborhoods trying to get information,” remembers Ortega. “I gotta hand it to him, he spins a good yarn, but the more I spent time with him, the more appalled I became. He was using methods that were really questionable, I mean it was outright theft of Jason Simpson’s medical records.”
Indeed, Dear spent two weeks impersonating a doctor at Cedars-Sinai hospital in 1997, where he knew Jason had been a patient. In the end, he decided not to take Jason’s files, for fear of being arrested, but later received them anonymously. Ortega also believes Dear has a tendency to present assumptions as solid facts.
“Dear apparently found a knife that Jason owned – the guy was a chef! I have knives in my house, does that mean I killed Nicole Simpson? You cannot perform a ballistics test on a knife, so Bill wholly oversold this idea that he has the knife. He’s got a track record of inserting himself in these high-visibility cases and he thrives from the attention. But that doesn’t change the fact that he cannot place Jason at the scene, and OJ’s blood is there – it just comes back to that again and again.”
Former Village Voice editor Tony Ortega says the detective is “full of it”: “Dear’s timeline for that night is a complete farce … and his ideas for how O.J. Simpson’s blood ended up at the scene are beyond preposterous.”
The evidence
Jason stops taking his medicine
Several points support the theory that Jason was the true killer. For instance, Jason’s past criminal record (including drug use and arrest for assault with a deadly weapon) and troubled psychological problems for which he took prescription medicine (Depakote) for “intermittent rage disorder”. Dear points out that Jason stopped taking his prescribed medicine three months before the murders and that only six months before the murders, he went to the emergency room because he was hearing voices and felt as if he was “going to rage”.
Last minute restaurant cancellation
According to Dear, on June 12, 1994, the night that Nicole Brown Smith and Ronald Goldman were murdered, Jason believed the family were to dine at the restaurant where he worked, hinting that the family’s unexpected change in plans (they changed restaurants at the last minute, likely forgetting to tell Jason) may have been a blow to his fragile ego. He notes that on that date, Jason has no supported alibi after approximately 9:50 PM (the murders took place between 9:45 PM and 10:05 PM) and that his timecard for that night was handwritten even though the electronic time clock at the restaurant was working fine. In addition, he would have left the restaurant, where he was a chef, with several knives in his possession.
The black ski cap found in Jason Simpson’s storage building
After the murders, Dear purchased the storage locker that had been owned by Jason Simpson around the time of the murders. In the building, he found several items he believes are crucial evidence supporting his theory. A photograph, dated March 24, 1993, shows Jason wearing a “navy watch cap” just like the dark blue ski cap found next to the bloody glove at the crime scene. Police had examined the ski cap found at the crime scene and revealed that it contained African-American hair fibers which did not match O.J. Simpson.
Knife found in Jason Simpson’s storage building
According to Dear, one of Jason’s classmates told him that Jason was trained in hand-to-hand combat and field knife training while attending the Army and Navy Academy. He recalled that O.J. hated the sight of blood and that O.J.’s Swiss Army knife and stiletto knife were ruled out as murder weapons. But inside the storage unit once owned by Jason Simpson, Dear discovered a knife which matched the descriptions of the murder weapon. A “world-renowned” forensic scientist examined the knife and found that the butt of the knife matched a blow/injury Nicole suffered on top of her head.
Other forensic evidence points to Jason Simpson
Dear calls other forensic evidence into question too. Ron Goldman’s hands had many injuries suggesting he fought hard with the assailant. However, the day after the murders, O.J. voluntarily stripped for LAPD officers – there were no marks or bruises that indicated he had been in a violent scuffle – despite the fact that Goldman was a 3rd degree black belt. Furthermore, none of the 15 separate fingerprints at the crime scene matched O.J.’s. The fingerprints of Jason were never compared to the evidence. Finally, he notes that the foreign blood and skin found on Nicole’s body and under her fingernails did not match O.J. while Jason never provided a DNA sample to police. You see, according to the author, the day after the murders, and before his arrest, O.J. hired top criminal attorney Carl Jones to represent Jason who at the time, had never even been named as a suspect.
Dear calls into question other circumstantial evidentiary points that hint Jason Simpson was the murderer. For instance, records showed that during a fit of rage, Jason had nearly killed an ex-girlfriend and seriously injured another using a knife and that at the time of the Simpson/Goldman murders, Jason was on probation for assault with a deadly weapon after attacking his boss with a knife. O.J. on the other hand, had no prior record of using any sort of weapon to settle disputes. (source)
The “Drug Dealers Did It” Theory
All over TV and radio, the defense also preached this theory, that hit men for drug dealers killed Nicole Simpson by mistake, because they were looking for her friend, Faye Resnick. Resnick admits she was once hooked on cocaine, but ridicules the defense theory. “They can say whatever they want, and they will in their work. They have been coming after me since the second day after Nicole was murdered, they started making up all of these grotesque lies,” she said.(122K AIFF sound or 122K WAV sound) The defense was desperate to put their drug-hit theory before the jury. But Ito wouldn’t let them. He said there was nothing to back it up.
