What would you think if a reputable molecular biologist claimed there is no measles virus? German scientist Dr. Stefan Lanka made such a claim and said he would award 100,000 Euros to any scientist who would successfully prove otherwise.
At first it appeared that Dr. Lanka, who has been among several scientists worldwide claiming there is no HIV virus, was going to lose that 100,000 Euro wager. He lost in the first level of German court hearings to Dr. David Barnards. But Dr. Lanka persisted and eventually a final decision in a higher court reversed the decision. Dr. Lanka did not have to pay the wager because those claiming were found unable to prove the existence of a measles virus.
The final German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) decision presided over by a panel of judges, overturned an earlier lower court claim to Dr. Lanka’s 100,000 Euro prize, was that there was not enough evidence to support the existence of a measles virus. In the lower court, a Judge in the regional court in Ravensburg, South Germany, ruled in the favor of Dr. Bardens in a controversial decision claiming the criteria for evidence had been met.
Five experts were involved in the case and presented the results of scientific studies. All five experts, including Prof. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart as the preceding court, consistently found that none of the six publications which were introduced to the trial, contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.
Those five experts called upon by the German Supreme Court concluded that none of the six scientific papers introduced as evidence for the plaintiff Dr. Barden’s assertion that he had introduced sufficient evidence of a measles virus form the scientific literature. This was confirmed independently by German laboratories.
Two recognized laboratories, including the world’s largest and leading genetic Institute, arrived at exactly the same results independently. The results prove that the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today: They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.
They had misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus and created a composite viral model from separate electron microscopic analyses. According to Dr. Lanka, this is a common error in the field of virology that attempts to determine pathogenic viruses. Because of this error, during decades of consensus building process, normal cell constituents were mentally assembled into a model of a measles virus. To this day, an actual structure that corresponds to this model has been found neither in a human, nor in an animal. With the results of the genetic tests, all thesis of existence of measles virus has been scientifically disproved.
The authors of the six publications and all other persons involved, did not realize the error because they violated the fundamental scientific duty, which is the need to work “lege artis”, i.e. in accordance with internationally defined rules and best practice of science. They did not carry out any control experiments. Control experiments would have protected authors and mankind from this momentous error. This error became the basis of belief in the existence of any disease-causing viruses. The expert appointed by the court, Prof. Dr. Dr. Podbielski, answering to the relevant question by the court, as per page 7 of the protocol explicitly confirmed that the authors did not conduct any control experiments.
The OLG Stuttgart overturned the judgment of the court of first instance, dismissed the action and referred, inter alia, to the central message of Prof. Podbielski with respect to the six publications. The plaintiff filed an appeal against the judgment of the OLG to the Supreme Court. As reason he stated his subjective, yet factually false perception of the trial sequence at the court in Stuttgart, and the assertion that our naming of facts about measles posed a threat to public health. The plaintiff’s position was rejected by the Supreme Court in plain words. Thus, the Supreme Court confirmed the judgment of the OLG Stuttgart from February 16, 2016.
The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of “measles virus.” Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which would attempt by scientific methods to prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.
Upon enquiries which had been triggered by the measles virus contest, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact. This admission may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism.
Prof. Mankertz has admitted that the “measles virus” contains typical cell’s natural components (ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell). Since the vaccination against measles contains whole “whole measles virus”, this vaccine contains cell’s own structures. This explains why vaccination against measles causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination. The court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the RKI with regard to ribosomes in the measles virus, the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified.
In the trial it was also put on record that the highest German scientific authority in the field of infectious diseases, the RKI, contrary to its legal remit as per 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG), has failed to create tests for alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on measles virus, however refuses to hand over or publish the results.
So just what is in those mostly GlaxoSmithKline MMRs?
MMR Vaccine
In the United States, children typically receive their mumps vaccination as part of the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advises children to receive their first dose between 12 and 18 months, and their second between the ages of 4 and 6. Evidence has been published in the medical literature that vaccinated persons can get measles because either they do not respond to the vaccine or the vaccine’s efficacy wanes over time and vaccinated mothers do not transfer long lasting maternal antibodies to their infants to protect them in the first few months of life.
