Taking Back Our Stolen History
Judge Unseals Pfizer Docs They Wanted Sealed for 75 Yrs. 42,000+ Adverse Events; 1200+ Deaths in First 3 Months
Judge Unseals Pfizer Docs They Wanted Sealed for 75 Yrs. 42,000+ Adverse Events; 1200+ Deaths in First 3 Months

Judge Unseals Pfizer Docs They Wanted Sealed for 75 Yrs. 42,000+ Adverse Events; 1200+ Deaths in First 3 Months

Pfizer wanted you to wait until the year 2085 to know the vaccine has NINE pages of side effects (1291 adverse reactions and counting)…

The new Pfizer data dump shows 42,000+ adverse effects including 1,200+ deaths caused by the vaccine just in the first 3 months of use (1-Dec-20 to 28-Feb-21), and the FDA didn’t withdraw it from the market!

How about the 9400 unknown outcomes! 22% unknown outcomes!

Page 9. NO data about the Use in Pregnancy and lactation, in Paediatric Individuals <12 Years of Age and ….VACCINE EFFECTIVENESS! It’s not a joke, it’s written in black in white on the report!!

You can find some other frightening results here.

Dr. Ben Marble of https://myfreedoctor.com joins host Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show to break down the deadly impact of Pfizer’s data on Covid-19 injections.

Dr. Bryan Ardis of https://thedrardisshow.com joins host Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show to call for the prosecution of modern day eugenicists using Covid-19 to attack humanity.

Thomas Renz of https://renz-law.com/ joins host Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show to call for tribunals and jail time to hold those accountable for forcing deadly medical tyranny on the people in the name of saving them from Covid-19.

Pfizer Data Reveals Thousands Dead, NINE Pages Of Side Effects

Meanwhile, A German health insurer BKK ProVita said an analysis of data collected from more than 10 million people suggests COVID vaccine side effects are “significantly” underreported.

The company said its analysis revealed a “significant alarm signal” and said “a risk to human life cannot be ruled out.”

The CEO of the large German Health Insurer reveals that according to official insurance billing codes 1 in 20 Germans has received medical treatment due to vaccine side effects. These numbers are likely an underestimate.

After revealing this data he was fired. Safe and effective.

StrangeSounds.org has been banned from ADS NETWORKS! CLICK HERE TO DONATE AND SUPPORT ME, MY WORK AND MY WEBSITE! 

NOW PREPARE FOR THE NEXT NATURAL DISASTER AND EMERGENCY:

JOIN GALILEYO TODAY AND GET A SATELLITE PHONE TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOUR LOVED ONES AND RECEIVE UNCENSORED NEWS FROM THE PEOPLE YOU TRUST (LIKE ME!) EVEN WHEN INTERNET AND PHONES ARE DOWN

PROTECT YOUR HOME AND CAR WITH THE BEST LIGHTNING AND EMP PROTECTION AVAILABLE

DRINK CLEAN WATER USING THE BEST HOME WATER FILTER AROUND

You should really subscribe to QFiles. You will get very interesting information about strange events around the world.

Source: https://strangesounds.org/2022/03/this-is-what-pfizer-wanted-to-hide-from-you.html

BioNTech Paid FDA $2,875,842.00 Bribe “Drug User Fee” for COVID-19 Vaccine Approval

One of the documents released was the “Prescription Drug User Fee Payment” that BioNTech paid to the FDA on 4/20/2021 for the “COMIRNATY COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine” which the FDA subsequently approved in August of 2021.

That “Prescription Drug User Fee Payment” was $2,875,842.00. (Source.)

Another interesting document I found was the “EXTERNAL DATA MONITORING COMMITTEE” found here.

Here is the stated purpose of this “External Data Monitoring Committee”:

This External Data Monitoring Committee (E-DMC) (hereafter referred to as “the committee”) is a single, external,  independent, expert advisory group established to oversee safety and efficacy data from the BNT162 Vaccine Program. The  primary rationale for establishing the committee is to make certain that appropriate external safeguards are in place to help ensure the safety of subjects and to maintain scientific rigor and study integrity while the trial is on-going.

The committee will review accumulating safety data across all studies, as well as efficacy data in the Phase 2/3 portion of the C4591001 study. The committee will advise Pfizer regarding the safety of current participants and those yet to be recruited, as well as the continuing scientific validity of the trial. In addition to safety review by the committee, qualified Pfizer personnel will review safety data as specified in the safety surveillance review plan and will inform the committee of  significant findings. Efficacy data from the C4591001 study will be available to the committee when there is a planned  interim analysis of efficacy or if this is considered necessary to conduct a risk-benefit assessment.

And to make sure that this Committee is doing their job properly to ensure “the safety of subjects and to maintain scientific rigor,” who at the FDA is responsible to make sure this happens?

Well, that would be no one. Pfizer is the one who was responsible, and BioNTech funded it.

“Pfizer is responsible for conducting this study. BioNTech is the regulatory sponsor of this study.”

The committee members are to be free from “conflicts of interest.”

The committee members will complete a CT22-GSOP-RF01 Independent Oversight Committee Member Conflict of Interest Form. Committee members should be free of apparent significant conflicts of interest. Any potential conflict of interest that develops during a member’s tenure on the committee must be disclosed by the committee member.

And who at the FDA is responsible for assuring that this committee who is overseeing “safety and efficacy data” is free from conflicts of interest?

Well, that would be no one. Again, Pfizer is responsible for that.

“Pfizer will determine if any potential conflict requires termination of committee membership.”

The question that then begs to be answered here is, what role did the FDA play, if any, in the “external” monitoring of the data to ensure integrity and safety of a new vaccine about to be injected into hundreds of millions people in the U.S.?

It would appear that all they did was rubber stamp the process that was completely managed by Pfizer, and funded by BioNTech.

Here are the members of the “External Data Monitoring Committee” that apparently were chosen by Pfizer, monitored by Pfizer, and investigated by Pfizer to make sure they were doing their job and that there were no “conflicts of interest.”

 

The other interesting thing this document reveals is that a significant number of people compiling the data for this committee to review were located in China.

Rong Zhang: Senior Statistical Programming Lead
4/F, Building 3, Lotus Business Park, Lane
60, Naxian Road,
Pudong ZhangJiang Hi-tech. Park, Shanghai,
China, 201203
[email protected]

Chen Xu*: Senior Statistical Programmer
4/F, Building 3, Lotus Business Park, Lane
60, Naxian Road,
Pudong ZhangJiang Hi-tech. Park, Shanghai,
China, 201203
[email protected]

Huan Liu* Senior Statistical Programmer
4/F, Building 3, Lotus Business Park, Lane
60, Naxian Road,
Pudong ZhangJiang Hi-tech. Park, Shanghai,
China, 201203
[email protected]

Jiyang Chen*: Senior Statistical Programmer
4/F, Building 3, Lotus Business Park, Lane
60, Naxian Road,
Pudong ZhangJiang Hi-tech. Park, Shanghai,
China, 201203
[email protected]

Bochen Zhu*: Senior Statistical Programmer
4/F, Building 3, Lotus Business Park, Lane
60, Naxian Road,
Pudong ZhangJiang Hi-tech. Park, Shanghai,
China, 201203
[email protected]

Ran Xiong*: Senior Statistical Programmer
4/F, Building 3, Lotus Business Park, Lane
60, Naxian Road,
Pudong ZhangJiang Hi-tech. Park, Shanghai,
China, 201203
[email protected]

I wonder if the raw data is also located in China?

Source: VaccineImpact

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.