Lee Bailey, one of the “dream team” of lawyers many excoriated for representing the NFL Hall of Famer, attempted to recast his reputation with a book intended for a generation too young to have lived through the “trial of the century.” “There has been a polarization as bad as I’ve ever seen,” said Bailey. “A lot of white people have berated me for prostituting my talents; blacks were happy with the outcome (of the trial). I finally decided millennials are large in number. I can reach them.”
Bailey, with Clarence Darrow, is widely considered the greatest trial lawyer in the last century. His famous cases include the following: The O.J. Simpson murder trial where he dismantled the racist detective Mark Furman on cross examination and planted the seeds for the famous “glove doesn’t fit” courtroom scene; The Dr. Sam Shepard murder trial which was the basis for the movie and television series “The Fugitive”; The Dr. Carl Coppolino murder trial which occurred in Freehold, NJ, hometown of the “Under Oath Podcast” and Bruce Springsteen; The Patty Hearst armed robbery case; and countless others. His fame and notoriety for his clients is only eclipsed by his reputation as an incredible trial lawyer. He discusses all in the video a couple of paragraphs below.
His book suggests the murders were carried out by hitmen sent by Cuban or Columbian drug dealers to collect a $30,000 debt from Faye Resnick, who was staying at Brown’s Brentwood, Calif., condominium until Resnick checked into a drug rehab center three days before her friend was found with her throat slit. “The killers were told to kill a blond woman,” Bailey said. “They probably assumed Nicole was Faye.” And although he concedes he has no proof for that theory, “O.J.” posits not only that hitmen mistook Brown for Resnick, but also that Mark Fuhrman, a white former Los Angeles police detective, planted a bloody glove at Simpson’s estate as part of a racially motivated plot against him.
“The glove could not have been dropped there by O.J.; he simply didn’t have time to commit the murders,” Bailey said. “Mark Fuhrman dropped it there.” When asked under oath whether he had planted or manufactured evidence in the case, Fuhrman invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and declined to answer. He did deny that he had used a racial epithet in the past, a claim Simpson’s defense team disproved by playing recorded interviews showing that he had repeatedly used racist language.
But if Simpson was innocent, as Bailey claims, why did he go missing hours after he was charged with two counts of murder on June 17, 1994, until police spotted him in a white Ford Bronco driven by his best friend and former teammate, Al Cowlings, who led police on a now-infamous, low-speed chase, broadcast live on national television? When Cowlings pulled into Simpson’s driveway some two hours later and the Heisman Trophy winner eventually emerged, police found in Cowlings’ pockets almost $9,000 in cash and, in the Bronco, Simpson’s passport, a gun, a fake goatee and mustache, and a bottle of makeup adhesive.
“When he didn’t want to be recognized, he wore a disguise,” Bailey said. “The gun he brought because he was going to kill himself at (Brown’s) gravesite.”
“I liked him the moment I talked with him, and I still do,” said Bailey, who was disbarred in 2001 in Florida and in 2003 in Massachusetts after he took control of nearly $6 million worth of stock meant for seizure because it was owned by a former client serving a life sentence for drug smuggling. “I think he’s a good man.” (source)
The “O.J. Hired A Serial Killer” Theory
Serial killer Glen Rogers has claimed that he did it. After he was arrested in 1995, he said that he had killed 70 women, and his brother said that Nicole was one of them. Rogers’ brother shared the claims in an Investigation Discovery documentary, and Rogers’ family even claimed that O.J. paid him to do it (which Simpson has adamantly denied). Since then, Simpson’s manager has claimed he received a letter from Rogers admitting to the crime.
Rogers was convicted of two murders and is suspected of several more — but probably not as many as 70. He began his killing spree in 1995, about a year after Nicole was murdered. He allegedly met her while working on her house in 1994 and partied with her, but the police weren’t buying it. “The LAPD is quite confident that we know who killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. We have no reason to believe that Mr. Rogers was involved,” spokesman Commander Andrew Smith told CNN when the claim first surfaced. (source) And, the timing doesn’t work; according to a contemporary report in the Cincinnati Post, Rogers was serving a six-week jail sentence at the time of the murders.
Here’s an article regarding a documentary that was made based on this theory.
The “Mind Control” Theory
O.J. Simpson case, which was planned based on previous murder scenarios which had been successfully covered up. O.J. Simpson was a CIA mind-controlled slave, and the entire Simpson case was concocted as an elaborate effort to cause racial tensions. The Mishpucka, the CIA, the Mob and the Illuminati have all had their dirty hands involved in the entire affair.