Brian Hooker’s published paper, is a comprehensive analysis of the CDC’s own data from 2003 revealing a 340% increased risk of autism in African-American children following the MMR vaccine. Brian Hooker’s research in the Translational Neurodegeneration Journal provides the most recent epidemiological evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.
Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson confirmed that “the CDC knew about the relationship between the age of first MMR vaccine and autism incidence in African-American boys as early as 2003, but chose to cover it up.” He remarked “we’ve missed ten years of research because the CDC is so paralyzed right now by anything related to autism. They’re not doing what they should be doing because they’re afraid to look for things that might be associated.” He alleges criminal wrongdoing by his supervisors, and he expressed deep regret about his role in helping the CDC hide data.
Scientists Challenging The Germ Theory of Modern Medicine
Are you shocked yet? Or, do you think this was a fluke, even as two independent German laboratories confirmed the final decision? Dr. Lanka is not a lone virus dissident. Currently there are several scientists who openly question the HIV virus as a cause of AIDS or even its very existence as a virus, and there are those that claim the Hepatitis C virus has never been isolated either. (Source)
Dr. Lanka began his pursuit of exposing the germ theory as a false dogma, which proposes that infected humans pass the pathogenic microbes to infect others, after experimenting with a virus he had isolated, then put into seawater, and observed how it influenced life positively. There have been several other germ theory challengers since Louis Pasteur established the germ theory of disease.
Louis Pasteur popularized and forwarded the germ theory that basically fostered the notion of pathogenic microbes swarming onto us mortal humans with such lethal efficiency that we could no longer rely on our immune systems to protect us.
Of course, the burgeoning pharmaceutical industry at the time took advantage of that perspective to the point that Big Pharma has almost everyone in the world convinced that dangerous synthetic chemicals are all we have left to protect us from total annihilation from these powerful microbes.
Pasteur was the original scammer of today’s medical industry’s pharmaceutical foundation of the germ theory. Not even considered a worthy scientist by his peers, he simply took an earlier existing unproven hyphothesis and elaborated on it with the claim that he had discovered and proven the germ theory.
Pasteur reportedly plagiarized Antoine Bechamp’s earlier work and distorted it to create the mostly accepted germ theory to rule and allow the pharmaceutical industry to dominate and tyrannically rule modern Western medicine, even to the point of demanding governmental enforcement of vaccinations. (Source)
Other French scientists who were Pasteur’s contemporaries, such as Claude Bernard and Antoine Bechamp, claimed the inner terrain, which includes overall and organ specific pH levels and all facets of the immune system, countered Pasteur’s one germ for one disease theory with claims of pleomorphism within damaged or diseased tissue (which the Medical Mafia and Big Pharma refused to acknowledge).
Pleomorphism was proven when Royal Raymond Rife’s universal microscope in the late 1930s revealed structural changes in microbes, up to 16 changes per microbe, according to their host’s environment. Microbes, whether bacterial or viral, can start out as benign then alter themselves to survive if one’s inner terrain is unhealthy.
In other words, benign and even helpful microbes can exist in a healthy organism without problems, but they adapt according to their specific environmental imbalance. Then their mutations are considered the cause of disease and not the outcome.
But just as there are benign and even helpful bacteria which are higher in number than the cells of our bodies, viruses can be harmless or helpful as well. Roy Rife observed mostly viruses morphing to the delight of scientists who were pleomorphic advocates. (Source)
Viruses are not alive like bacteria. They do not divide and reproduce like bacteria, nor are they mobile like bacteria. Instead they attach themselves to cells and rely on the host cell to replicate its DNA and RNA codes within that normal cell.
The original stagnant water mosquito larvae analogy for this situation comes from Dr. Rudolph Virchow (father of pathology 1821-1902), who was quoted in Dr. Robert O. Young’s book Sick and Tired?: Reclaim Your Inner Terrain.
“If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat—diseased tissue—rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue; e.g., mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.”
What Pasteur actually had in his favor was good press and support from French Royalty, much like today’s most newsworthy vaccine proponent, Dr. Paul Offit. Media bias and government corruption are nothing new.
The germ theory proposed a war against microbes that were considered capable of creating diseases among healthy humans instead of determining what internal dispositions to infections could be prescribed to cure or prevent diseases.
The Result of This Fallacious Germ Theory’s Dogmatic Acceptance
Orthomolecular Medicine publications editor Andrew Saul sarcastically observed, “Modern medicine may well be defined as the experimental study of what happens when poisonous chemicals are placed into malnourished human bodies.”
It’s well established lately that our guts contain an enormous amount of bacteria that are part of our immune systems. When antibiotics destroy them, more serious diseases, usually autoimmune, settle in. Autoimmune simply means the immune system becomes aggressively dysfunctional, attacking healthy cells in organs, creating inflammation, degradation, and organ failure.
This is also characteristic of adverse vaccine reactions. They tend to disturb and disrupt our innate immune systems, creating exaggerated and inappropriate immune responses that lead to cytokine storms, which attack and damage healthy cells within organs and tissues, especially nervous systems.
Not only do our highly acidic junk and processed foods with added sugars promote acidic pH levels under 7.3, so do overworking, stress, and anger. The combination of our environmental toxic load and inadequate nutrition lead to the stagnant pools within our tissues that become the breeding grounds for existing benign microbes to morph into pathogenic microbes to survive.
Inflammation and tissue degeneration with acidic pH levels attract pathogenic microbes or encourage existing ones into morphing as pathogenic microbes if already present and harmless or even beneficial. The germ theory hoax is the basis of modern pharmaceutical medicine and killing good food with pasteurization and irradiation.
Detoxing and seeking fresh whole foods and adding the proper supplements offer more disease protection from germs than all the vaccines in the world. They are ineffective. All they actually do is create antibodies. Anytime unusual toxic materials such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, and materials from animal tissue are introduced into one’s inner terrain, there will be antibodies summoned.
That is not immunization. There have been many reports of mumps, measles, diptheria, and pertussis (whooping cough) among populations completely or almost completely vaccinated against those diseases. So much for “herd immunity,” which may soon be change to the more acceptable phrase of “community immunity”. (Source)
Vaccinations offer the following trade-offs for purportedly thwarting microbial infections: Death for some, lifelong disability for more, and most commonly chronic autoimmune disease vulnerability. (Source)
Observers have determined that adults who have “suffered” through childhood diseases, by staying home from school for a few days, have better immunity against other more dangerous diseases. (Source)
There have been studies in the USA among Amish children and in Europe among those raised on small dairy farms that demonstrate how being exposed to germs at an early age exercises the immune system and makes it stronger, even after leaving farm life in adulthood, thus rendering natural immunization. Overly sterilizing our environments seems to be making us weaker. (Source)
So here we have vaccinations forced on us with the dogma of the germ theory. Meanwhile, after most “infectious” diseases have been terminated due to actual “herd immunity” from actually contacting those diseases prior to their vaccine inventions, along with better plumbing, autoimmune diseases and allergies have correspondingly risen with the rise in vaccination schedules. (Source)
Conclusion
The legal results prove that the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today, mostly because the original researchers did not run control experiments. (Source) Furthermore, there is currently not a single scientific study in the world which could prove the existence of the virus in any scientific literature. This raises the question of what was actually injected into millions over the past few decades.
Not a single scientist, immunologist, infectious disease specialist or medical doctor has ever been able to establish a scientific foundation, not only for the vaccination of measles but any vaccination for infants, pregnant women, the elderly and even many adult subgroups. The fact that many vaccines are ineffective is becoming increasingly apparent. Merck was slapped with two separate class action lawsuits contending they lied about the effectiveness of the mumps vaccine in their combination MMR shot, and fabricated efficacy studies to maintain the illusion for the past two decades that the vaccine is highly protective.
Studies such as one published in the Human and Experimental Toxicology journal found a direct statistical correlation between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates. The study, Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?, was conducted by Gary S. Goldman and Neil Z. Miller who has been studying the dangers of vaccines for 25 years.
Sources:
- http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/truth-about-germ-theory
- http://preventdisease.com/news/17/012717_Biologist-Proves-Measles-Isnt-Virus-Wins-Supreme-Court-Case.shtml
Related GreenMedInfo article: Why the Only Thing Influenza May Kill is Germ Theory