The entire affair reeks of manipulation and planning. It is not the goal of this paragraph to go into the case, but just to drop a couple details. Joey Ippolito, Jr. is both CIA & Mob. Ippolito at one time lived in Hallendale, FL, a mob housing subdivision which was protected by a police force run by the mob. He has helped run drugs and wet ops for “the Combination” which interconnects with the Illuminati. O.J. Simpson’s friend Cowlings worked for Joey Ippolito, as well as O.J. Simpson. Simpson distributed cocaine for Joey Ippolito & the Combination. Simpson’s lawyer also is tied to the Illuminati, the CIA, and the mob. One of his lawyers on TV said the trial reeked of government corruption.
Nicole Simpson lived next door to Carl Colby (former CIA director Bill Colbys son). Colby’s wife and kids have been subjected to mind-control. Colby’s wife testified in O.J. Simpson’s trial, but was addressed as “Miss Boe” rather than by her name. O.J. Simpson’s mother worked for a California State Mental Hospital in San Francisco for 30 years. Many State Mental Hospital workers have children who have been programmed. When one of the jurors in Simpson’s case, Tracy Hampton, had her mind-control programming go haywire, she began staring for long periods at a blank TV and hearing voices. She had to be dismissed. During the Simpson trial, Judge Ito gave Joe McGinniss the best front-row seat that a journalist could have. Joe McGinniss was the coverup author who wrote a book covering up about the McDonald-Fort Bragg Drug Smuggling Case. Bloodlines of the Illuminati by Fritz Springmeier: Disney
One member of Jones’s staff at Mendocino was allegedly the mother of O.J. Simpson. Perhaps this explains why one psychologist, very experienced in observing mind-control survivors, noted that during Simpson’s trial, he displayed symptoms of alter-personality switching. Simpson’s trial, which served to polarize the races, left more questions than answers. Why wasn’t the name of Al Cowling’s employer, the notorious drug dealer Joey Ippolito, not mentioned during the trial, particularly since he was an associate of a known CIA and Guatemalan death squad hit-man, whose M.O. is to torture his victims with a stiletto prior to slashing their throats? Ippolito “escaped” from a minimum security prison only three weeks prior to the murder of Simpson’s ex-wife. A Loyola-Marymount University law professor has publicly claimed that in addition to having a Simpson blood sample on his person for three hours, a detective also obtained a sample of Nicole Brown-Simpson’s blood from the morgue and had it in his possession for 24 hours. Why was blood not observed on Simpson’s socks until several days after the murder? Was the cut on Simpson’s left index finger the result of mind-control memories? If the cut was incurred during the slayings, why did his left-hand bloody glove not have a corresponding cut? STOP MISLEADING the CHILDREN, MR. JENNINGS by Brian Desborough
An example of something which appears to have happened naturally is the O.J. Simpson case, which was planned based on previous murder scenarios which had been successfully covered up. O.J. Simpson was a CIA mind-controlled slave, and the entire Simpson case was concocted as an elaborate effort to cause racial tensions. The Mishpucka, the CIA, the Mob and the Illuminati have all had their dirty hands involved in the entire affair. The entire affair reeks of manipulation and planning. It is not the goal of this paragraph to go into the case, but just to drop a couple details. Joey Ippolito, Jr. is both CIA & Mob. Ippolito at one time lived in Hallendale, FL, a mob housing subdivision which was protected by a police force run by the mob. He has helped run drugs and wet ops for “the Combination” which interconnects with the Illuminati. O.J. Simpson’s friend Cowlings worked for Joey Ippolito, as well as O.J. Simpson. Simpson distributed cocaine for Joey Ippolito & the Combination. Simpson’s lawyer also is tied to the Illuminati, the CIA, and the mob. One of his lawyers on TV said the trial reeked of government corruption. Nicole Simpson lived next door to Carl Colby (former CIA director Bill Colbys son). Colby’s wife and kids have been subjected to mind-control. Colby’s wife testified in O.J. Simpson’s trial, but was addressed as “Miss Boe” rather than by her name. O.J. Simpson’s mother worked for a California State Mental Hospital in San Francisco for 30 years. Many State Mental Hospital workers have children who have been programmed. When one of the jurors in Simpson’s case, Tracy Hampton, had her mind-control programming go haywire, she began staring for long periods at a blank TV and hearing voices. She had to be dismissed.
During the Simpson trial, Judge Ito gave Joe McGinniss the best front-row seat that a journalist could have. Joe McGinniss was the coverup author who wrote a book covering up about the McDonald-Fort Bragg Drug Smuggling Case. The McDonald-Fort Bragg Drug Smuggling Case involved the Illuminati drug smuggling operation within the U.S. military during the Vietnam War. On and on the stink goes. Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula by Fritz Springmeier & Cisco Wheeler
Main Source: https://theunredacted.com/oj-simpson-framed-in-america/
Additional Sources:
